.png)
UDC 811-116:1
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-21.136
Kuparashvili Mzia J.,
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Professor of the Philosophy Department
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
e-mail: kuparashvili@rambler.ru
A purely philosophical analysis of the linguistic heritage allowed Roland Barthes to see structuralism as an activity that affirms the value of the design process itself. This way of interpreting structuralism leads Barthes to reveal the epochal features of the language associated with the civilizational code and brings him closely to the explanatory mechanisms of the manipulative technologies of discursive practices. The semiotics of discourse underlies the detection of the translingual (over-phrasal) level of text analysis. The discovery of the special meaning of the semantics of things was confirmed and deepened by linguistic ideas about the floating signifier by constructing meaning through the free structuring of many objects and meanings, the production technique of which is implemented in connotations and their classification.
Keywords: language, linguistics and translinguistics, semantics of things, meaning, connotations, semiotics of discourse.
References
1. Barthes R. Semiotika veshch i// Sistema mody. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 2004. S. 416–427.
2. Barthes R. Strukturalizm kak deiatel’nost’ // Nulevaia stepen’ pis’ma. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. S. 227–236.
3. Barthes R. Lingvistika diskursa // Sistema mody. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 2004. S. 456–477.
4. Barthes R. Nulevaia stepen’ pis’ma // Nulevaia stepen’ pis’ma. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. S. 51–116.
5. Barthes R. Fotograficheskoe soobshchenie// Sistema mody. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 2004. S. 378–392.