.png)
UDC 81`42:2-23
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.5-21.037
Yakimov Petr A.,
Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor
the Russian Language and Methods of
Teaching Russian Language Department
Orenburg State Pedagogical University
e-mail: pyakimov@mail.ru
Pykhtina Yuliana G.,
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Head of
the Russian Philology and Methods of
Teaching Russian Language Department
Orenburg State University
e-mail: pyhtina-2008@mail.ru
This article proposes a variant of the level analysis of the lexical incarnations of the religious picture of the world in poetry, which will reveal and describe the connections between various religious ideas in poetry of different styles and different eras in order to find the universal and unique. The study used structural and functional analysis of vocabulary. The research describes approaches to the analysis of lexemes that embody the religious picture of the world in poetry, and their textual functions; an example is given of identifying the potential of lexemes to express the features of a particular poetic model of the embodiment of the religious picture of the world in poetry.
Keywords: religious picture of the world, religious ideas, lexical incarnations, models, functions.
References
1. Bonch-Osmolovskaya A.A., Orekhova B.V. Korpusno-statisticheskii podkhod k naivnoi poezii // Korpusnyi analiz russkogo stikha. Moscow: Institut russkogo iazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova RAN, 2014. S. 22–36.
2. Briusov V.Ya. Polnoe sobranie stikhotvorenii. URL: https://www.livelib.ru/book/22512/read-polnoe-sobranie-stihotvorenij-val....
3. Bugaeva I.V. Sakral’naia onomastika v poezii Anny Akhmatovoi // Voprosy russkoi literatury. 2015. No. 4. S. 53–59.
4. Bulavina S.V. Russkie ustoichivye slovosochetaniia, soderzhashchie tserkovno-religioznuiu leksiku: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Voronezh, 2003. 24 s.
5. Gasselblat O.A. Funktsionirovanie religioznoi leksiki v poezii Iosifa Brodskogo // Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. 2017. No. 4. S. 11–19. DOI: 10.20339/PhS.4-17.011.
6. Gippius Z.N. Stikhotvoreniia. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskii prospekt, 1999. 612 s.
7. Zenkevich M.A. Stikhi. URL: https://rustih.ru/mixail-zenkevich.
8. Kositsyna N.O. Leksika religioznoi kul’tury v idiolekte A.A. Feta: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Kursk, 2011. 21 s.
9. Lipkin S.I. Sem’ desiatiletii. Stikhotvoreniia i poemy. Moscow: Vozvrashchenie, 2000. 592 s.
10. Matyushin R. Sozvezdie Kresta: stikhotvoreniia. St. Petersburg: ZAO «Torgovo-izdatel’skii dom “Amfora”», 2013. 216 s.
11. Mitina Yu.V. Leksika s religioznoi semantikoi i ee stilisticheskie funktsii v zhitiinykh pamiatnikakh XV veka: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 2000. 17 s.
12. Petrova N.V. K voprosu o granitsakh poniatiia “opredelenno-lichnye odnosostavnye konstruktsii” v poeticheskoi rechi // Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gos. un-ta. 2017. No. 7 (168). S. 73–77.
13. Sergeeva E.V. Religiozno-filosofskii diskurs V.S. Solovyeva: monografiia. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2002. 187 s.
14. Sergeeva E.V. Kontsept-universaliia i khudozhestvennyi kontsept: problema klassifikatsii // Sibirskii filologicheskii zhurnal. 2006. No. 1-2. S. 63–69.
15. Stepanova V.V. Obuslovlennost’ funktsionirovaniia slova v tekste // Semanticheskie i esteticheskie modifikatsii slov v tekste. Leningrad: LGPI, 1988. S. 3–10.
16. Chetyrina A.M. Leksikograficheskoe predstavlenie fragmenta iazykovoi kartiny mira: pravoslavnaia leksika v “Slovare tserkovnoslavianskogo i russkogo iazyka” // Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Hertzena. 2008. No. 33 (73), ch. 1. S. 507–510.
17. Yakimov P.A. Glina i gonchar v poezii Semena Lipkina // Russkaia rech’. 2014. No. 1. S. 28–31.
18. Yarovaya T.Yu. Religioznaia leksika v lirike A.V. Koltsova: k voprosu o samobytnosti poeticheskogo stilia poeta // Russkii iazyk v kontekste natsional’noi kul’tury: materialy III Mezhdunar. nauch. konf., posviashchennoi 200-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia M.Yu. Lermontova: v 2 t. Saransk: Nats. issl. Mord. gos. un-t im. N.P. Ogareva, 2015. T. 1. S. 271–276.