UDC 82.091:821
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-21.116
Nasibova Sevinj Kh.,
Candidate of Philology, Lecturer
Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University
e-mail: sevinc.n@mail.ru
The purpose of the article is the comparative analysis of female images in F.M. Dostoevsky’s and J. Fowles’s novels. The basic method applied in given research is the method of the comparative analysis F.M. Dostoevsky’s and J. Fowles’s novels. Dostoevsky and Fowles are in searches of root of all evil. Both of them are assured that in human spirit are indissolubly merged kindly and angrily, God and Satan. In a shower of hero Dostoevsky indissolubly merge “an ideal of the Madonna” with “an ideal Sodom”. The woman is present at a life of the man as elements. The woman is only temptation and passion of men. In female images of the writer, unlike man’s characters, there is no change at soul level. Unlike Dostoevsky, products of Fowles testify to constant interest of the writer to a problematic “eternal feminist”. In novels of Fowles of the woman have the personal space. Dostoevsky’s heroes submit to life laws; they through great suffering come to humility. But heroes of Fowles to themselves create laws and submit only to the rules. The article contains important conceptual conclusions on the problems of the realistic novel of the 19th century and the postmodern novel of the 20th centuries, defines the peculiarities of the traditions of F.M. Dostoevsky and J. Fowles. The presented work provides an opportunity to take a fresh look at the cult works written in the 19th–20th centuries. F.M. Dostoevsky as the “founder” of neo-mythological consciousness — the cultural paradigm of the 20th century — gave J. Fowles valuable “tips” against the background of modern literary thought and his comparison with the mythopoetic thought of the English writer was especially embodied in mythological premises associated with the sphere of deepest questions of ethics and religious metaphysics.
Keywords: female images, love and hatred, good and harm, influence, novel.
References
1. Angliiskaia literature // Literaturnaia enciklopediya: v 11 t. T. 1 / otv. red. V.M. Friche. Moscow: Izd-vo Kom. akademii, 1930.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Hudozhe-stvennaya literatura, 1972. 471 s.
3. Vasil’chenko T.V. Roman F.M. Dostoevskogo “Brat’ia Karamazovy” v angloiazychnyh perevodah: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tomsk: Tomskii politekhnicheski[universitet, 2007. 24 c.
4. Volgin I. Poslednij god Dostoevskogo / predisl. D. Lihacheva. Moscow: AST: Redaktsiia Eleny Shubinoi, 2017. 780 s.
5. Gifford G. Svyazi anglijskoj i russkoj literatury // Kul’tura i zhizn’. 1957. No. 2.
6. Gordienko Yu. Sravnitel’naia harakteristika povesti F.M. Dostoevskogo “Zapiski iz podpol’ia” i romana D. Fowles “Kollekcioner” // XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego. 2001. Vyp. 4, ch. 2. S. 70–72.
7. Grigor’ev A.L. Dostoevskii i zarubezhnaia literatura za rubezhom // Uchenye zapiski Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta im. A.M. Gercena. Leningrad, 1958.
8. Daihin T.L. Ispivshie chashu… (Idei F.M. Dostoevskogo v hu-dozhestvennom soznanii angliiskih pisatelei pervoi poloviny XIX veka) // Ural’skii filologicheskii vestnik. 2013. No. 1.
9. Dostoevsky i XX vek: v 2 t. / pod red. T.A. Kasatkinoi. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2007.
10. Dostoevsky F.M. Brat’ia Karamazovy // Poln. sobr. soch.: v 30 t. T. 14. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976. 511 s.
11. Dostoevsky F.M. Dnevnik pisatelya. 1876 // Sobr. soch.: v 15 t. T. 13. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1994. 424 s.
12. Ivasheva V.V. Novye cherty realizma na Zapade. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel, 1986. 288 s.
13. Ismailova A.A. Poetika romanov Johna Fowlesa: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Baku, 1997.
14. Zalite T.A. V poiskah esteticheskih tsennostei: Roman Johna Fowlesa “Kollektsioner” // Problemy realizma i romantizma v zarubezhnyh literaturah XIX–XX vekov.1981. Vyp. 568, No. 10. S. 59–67.
15. Zatonsky D.V. Modernizm i postmodernizm: Mysli ob izvechnom kolovrashchenii iziashchnyh i neiziashchnyh iskusstv. Kharkov: Folio; Moscow: AST, 2000. 256 s.
16. Kalashnikova Yu.B. Velikaia sila prozreniia: russkaia literatura i put’ k obreteniiu istiny (Motiv duhovnogo prozreniia v rasskaze F.M. Dostoevskogo “Krotkaia” i romane Johna Fowlesa “Kollektsioner”) // Dialog kul’tur i civilizacii v global’nom mire. St. Petersburg, 2007. S. 286–288.
17. Kasatkina T. O tvoriashchei prirode slova. Ontologichnost’ slova v tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo kak osnova “realizma v vysshem smysle”. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2004. 480 s.
18. Kirpotin V.Ya. Razocharovanie i krushenie Raskol’nikova // Izbrannye raboty: v 3 t. T. 3. Moscow: Hudozhestvennaia literatura, 1978. 751 s.
19. Merezhkovsky D.S. Iz stat’i “Dostoevsky” // Dostoevsky F.M. Prestuplenie i nakazanie / sost., vstup. st., komment. E.A. Shklovskogo. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS Obrazovanie, 2003. S. 682–703.
20. Mihalskaya N.P. Angliiskie pisateli o znachenii tvorcheskogo naslediia russkih pisatelei // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury. 2008. No. 19.
21. Motyleva T.L. Dostoevsky i mirovaia literature // Tvorchestvo F.M. Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1959.
22. Pustovalov A.V. F.M. Dostoevsky i koncepciia cheloveka D.H. Lawrence: tipologiia i polemika // Traditsii i vzaimodeistviia v zarubezhnyh literaturah. Perm: Izd-vo Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1999.
23. John Fowles. Volhv: Bashnya iz chernogo dereva. Moscow: AST, 2005. 950 s.
24. Hasieva M.A. Psihologizm F.M. Dostoevskogo v kul’turnoi paradigme britanskogo modernizma: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk. Moscow, 2014.
25. Husnulina R.R. Angliiskii roman XX veka: dialog s F.M. Dostoevskim: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow, 2005. 300 s.
26. Husnulina R.R. Anglijskij roman XX v. i “Prestuplenie i nakazanie” F.M. Dostoevskogo: ocherki o proze O. Wilde, V. Woolf, S. Maugham, B. Hopkins, A. Burgess, J. Fowles. Kazan, 1998.
27. Husnulina R.R. Literaturnoe vzaimodeistvie J. Fowlesa s F.M. Dostoevskim // Kazanskaya nauka. 2015. No. 9. S. 10–14.
28. Husnulina R.R. Tema “svoevol’nogo hoteniia” malen’kogo chelo-veka: “chelovek iz podpol’ia” F.M. Dostoevskogo i “Kollektsioner” J. Fowlesa // Kazanskaia nauka. 2016. No. 1. S. 14–17.
29. Shchennikova L.P. Problema samoutverzhdeniia cheloveka v tvorchestve F. Dostoevskogo i J. Fowlesa // Dostoevsky: filosofskoe myshlenie, vzgliad pisatelia / pod red. S. Aloe. St. Petersburg: Dmitriy Bulanin, 2012. S. 98–99.
30. Shchennikova L.P. Puti samoopredeleniia geroini v romanah F. Dostoevskogo “Idiot” i J. Fowlesa “The French Lieutenant's Woman” // Dostoevsky i sovremennost’: materialy XXIII Starorusskih chtenii. Velikii Novgorod, 2009. S. 159–168.
31. Shchennikova L.P. F. Dostoevsky i J. Fowles. Ch. 1: Dialog i dialogizm // Tekst. Kommunikaciia. Metodika prepodavaniya: sb. nauch. tr. / pod red. V.P. Komarovoi. St. Petersburg: Academus, 2010. S. 67–83.
32. Shchennikova L.P. F.M. Dostoevskii i J. Fowles. Ch. 2: Mirovozzrencheskie kontrapunkty i paralleli // Dostoevskii i sovremennost’: materialy XXV Mezhdunar. Starorus. chtenii. Velikii Novgorod, 2011. S. 167–183.
33. Shchennikova L.P. Dialog geroev romanov F.M. Dostoevskogo «Besy» i J. Fowlesa «Volhv»: opyt prochteniia // Vestnik SPbGUKI. 2005. No. 1 (22). S. 124–134.
34. Colebrook M. Playing Games with Gods: Iain M. Banks and John Fowles // The Science Fiction of Iain M. Banks. Canterbury: Gylphi Limited, 2018. P. 101–119.
35. Cooper P. The Fictions of John Fowles. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1991.
36. Daviau D.G. The Royal Game and Other Stories Stefan Zweig John Fowles // Modern Austrian Literature. 1986. Vol. 16 (2). P. 136–138.
37. Fowles J. The Collector. New York: Vintage, 1999. 283 p.
38. Fowles J. Wormholes: Essays and Occasional Writings. Oxford: Owl books, 1998. 432 p.
39. Fowles J. Aristos. London: Vintage / Ebury, 2001. 207 p.
40. Fowles J. The French Lieutenant’s Woman. New York: Back Bay Books, 1998. 467 p.
41. Fowles J. The Magus. New York: Back Bay Books, 2002. 672 p.
42. Gervais D. Dostoevsky and the English Novel: Dickens, John Cowper Powys and D.H. Lawrence // The Cambridge Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 35, No. 1. P. 49–71.
43. Hadspith S. Dostoevsky and the Idea of Russianness. A New Perspective on Unity and Brotherhood. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004. 228 p.
44. Handbook of the English Novel of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries. Bonn: De Gruyter, 2017. P. 303–322.
45. James S. Dostoevsky the Thinker. Cornell University Press, 2002. 272 p.
46. Späth E. Daniel Martin: ‘The word as game. The word as tool’. John Fowles’ Poetological Experiment // Why Literature Matters: Theories and Functions of Literature. Heidelberg: Winter, 1996. P. 311–323.
47. Strout I. The Novel Is Only a Game; or, Narrative Techniques in John Fowles’s “The French Lieutenant’s Woman” // Victorian. 2015. Vol. 3 (2). P. 1–13.
48. Twentieth Century Literature. 1996. Vol. 42 (1). P. 124–144.