Your shopping cart is empty.
Log in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Библиотека журнала 

"Филологические науки"

Все подробности в разделе
"Книжная полка"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The idea and art specificity of the novel by Oles Ulianenko “There, where the South is”

F.M. Shteinbuk
80,00 Р

UDC 821.161.2-3

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.5-21.129 

 

Shteinbuk Feliks M.,

Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Russian and

East European Studies Department

Comenius University (Bratislava, Slovakia)

e-mail: feliks.shteinbuk@uniba.sk

 

The article suggests an alternative, in comparison to the traditional national literary studies, analysis of the novel “There, where the South is” written by one of the most talented and at the same time most controversial Ukrainian authors Oles Ulianenko. The suggested hypothesis is that the novel content is defined not by moral-ethic imperatives but by the anthropology of oblivion related to the chopped off head with its symbolic meaning which is interpreted basing on the structural and psychoanalytical aesthetics of J. Lacan. Due to these two factors the conclusions are made that the novel narrative is conditioned by the forgotten events which continue gnawing the narrator-protagonist because the latter found himself incapable to live through those events but who tried to do so by means of telling the story in the genre of a novel. Thus, Oles Ulianenko becomes not a creator of «almost sacred texts» (O. Solovei) but the author who, in the process of human formation, this time taking place «there, where the South is», discovers dramatic sense in the heroes’ overcoming themselves, society and their being.

Кeywords: Oles Ulianenko, “There, where the South is”, idea and art specificity, anthropology of oblivion, structural and psychoanalytical aesthetics, symbolic, image of a head chopped off, formation.

 

References

1.         Ulianenko O. Tam, de Pіvden’. Kiev: Liuta sprava, 2017. 304 s.

2.         Ulianenko O. Iaitsia dinozavra. Kiev: Liuta sprava, 2018. 192 s.

3.         Ulianenko O. Stalinka // Ukrainian Literature (A Journal of Translations). 2018. No. 5. R. 235–269.

4.         Uljanenko O. Tady na Jihu. Brno: Větrné mlýny, 2016. 140 s.

5.         Mankovskaya N.B. Estetika postmodernizma. St Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2000. 347 s.

6.         Lacan J. Seminary. Kn. 2. “Ia” v teorii Freida i tekhnike psikhoanaliza. Moscow: Gnozis: Logos, 1999.

7.         Punіna O. Samіtnii genіi: Oles’ Ulianenko: lіteraturnii portret. Kiev: Akademvidav, 2016. 288 s.

8.         Monolatіi І. Pam’iattevі vikliki Olesia Ulianenka dlia Mikolaeva. URL: https://zbruc.eu/node/86032 (07.07.2019).

9.         Bondar-Tereshchenko І. Tam, de pіven’ (na dvі derzhavi pіe). URL: http://avtura.com.ua/review/152/ (07.07.2019).

10.       Solovei O. Іnspіrovane peklo. URL: http://litgazeta.com.ua/articles/inspirovane-peklo/ (08.07.2019).

11.       Marinicheva E. Knizhnaia polka Eleny Marinichevoi. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/novyi_mi/2011/1/knizhnaya-polka-eleny-mari... (10.07.2019).

12.       Pastukh B. Pravda vіd vsteklogo Uliana. URL: http://avtura.com.ua/review/150/ (07.07.2019).

13.       Dubinians’ka Ia. Tam, de nas nema. URL: http://litakcent.com/2010/03/05/tam-de-nas-nema/ (08.07.2019).

14.       Kropiv’ians’ka Iu. Oles’, cholovіk Bozhii. URL: http://litakcent.com/2017/09/29/oles-cholovik-bozhiy/ (08.07.2019).

15.       Tendіtna N.M., Tkachenko І.O. Sotsіal’ne otochennia geroїv u romanakh Olesia Ulianenka. URL: https://int-konf.org/ru/2016/sotsium-nauka-kultura-18-20-01-2016/1203-ka... (07.07.2019).

16.       Bakhtin M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki: issledovaniia raznykh let. Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1975. 502 s.

17.       Kotsarev O. Svіt loviv і spіimav novikh personazhіv Ulianenka. URL: http://bukvoid.com.ua/digest/2010/01/13/160452.html (07.07.2019).

18.       Motsar O. Utecha. URL: http://bukvoid.com.ua/reviews/books/2009/12/10/120035.html (08.07.2019).

19.       Nesteleev M. Tam, de Ulianenko. URL: http://bukvoid.com.ua/digest/2010/02/16/121910.html (08.07.2019).

20.       Ballová D. Peklo leží na juhu, už len z neho nájsť cestu von. URL: https://dennikn.sk/540732/peklo-lezi-na-juhu-uz-len-z-neho-najst-cestu-von/ (10.07.2019).

21.       Pustovalov S.Zh. Kul’t cherepov i sotsial’naia struktura katakombnoi obshchnosti // Drevniaia istoriia naseleniia Ukrainy. Kiev, 1991. S. 44–51.

22.       Korol’ D.O. Vstup do іstorichnoї tanatologії. Kiev: Naukma, 2015. 280 s.

23.       Starodubtseva L. Nevozmozhnost’ vozvrashcheniia: pamiat’ i zabvenie v mifopoeticheskoi topike soznaniia. URL: http://culturolog.ru/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1034&pop... (10.07.2019).

24.       Lipovetsky M. Sled Kysi.URL: http://old.kinoart.ru/archive/2001/02/n2-article21 (09.07.2019).

25.       Roginskaya O. [Retsenziia]. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2005/2/r46.html (10.07.2019). Rets. na kn.: Pamiat’, istoriia, zabvenie / P. Riker. M.: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnoi literatury, 2004.

26.       Podoroga V. Pamiat’ i zabvenie: T.V. Adorno i vremia “posle Osventsima” // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2012. No. 116. S. 109–128.

27.       Volkov D.B. Psikhologicheskii podkhod kak reshenie problemy tozhdestva lichnosti // Filosofskaia mysl’. 2017. No. 2. S. 13–25.

28.       Maliavin V. Zhuāngzǐ. Moscow: Hayka, 1985. 310 s.

29. Lyotard J.-F. Heidegger i “evrei”. St. Petersburg: Aksioma, 2001. 187 s.

30.       Shteinbuk F. Konvergentsіia tіlesnikh mіkrotoposіv u suchasnіi svіtovіi lіteraturі. Kiev: Vidavnichii dіm Dmitra Burago, 2014. 248 s.