.png)
UDC 82.161.1-1
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.3-21.052
Patroeva Natalja V.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor,
Head of the Russian Language Department
Petrozavodsk State University
e-mail: nvpatr@list.ru
The image of the temple in the Boratynsky cycle “Twilight”, consisting of 26 lyric miniatures, occurs only once — in the poem “Prejudice! he is a fragment…” (1840–1841). The context in which the word “temple” appears is such that it creates amphibole, the ambiguity of its reading: on the one hand, we are talking about a certain temple as a religious building destroyed by time; on the other, about the “temple” of the “old truth” lying in the “ruins”, lost by the descendants of the ancient truth. In addition to the function of creating a lyrical chronotope (the temple as a metaphor for the lost past connects the figurative system of the poem and cycle with historical, world and biblical times, the “language of the ruins” and “the old truth” are opposed to the “modern truth”, as “ancestor” and “descendant”), the image of the temple is involved in the unfolding of the author’s compositional plan and cycling. The image of the temple in the structure of Boratynsky’s book of poems creates left- and right-directed intertextual implicit, allusive associative connections with many works of the Twilight cycle.
Keywords: composition of the poem, lyric cycle, book of poems, image of the temple, chronotope.
References
1. Almi I.L. Sbornik E.A. Boratynskogo “Sumerki” kak liricheskoe edinstvo // Voprosy literatury. Metod. Stil’. Poetika. Vladimir, 1973. Vyp. 8. S. 23–81.
2. Lebedev E.N. “Sumerki” 1835–1842 gg. // Lebedev E.N. Trizna. Kniga o E.A. Boratynskom. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1985. S. 114–211.
3. Darvin M.N. Khudozhestvennyi mir “Sumerek” E.A. Baratynskogo // Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri. Seriia: Filologiia, lingvistika. 2000. No. 4. S. 3–8.
4. Vlasenko A.I. Poeticheskii sbornik E.A. Baratynskogo “Sumerki” kak khudozhestvennoe edinstvo // Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Ser. 9: Filologiia. 1992. No. 6. S. 20–27.
5. Zuev N. Glavnaia kniga Baratynskogo “Sumerki” // Literatura v shkole. 2000. No. 5. S. 20–29.
6. Figut R. Sub”ektivnoe i nesub”ektivnoe v tsiklicheskom sub”ekte “Sumerek” E.A. Boratynskogo // Logos. 2001. No. 3. S. 19–39.
7. Khuzeeva L.R. Vopros o zhanre “Sumerek” E.A. Boratynskogo v russkom i zarubezhnom literaturovedenii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2013. No. 8, ch. 2. S. 192–195.
8. Darvin M.N., Tiupa V.I. Tsiklizatsiia v tvorchestve Pushkina: opyt izucheniia poetiki konvergentnogo soznaniia. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2001. 296 s.
9. Liapina L.E. Zhanrovaia spetsifika literaturnogo tsikla kak problema istoricheskoi poetiki // Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki. Petrozavodsk, 1990. S. 22–30.
10. Barkovskaia N.V., Verina U.Iu., Gutrina L.D. Kniga stikhov kak teoreticheskaia problema // Filologicheskii klass. 2014. No. 1 (35). S. 20–30.
11. Boratynskii E.A. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. T. 1: Stikhotvoreniia. Moscow; Augsburg: “Im Werden Verlag”, 2000. 162 s.
12. Peskov A.M. Iz predystorii liricheskoi tsiklizatsii v russkoi poezii: pervaia tret’ XIX veka. Tsiklizatsiia v sbornike “Stikhotvoreniia Evgeniia Baratynskogo” 1827 goda // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2010. No. 105. S. 201–215.
13. Akopian L.G. Liricheskii tsikl kak tip teksta // Semanticheskie i kommunikativnye kategorii teksta: tipologiia i funktsionirovanie. Erevan, 1990.
14. Kozubovskaia G.P. Poeticheskaia filosofiia E.A. Boratynskogo: “granitsy bytiia” // Kul’tura i tekst. 2015. No. 3. S. 261–303.
15. Patroeva N.V. Kontsept “bytie” v poeticheskoi kartine mira E.A. Boratynskogo: k rekonstruktsii iazykovoi lichnosti “poeta mysli” // Lingvoritoricheskaia paradigma: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty. 2014. No. 19. S. 161–171.
16. Patroeva N.V. Poeticheskaia kontseptosfera E.A. Boratynskogo: obraz “zhizni” v lirike “poeta mysli” // Russkii iazyk v shkole. 2014. No. 7. S. 39–45.
17. Rudakova S.V. Prostranstvenno-vremennaia organizatsiia knigi «Sumerki» E.A. Boratynskogo // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury. Vyp. XXII. Moscow; Magnitogorsk; Novosibirsk, 2008. S. 299–310.
18. Anokhina Iu.Iu. Kategorii bytiia i nebytiia v knige stikhov “Sumerki” E.A. Boratynskogo // Nauchnyi dialog. 2017. No. 10. S. 129–148.
19. Anokhina Iu.Iu. Istoriosofiia knigi stikhov “Sumerki” E.A. Boratynskogo i problema transformatsii tsennostei // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2018. No. 5-2 (83). S. 225–230.
20. Bochina T.G., Tszin Ts. O temporal’nom kontraste v poezii E. Baratynskogo // Iazyki Rossii i stran blizhnego zarubezh’ia kak inostrannye: prepodavanie i izuchenie: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / pod obshch. red. R.R. Zamaletdinova. Kazan, 2013. S. 68–74.
21. Karamzin N.M. Istoriia gosudarstva Rossiiskogo: monografiia: v 12 t. M.: Direkt-Media, 2010. T. 11. 173 s.
22. Akty feodal’nogo zemlevladeniia i khoziaistva XIV–XVI vekov / podgot. k pechati L.V. Cherepnin; otv. red. chl.-kor. AN SSSR S.V. Bakhrushin. Moscow: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1951–1961. T. 3, ch. 1. 400 s.
23. Stebeneva (Gaivoronskaia) L.V. Khristianskaia simvolika i kalendar’ v poemakh E.A. Boratynskogo // Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki. 2014. No. 12. S. 170–189.
24. Koshelev V.A. Evangel’skii “kalendar’” pushkinskogo “Onegina” (k probleme vnutrennei khronologii romana v stikhakh) // Evangel’skii tekst v russkoi literature XVIII–XX vekov: tsitata, reministsentsiia, motiv, siuzhet, zhanr. Petrozavodsk, 1994. S. 131–150.
25. Lebedeva E.S. Pushkin i daty tserkovnogo kalendaria // Dukhovnyi truzhenik. A.S. Pushkin v kontekste russkoi kul’tury. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1999. S. 74–80.
26. Kariakin V.F. Povsednevnaia kul’tura pervoi poloviny XIX veka // Analitika kul’turologii. 2010. No. 2 (17). S. 261–266.
27. Letopis’ zhizni i tvorchestva E.A. Boratynskogo / sost. A.M. Peskov. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1998. 496 s.
28. Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo iazyka: sait. URL: http://ruscorpora.ru.
29. Letopis’ zhizni i tvorchestva A.S. Pushkina: v 4 t. T. 2 (1825–1828) / sost. M.A. Tsiavlovskii, N.A. Tarkhova. Moscow: Slovo, 1999. 544 s.
30. Russkaia starina v pamiatnikakh tserkovnago i grazhdanskago zodchestva / sost. A. Martynov; tekst N.M. Snegireva. 2-e izd., dop. Moscow: V Politseiskoi tip., 1852. 218 s.
31. Arkhimandrit Makarii (Veretennikov). Pervyi Patriarkh Iov i ego vremia // Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoi dukhovnoi seminarii. 2018. No. 1 (21). S. 11–170.
32. Rezvin V.A. Novinskii bul’var // Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo Moskvy. 2010. No. 2 (550). S. 53–64.
33. Sytin P.V. Iz istorii moskovskikh ulits: Entsiklopedicheskii putevoditel’ po ulitsam Moskvy. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1999. 477 s.
34. Vasil’ev N.L., Zhatkin D.N. A.S. Pushkin v tvorcheskom soznanii E.A. Baratynskogo // Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal. 2016. T. 5, no. 3 (16). S. 20–23.
35. Semenko I.M. Poety pushkinskoi pory. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1970. 296 s.