Your shopping cart is empty.
Log in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Библиотека журнала      
"Филологические науки"

 

Все подробности в разделе
"Книжная полка"

 

 

 

Realization of authorial evidentiality in modern artistic discourse

D.V. Kozlovsky
80,00 Р

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.4-19.017

 

Kozlovsky Dmitry V.,

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of

the Foreign Languages Department

Saratov Socio-Economic Institute, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

e-mail: kimo3006@mail.ru

 

Thе article deals with lexical means of expressing evidential meanings in the English literary discourse. The given analysis of different evidential classifications makes it possible to name the fundamental principles of this category. It is formed by means of personal experience, attesting, citing and retelling of different pieces of information. However, the rendered knowledge might have direct and indirect nature. The necessity of marking the role of subject of communication leads to changes in evidentiality examination approach, changing its grammatical scope. In terms of linguosynergetics, evidentiality belongs to modus categories as it allows perceiving, interpreting and transferring information after its mental estimation. The linguosynergetic analysis makes it possible to identify evidential discursive context, representing “situational component” and also “speech component”, realized by means of “epiphase” and “prophase”. The modus frame of an evidential utterance is formed by means of the speaker’s reference to evidential operators: verbs, parenthetical modal words, adverbs, nouns, adjectives and collocations. The study of evidential functions in literary discourse is impossible without identifying the source of evidential statement. It leads to differentiation between author’s speech and characters’ speech. The specifics of evidentiality markers representation is the reason to focus on author’s speech and allows to give definition and describe the performance of “authorial evidentiality” in discourse.

Keywords: evidentiality, modus category, linguosynergetics, disourse, epiphase, prophase.

 

Reference

 

1. Plungian V.A. Obshchaia morfologiia: Vvedenie v problematiku: ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., ispr. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2003. 315 s.

2. Iakobson R.O. Shiftery, glagol’nye kategorii i russkii glagol // Printsipy tipologicheskogo analiza iazykov razlichnogo stroia. Moscow, 1972. S. 95–113.

3. Plungian V.A. Universal’nyi grammaticheskii nabor kak instrument grammaticheskoi tipologii // Mezhdunarodnaia konferentsiia, posviashchennaia 50-letiiu Peterburgskoi tipologicheskoi shkoly: materialy i tezisy dokladov. St. Petersburg, 2011. S. 142–145.

4. Guencheva Z. L’enonciation mediatisee. Paris, 1996.

5. Kozintseva N.A. Tipologiia kategorii zasvidetel’stvovannosti // Evidentsial’nost’ v iazykakh Evropy i Azii: sb. st. pamiati Natalii Andreevny Kozintsevoi / otv. red. V.S. Khrakovsky. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. S. 13–36.

6. Kozintseva N.A. Kategoriia evidentsial’nosti (problemy tipologi-cheskogo analiza) // Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 1994. No. 3. S. 92–104.

7. Aikhenvald A.Y. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 480 p.

8. De Haan F. Semantic distinctions of evidentiality // The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich, 2011. URL: http://wals.info/chapter/77 (data obrashcheniia: 08.09.2018).

9. Grigorenko M.Iu. Funktsional’no-semanticheskoe pole evidentsial’nosti v sovremennom russkom iazyke. Belgorod, 2011. 211 s.

10. Nitsolova R. Vzaimodeistvie evidentsial’nosti i admirativnosti s kategoriiami vremeni i litsa glagola v bolgarskom iazyke // Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 2006. Vyp. 4. S. 27–45.

11. Sternin I.A. Russkoe kommunikativnoe soznanie // Russkoe i finskoe kommunikativnoe povedenie. Voronezh: Istoki, 2002. Vyp. 3. S. 5–13.

12. Samsonova N.N. Struktura i funktsii voprositel’nykh predlozhenii (tip russkikh voprosov so slovom “kak”): Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1989. 27 s.

13. Khrakovskii V.S. Evidentsial’nost’ v iazykakh Evropy i Azii. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007. 634 s.

14. Langacker R.W. Evidentiality in cognitive grammar. URL: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.02lan (data obrashcheniia: 18.01.2019).

15. Kibrik A.A. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoi perspektive: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow, 2003. 90 s.

16. Kozlovskii D.V. Klassifikatsiia vidov evidentsial’nosti v zavisimosti ot sub"ekta kommunikatsii v prostranstve sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo diskursa // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2018. No. 3–2 (81). S. 333–337.

17. Kobrina O.A. Kategoriia evidentsial'nosti v sovremennom angliiskom iazyke: Semantika i sredstva vyrazheniia: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. St. Petersburg, 2003.

18. Kozlovskii D.V. Kategorichnaia i nekategorichnaia evidentsial’nost’ v angloiazychnom diskursivnom prostranstve // Filologiia i kul’tura. 2017. No. 1 (47). S. 30–36.

19. Voloshinov V.N. Marksizm i filosofiia iazyka. Moscow: Labirint, 2000. 189 s.

20. Borbot’ko V.G. Printsipy formirovaniia diskursa: ot psikholingvistiki k lingvosinergetike. Moscow: Librokom, 2011. 288 s.

21. Makeeva M.N. Ritorika khudozhestvennogo teksta i ee germenevticheskie posledstviia: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Tver’, 2000.

22. Ismailova O.I. Stilisticheskoe ispol’zovanie pretsedentnykh fenomenov v mediatekste // Nauchnoe obozrenie: gumanitarnye issledovaniia. 2016. No. 10. S. 219–224.

23. Sharapova Iu.V. Nesobstvenno-priamaia rech’ v funktsional’no-kommunikativnom i strukturno-semanticheskom aspektakh (na materiale an-gliiskogo iazyka): Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. St. Petersburg, 2001. 18 s.

24. Spiridonova T.A. Voprosy strukturnoi, funktsional’noi i kognitivnoi lingvistiki: teoriia i praktika // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. Moscow, 2007.

25. Shestukhina I.Iu. Kategoriia evidentsial’nosti v russkom narrativnom tekste: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii aspekt: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Barnaul, 2009. 17 s.

26. Zaraiskii A.A. Problema analiza teksta i rol’ konteksta situatsii (na primere preemstvennosti lingvisticheskikh vzgliadov J.R. Firth i M.A.K. Halliday) // Iazyk i mir izuchaemogo iazyka. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. in-ta RGTEU. 2013. Vyp. 4. S. 25–31.

27. Hare C. An English murder. URL: https://libcat.ru/knigi/detektivy-i-trillery/klassicheskij-detektiv/6122... (data obrashcheniia: 20.01.2019).

28. Longman dictionary of contemporary English. URL: http://www.ldoceonline.com/ (data obrashcheniia: 28.01.2019).