.png)
UDC 82-94
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-21.127
Bystrova Olga V.,
Candidate of Philology, Senior Researcher
Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
e-mail: bystrova63@mail.ru
The article explores the boundaries of the term “literary chronicle”. The scientific community is beginning to take a more detailed interest in such a concept as a literary institution. Throughout the twentieth century, literary studies studied and described only individual periods in the history of literature. This development of individual periods of the century helped to create the necessary theoretical tools for analytical work on the study of the socio-cultural process in society. For many years, the very attempt to understand the literary process as a phenomenon encountered terminological blurring. The accumulated knowledge of historical literary studies allows us to raise as a problem of scientific research a chronicle description of the life of a literary organization, which is understood as a structural association of creative people (on the example of individual facts of the existence of All-Russian Association of Proletarian Writers). It is the socio-institutional description of the life of the literary community of Russia in the 1920s that allows us to feel the communicative space of the country in which cultural processes take place. Another important aspect in the study of the chronicle of a literary institution is its existence in everyday life, that is, its existence in everyday life. With the frequency of meetings of members of the structural association. In this case, the scattered facts of everyday life become a historical stream of events.
Keywords: literary chronicle, literary process, literary institution, literary organization, All-Russian Association of Proletarian Writers, literary life, everyday life, “framework” of history.
References
1. Literaturnaia zhizn’ Rossii 1920-kh godov: sobytiia, otzyvy sovremennikov, bibliografiia. T. 1, ch. 1: Moskva i Petrograd. 1917–1920 gg. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2005. 770 s.
2. Gudkov L., Dubin B. Literatura kak sotsial’nyi institut: sb. Rabot / 2-e izd., dop. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2020. 792 s.
3. Arutiunov L. Metodologiia izucheniia literaturnogo protsessa // Voprosy literatury. 1984. No. 7. S. 182–188. Rets. na kn.: Literaturnyi protsess 60–70-kh godov: dinamika razvitiia i problemy izucheniia sovremennoi sovetskoi literatury / V.E. Kovsky.
4. Moskva stalinskaia: bol’shaia illiustrirovannaia letopis’ / sost. M. Vostryshev. Moscow: Algoritm, 2008. 576 s.
5. Balagula S. “Shchastie minuvshikh dnei”: obzor rukopisnykh al’bomov iz sobraniia Vserossiiskogo muzeia A.S. Pushkina // Vserossiiskii muzei A.S. Pushkina. URL: https://museumpushkin.bm.digital/article/680503148760031510/schastie-min... (26.04.2021).
6. Chukokkala: rukopisnyi al’manakh K.I. Chukovskogo / predisl. i poiasneniia K. Chukovskogo; podgot. teksta i primech. E. Chukovskoi. Moscow: Prem’era, 1999. 400 s.
7. Kukushkina T.A. Iz literaturnogo byta Petrograda nachala 1920-kh godov: al’bomy V.A. Sutuginoi i R.V. Rury // Ezhegodnik Rukopisnogo otdela Pushkinskogo Doma na 1997 god. St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin, 2002. S. 341–402.
8. Khronika literaturnoi zhizni // Istoriia russkoi sovetskoi literatury: v 3 t. / Institut mirovoi literatury im. A.M. Gorkogo; otv. red. A.G. Dementyev. Moscow: Nauka, 1958. T. 1: 1917–1929; 1960. T. 2: 1929–1941; 1961. T. 3: 1941–1957.
9. Khronika literaturnoi zhizni // Istoriia russkoi sovetskoi literatury. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Nauka, 1967. T. 1–4.
10. Istoriia vsemirnoi literatury: v 9 t. / gl. red. G.P. Berdnikov. Moscow: Nauka, 1983–1984. T. 1–8.
11. Letopis’ literaturnykh sobytii v Rossii kontsa XIX — nachala XX vv. (1891 — oktiabr’ 1917) / pod obshch. red. chlen-korr. A.V. Lavrova. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2002. Vyp. 1: 1891–1900. 524 s.
12. Dyakova E. Grazhdanskaia voina s grazhdanskim obshchestvom: kak ona velas’, pokazala letopis’ “Literaturnaia zhizn’ Rossii 1920-kh godov” // Kontent-platforma Pandia.ru. URL: https://pandia.ru/text/78/311/31675.php (12.04.2021).
13. Eikhenbaum B.M. Moi vremennik. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo pisatelei, 1929. 192 s.
14. Hansen-Löve A. “Bytologiia” mezhdu faktami i funktsiiami // Revue des etudes slaves. 1985. Vol. 57. P. 91–103.
15. RGALI. F. 1638. Op. 1. Ed. 9.
16. Pervyi Vserossiiskii s”ezd proletarskikh pisatelei // Kuznitsa. 1921. No. 7. S. 32–36.
17. Vserossiiskaia assotsiatsiia proletarskikh pisatelei // Kuznitsa. 1921. No. 8. S. 35–36.
18. “Stenogramma”: Politika i literatura. Tsifrovoi arkhiv literaturnykh organizatsii 1920–1930-kh gg. URL: http://stenogramma.imli.ru/ (12.04.2021).
19. Lotman Yu.M. Besedy o russkoi kul’ture: byt i traditsii russkogo dvorianstva (XVIII — nachalo XIX veka). St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB, 1994. 481 s.
20. Guskov N.A., Egorova K.B. Materialy dlia sostavleniia khroniki kul’turnoi zhizni Leningrada na rubezhe 1920-kh i 1930-kh gg. // Instituty kul’tury Leningrada na perelome ot 1920-kh k 1930-m godam: materialy proekta. URL: http://old.pushkinskijdom.ru/Default.aspx?tabid=10460 (12.04.2021).
21. Levchenko Ya.S. Drugaia nauka: russkie formalisty v poiskakh bio-grafii. Moscow: Izd. dom Vys. shk. ekonomiki, 2012. 298 s.
22. Dinershtein E. Karkas istorii // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2006. No. 4. S. 358–363. Rets. na kn.: Literaturnaia zhizn’ Rossii 1920-kh godov: sobytiia, otzyvy sovremennikov, bibliografiia. T. 1.
23. Katanyan V.A. Mayakovsky: khronika zhizni i deiatel’nosti. 5-e izd. Moscow, 1985. 647 s.