.png)
UDC 81`36"16/17"
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.3-21.024
Ignatovich Tatiana Yu.,
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor
of the Russian Language and its Teaching Department
Transbaikal State University
e-mail: ignatovich_chita@mail.ru
Biktimirova Yulia V.,
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor
of the Russian Language and its Teaching Department
Transbaikal State University
e-mail: pravo_chita@mail.ru
The аrticle is devoted to identification of features of verbal shaping in the language of the Transbaikal monuments of the business writing of the 17–18th centuries and to consideration of its alternativeness in aspect of formation of grammatical norms in synchronic opposition of the Russian of the center and the periphery and diachronic opposition of the Transbaikal speech usage of the 17–18th centuries and the modern period. It is established that in the majority of the Transbaikal business documents the happened transition to the new system of verbal forms of an infinitive, time in an indicative mood is noted. In general features of the use of new and archaic verbal forms are caused by a complex of factors, in particular a document genre, banality of his structural components, the nature of the stated events, reflection of the dialect phenomena from the Transbaikal colloquial usage of that time is less often shown. The comparative analysis of verbal forms of of regional business written ususes of the 17–18th centuries revealed in verb formation and use in the business monuments of Nerchinsk, Transbaikalia normalizators trends, General trends emerging written business language in the centre and a number of Russian regions. The processes of unification follow the General Russian trend towards unification in the system of verbal formation. The results of this research supplement and expand scientific information on language morphological processes in the formed standard business language in the center and regional options.
Keywords: Transbaikalia, Moscow, the 17–18th centuries, business usage, alternativeness, verbal shaping, formation of norms.
References
1. Palagina V.V. Padezhnye formy sushchestvitel’nykh edinstvennogo chisla v rechi tomskogo naseleniia pervoi poloviny XVII v. // Voprosy iazyka i ego istorii. Tomsk, 1972. S. 6–11.
2. Liubimova O.A. Otrazhenie nekotorykh osobennostei glagol’nykh form v iazyke mungatskikh delovykh dokumentov XVIII v. // Voprosy leksiki i grammatiki russkogo iazyka. 1974. Vyp. 1. S. 62–66.
3. Popova N.E. Morfologiia delovykh dokumentov Krasnoiarskogo ostroga XVII — nachala XVIII vv. (formy skloneniia i spriazheniia) // Materialy 4-i Sibirskoi zonal’noi konferentsii kafedr russkogo iazyka / otv. red. A.A. Skvortsova. Krasnoiarsk, 1960. S. 285–332.
4. Mazo S.E. Dialektnye osobennosti morfologii iazyka delovykh dokumentov g. Tomska XVII v. // Voprosy russkogo iazyka i ego govorov. Tomsk, 1968. S. 135–142.
5. Tsomakion N.A. Turukhanskie govory v ikh istorii i sovremennom sostoianii. Krasnoiarsk: Krasnoiarskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1966. 495 s.
6. Khristosenko G.A. Materialy Nerchinskoi voevodskoi kantseliarii kak lingvisticheskii istochnik // Slovo Zabaikal’ia. 2007. No. 1. S. 192–197.
7. Maiorov A.P. Ocherki leksiki regional’noi delovoi pis’mennosti XVIII veka. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2006. 263 s.
8. Biktimirova Iu.V. Morfologiia pamiatnikov delovoi pis’mennosti Vostochnogo Zabaikal’ia kontsa XVII–XVIII v.: imennye formy: monografiia. Chita: ZabGU, 2016. 165 s.
9. Chernykh P.Ia. Sibirskie govory. Irkutsk: Irkutskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1953. 96 s.
10. Pamiatniki moskovskoi delovoi pis’mennosti XVIII veka / pod red. S.I. Kotkova. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. 319 s.
11. Tokmacheva I.B. Poruchnye zapisi kak pamiatniki russkogo iazyka: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1984. 17 s.
12. RGADA. F. 214. Stb. 973. 1685–1686 gg.
13. Zhivov V.M. Ocherki istoricheskoi morfologii russkogo iazyka XVII–XVIII vekov. Moscow: Iazyk slavianskoi kul’tury: A. Koshelev, 2004. 655 s.
14. Zakharova L.A. Glagol’nye formy v pamiatnikakh pis’mennosti Ketskogo ostroga XVII veka // Voprosy iazykoznaniia i sibirskoi dialektologii. 1973. Vyp. 3. S. 25–313.
15. Ignatovich T.Iu. Vostochno-Zabaikal’skie govory severno-russkogo proiskhozhdeniia v istorii i sovremennom sostoianii (na materiale fonetiki i morfologii): monografiia. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2013. 312 s.
16. Khristosenko G.A. Chastnoe pis’mo XVII — nachala XVIII vekov kak is-tochnik izucheniia istorii russkogo iazyka // Koordinatsionnoe soveshchanie po problemam izucheniia sibirskikh govorov kafedr russkogo iazyka vuzov Sibiri, Urala i Dal’nego Vostoka (2–4 oktiabria 1991 g.): tezisy dokladov. Krasnoiarsk, 1991. S. 142–143.
17. RGADA. F. 214. Stb. 1346. 1700 g.
18. GAZK. F. 10. Op. 1. D. 139. 1741 g.
19. GAZK. F. 10. Op. 1. D. 137. 1743 g.
20. GAZK. F. 10. Op. 1. D. 64. 1752 g.
21. RGADA. F. 1142. Kn. 78. 1699 g.
22. RGADA. F. 214. D. 1282. 1703 g.