.png)
UDC 811.161.1 + 81'37
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-20.003
Sosnina Lyudmila V.,
Doctor of Philology,
Associate Professor, Professor
of the English Language Department
Donetsk National Technical University
e-mail: ludmilasosnina@gmail.com
The subject matter of this article relates to the complex description of adjectives-composites of the Russian language within the onomasiological class “person’s social feature”. There have been analysed organization features of composites formation and ways of onomasiological structure definition as to composite adjectives within the onomasiological class. All adjective-composites of modern Russian are considered as univerbalisation composites, derivation composites and units of quasi-composition. Univerbalisation composites demonstrate a complete semantic identity with a producing word-combination. Derivation composites have shown the relations of external motivation between a basic word-combination and a new composite. Units of quasi-composition are formed on the basis of structural models of univerbalisation and derivation.
The analysis of these linguistic units is carried out according to their belonging to a certain onomasiological model consisting of an onomasiological basis and an onomasiological feature that allows to distinguish 17 models of adjective composites. The author comes to the conclusion that the onomasiological class should be understood as a set of nominathems, in which the feature description is realized in one corresponding grammatical class of units (adjectives) with the help of the same structural method, mostly with the help of all kinds of composites. This research has developed the modern nomination theory and provides a basis for complex description of language units.
Keywords: composite, onomasiological approach, model, basis, feature, nomination, univerbalization, derivation, quasi-composite.
References
1. Babina L.V., Fedenko A.Iu. Otsenochnyi potentsial dvukhkompo-nentnykh slozhnykh slov, reprezentiruiushchikh znaniia o cheloveke // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2015. No. 3 (44). S. 41–49.
2. Benvenist E. Obshchaia lingvistika / per. s frants. Iu.N. Karaulova. Moscow: Progress, 1974. 447 s.
3. D’iachok N.V. Univerbatsiia v russkom iazyke: strukturno-semanticheskoe i onomasiologicheskoe opisanie: аvtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk / Institut iazykoznaniia im. A.A. Potebni NAN Ukrainy. Kiev, 2015.
4. Kosova V.A. Onomasiologicheskii podkhod kak osnova issledovaniia slovoobrazovatel’noi kategorizatsii deistvitel’nosti // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosud. un-ta. 2008. T. 150. Kn. 6. S. 217–224.
5. Kubriakova E.S. Chasti rechi v onomasiologicheskom osveshchenii. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 114 s.
6. Kubriakova E.S. Tipy iazykovykh znachenii. Semantika proizvodnogo slova. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. 199 s.
7. Sosnina L.V. Ad”ektivnye kompozity russkogo iazyka: strukturnyi i onomasiologicheskii aspekty: аvtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Donetsk, 2017.
8. Terkulov V.I. Kompozity russkogo iazyka v onomasiologicheskom aspekte: аvtoref. dis. …d-ra filol. nauk. Gorlovka, 2008.
9. Chizhova L.A. Onomasiologicheskii aspekt slovoobrazovatel’nykh kategorii russkogo iazyka : sb. tezisov Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa “Russkii iazyk: istoricheskie sud’by i sovremennost’ ”, Moskva, MGU, 13–16 marta 2001 g. Moscow, 2001. S. 198–199.
10. Dokulil M. Tvoreni slov v ceštine. I. Teorie odvozováni slov. Praha: CAV, 1962. 263 s.