.png)
UDC 81`42
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-21.053
Zhanturina Bakhyt N.,
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor,
Professor of the English Language Department
Voennyi Universitet, Ministry of Defence, Russian Federation
e-mail: uvaursi@inbox.ru
Vashunina Irina V.,
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor,
Professor of the German Language Department
Russian Foreign Trade Academy
e-mail: vashunina@yandex.ru
Text generation in poetic landscapes is considered from cognitive positions, with nature perception as part of spatial event conceptualization procedure. Emily Dickinson’s poems (No. 140, 668) and their Russian versions were taken as illustrations as for perception modules as sensual components. Virtual creolization was dealt with, as well as ways of translation equivalence, omission and forced restructuring. Perceptual thinking is a lower pre-semantic level not represented in a clear way. Apart from lexemes with meanings based on a clearly-cut perceptual component percepts are present in sensory words as traces of former perception. Modularity in representing percepts and their images generates a textual quality of virtual creolization, synthesis of verbal component and that of its representation image together with /without a reminiscence from another module. Text generation in a primary and translation texts was described as a reconstruction of perceptual and cognitive activity inherent to observer-speaker in an actual period. The analysis shows virtual creolization as a characteristic of initial and translation texts, which makes omission and forced restructuring transformations necessary.
Keywords: perception module, percept, virtual creolization, omission, forced restructuring.
References
1. Chernigovskaya T.V. Cheshirskaia ulybka kota Shredingera: iazyk i soznanie. 3-e izd. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom IaSK: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2017. 448 s.
2. Kustova G.I. Tipy proizvodnykh znachenii i mekhanizmy iazykovogo rasshireniia. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2004. 472 s.
3. Zhanturina B.N. Metafory na osnove pertseptivnogo komponenta (na materiale russkogo i angliiskogo iazykov): monografiia. Moscow: Flinta, 2018. 164 s.
4. Karasik V.I. Iazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 477 s.
5. Koshelev A.D. O kognitivnom iazyke mysli i ego ispol’zovanii dlia opisaniia iazykovykh znachenii i vizual’nykh sobytii // Reprezentatsiia sobytii: integrirovannyi podkhod s pozitsii kognitivnykh nauk / otv. red. V.I. Zabotkina. 2-e izd. Moscow: : Izdatel’skii dom IaSK: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2017. 360 s.
6. Osnovaniia sistemnoi leksikografii // Iazykovaia kartina mira i sistemnaia leksikografiia / V.Yu. Apresian, Yu.D. Apresian, E.E. Babaeva I dr.; otv. red. Yu.D. Apresian. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur, 2006. S. 3–160.
7. Krysin L.P. Tolkovyi slovar’ inoiazychnykh slov. Moscow: Russkii iazyk: Drofa, 1998. 846 s.
8. Vashunina I.V. Kreolizovannyi tekst kak sredstvo rechevogo vozdeistviia // Zhizn’ iazyka v kul’ture i sotsiume: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Moscow: In-t iazykoznaniia RAN, 2015. S. 199–200.
9. Cherneiko L.O. Kak rozhdaetsia smysl: smyslovaia struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta i lingvisticheskie printsipy ee modelirovaniia: ucheb. posobie po spetskursu dlia studentov. Moscow: Gnozis, 2017. 208 s.
10. Dickinson E. Stikhotvoreniia: sbornik (na angliiskom iazyke s parallel’nym russkim tekstom) / sost. M. Gavrilova. Moscow: Raduga, 2001. 448 s.
11. Zhanturina B.N. Tsvetovye terminy pri perevode // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 22: Teoriia perevoda. 2010. No. 1. S. 85–95.
12. Dickinson E. Lirika. Moscow: Eksmo-Press, 2001. 127 s.