.png)
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.3-20.018
Gusarenko Sergey V.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor,
Head of the Russian Language Culture Department For Technical Specialties
Humanitarian Institute of the North Caucasus Federal University
e-mail: sgusarenko@mail.ru
Gusarenko Marina С.,
Candidate of Philologу, Associate Professor
of the Romance-Germanic Linguistics and Linguodidactics Department
Humanitarian Institute of the North Caucasus Federal University
e-mail: mkgusarenko@mail.ru
The article presents the results of the study of the linear-semantic structure of the narrative; a model that includes sequences of story-forming predicates and the corresponding linguistic frames is proposed. Suggested to introduce the concept of the standard language semantics of the frame into linguistic circulation. The work based on the material of the stories of Russian and Soviet writers of XX century. Established that throughout the entire narrative fragment that actualizes a certain frame, language expressions are distributed which are carried the values of the terminals of this frame and organizing the structural unity of the narrative. That is, the language expressions belonging to certain terminals of a specific frame structure the narrative, namely, distributed different types of necessary and/or possible components of the frame along its linear structure, largely determining the space-time parameters and cause-effect relations in the corresponding fragment of the narrative, or in the entire narrative. It is concluded that, firstly, the model of an artistic narrative with all of its reductions and generalizations should consist of several levels, as in order to identify typical elements of a narrative in its structure, operations of predicate classification are needed (as well as of deducing/capturing macrostructures, etc.) Secondly, in many cases the model will be a linear junction of structures of different levels. Also concluded that the recognition of the linguistic essence of plot-forming frames opens up the possibility of using their standard meanings for a purely linguistic description of a narrative — without any references to the cognitive aspects of the language.
Keywords: narrative, story-forming predicate, frame, semantic structure, predicate-frame model, standard semantics.
References
1. Todorov Tz. Grammatika povestvovatel’nogo teksta // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Lingvistika teksta. Vyp. VIII. Moscow, 1978. S. 450–463.
2. van Dijk T., Kintsch W. Strategii ponimaniia sviaznogo teksta // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Kognitivnye aspekty iazyka. Vyp. XXIII. Moscow, 1988. S. 153–211.
3. Krizhovetskaia O.M. Sovremennaia belletristika: diskurs i narrative // Kritika i semiotika. 2009. Vyp. 13. S. 204–212.
4. Minsky M. Freimy dlia predstavleniia znanii. Moscow: Energiia, 1979. 152 s.
5. Apresian Iu.D. Fundamental’naia klassifikatsiia predikatov i sistemnaia leksikografiia // Grammaticheskie kategorii: ierarkhii, sviazi, vzaimodeistvie: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Sankt-Petersburg, 22–24 sentiabria 2003 g.). St. Petersburg, 2003. S. 7–21.
6. Alefirenko N.F., Iaroshchuk I.A. Khudozhestvennyi freim kak sredstvo interpretatsii metafory (na materiale khudozhestvennoi prozy pisatelei Chernozem’ia) // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2013. T. 18. No. 13. S. 24–30.
7. Fillmore Ch. Freimy i semantika ponimaniia // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Kognitivnye aspekty iazyka. Vyp. XXIII. Moscow, 1988. S. 52–92.
8. Fillmore Ch. Osnovnye problemy leksicheskoi semantiki // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Prikladnaia lingvistika. Vyp. XII. Moscow, 1983. S. 74–122.
9. Hayes Ph., Hauptmann A.G., Carbonell J.G., Tomita M. Semantiko-sintaksicheskii analiz ustnoi rechi: podkhod, osnovannyi na semanticheskikh padezhnykh freimakh // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Komp’iuternaia lingvistika. Vyp. XXIV. Moscow, 1988. S. 292–310.
10. van Dijk T.A. Kontekst i poznanie. Freimy znanii i ponimanie rechevykh aktov// Iazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiia: Sb. rabot. M.: Progress, 1989. S. 12–40.
11. Stalnaker R. Pragmatika // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Lingvisticheskaia pragmatika. Vyp. XVI. Moscow, 1985. S. 419–438.
12. Keiffer F. O presuppozitsiiakh // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Lingvistika teksta. Vyp. VIII. Moscow, 1978. S. 337–369.
13. Schank R., Birnbaum L., Mey J. K integratsii pragmatiki i semantiki // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Komp’iuternaia lingvistika. Vyp. XXIV. Moscow, 1988. S. 32–47.
14. Gusarenko S.V., Gusarenko M.K. Freimovye struktury v kognitivno-semanticheskoi organizatsii narrativa // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2016. No. 4. S. 33–40.
15. Koch W. Predvaritel’nyi nabrosok diskursivnogo analiza semanticheskogo tipa // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike: Lingvistika teksta. Vyp. VIII. Moscow, 1978. S. 149–171.
16. Lavrenev B. Komendant Pushkin // Iumor ser’eznykh pisatelei. Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1990. S. 395–439.
17. Kuprin A. Mirnoe zhitie // Russkii rasskaz nachala XX veka. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1983. S. 183–192.
18. Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo iazyka. URL: http://ruscorpora.ru/new/ (17.03.2019).
19. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar’ russkogo iazyka. Moscow: Russkii iazyk, 1986. 797 s.