.png)
Kolesnichenko Elena Leonidovna,
Candidate of Philological Science, Senior Lecturer of Linguistics and Russian Language Subdepartment
Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages
The State Higher Educational Establishment Donbass State Pedagogical University
Gabidullina Alla Rashatovna,
Doctor of Philological Science, Professor Linguistics and Russian Language Subdepartment
Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages
The State Higher Educational Establishment Donbass State Pedagogical University
Е-mail: ar_gabi54@mail.ru
The article is dedicated to the research of the semantic-stylistic and communicative-pragmatic features of the paradoxical statements in the works of M.M. Zhvanetsky.
Syntagmatic paradox arises in the essays of M.M. Zhvanetsky as a result of referential untruthfulness statements, logical absurdity. Paradigmatic paradoxes are caused by law asymmetric dualism of the linguistic sign, its homonymy, synonymy, paronymy and the presence of antonymous, partonymous, genus — species and other relationships in the language system.
Pragmatic paradoxes can only be contradictory statements containing pragmatic context that expresses a situational conflict. It is based on breach of various aspects of the communicative context.
Key words: paradox, antiphrasis, oxymoron, symploke, paradoxical situation
References
1. Аrtamonov V.P., Аlekseeva M.V. Paradoks v novellakh Mopassana // Stilisticheskie issledovaniya khudozhestvennogo teksta. — Yakutsk: YaGU, 1988. — S. 38—45.
2. Denisova O.K. K voprosu ob ispol'zovanii nekotorykh stilisticheskikh sredstv v p'esakh Oskara Uajl'da // Voprosy leksikologii i stilistiki romano-germanskikh yazykov. — Irkutsk, 1972. — Vyp. 1. — S. 73—85.
3. Shpektrova N.Yu. K voprosu o literaturno-khudozhestvennom paradokse (na materiale proizvedenij O. Uajl'da) // Voprosy leksikologii i stilistiki romano-germanskikh yazykov. — Samarkand, 1975. — S. 218—227.
4. Zavel'skaya D.А. Rol' paradoksa v tvorchestve V.G. Korolenko // Filologicheskie nauki. — 1998. — № 2. — S. 42—50.
5. Sazonova T.P. Paradoks v tvorchestve Ivlina Vo. Romany 20—30-kh godov: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — M., 1997. — 16 s.
6. Shashkova S.I. Rechevye sredstva vyrazheniya paradoksal'nosti v proizvedeniyakh I. Bunina: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Orel, 1998. — 17 s.
7. Yakunin А.V. Kontseptsiya paradoksa v khudozhestvennom soznanii Osipa Mandel'shtama: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Vladivostok, 2002. — 21 s.
8. Gabidullina А.R. Paradoksal'nye vyskazyvaniya v proizvedeniyakh V. Erofeeva // Skhіdnoslov’yans'ka fіlologіya: zb. naukovikh prats' / Gorlіvs'kij derzh. ped. іn-t іnozemn. mov; Donets'kij nats. un-t. — Vip. 21. Movoznavstvo. — Gorlіvka: Vidavnitstvo GDPІІM, 2011. — S. 3—12.
9. Ovsyannikov V.V. YAzykovye sredstva vyrazheniya komicheskogo v angloyazychnoj proze: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Leningrad, 1981. —23 s.
10. Semen G.Ya. Lingvisticheskaya priroda i funktsionirovanie stilisticheskogo priema paradoksa (na materiale anglijskogo yazyka): Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Odessa, 1986. — 16 s.
11. Bulygina T.V., Shmelev А.D. Аnomalii v tekste: problemy interpretatsii // Logicheskij analiz yazyka: Protivorechivost' i anomal'nost' teksta. — M., 1990. — S. 103—104.
12. Verbitskaya O.Yu. Opyt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya paradoksal'nogo rechevogo akta v komicheskom diskurse: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Irkutsk, 2005.
13. Ganeev B.T. Paradoks: paradoksal'nye vyskazyvaniya. — Ufa: Izd-vo BGPU, 2001. — 400 s.
14. Zabotina E.N. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie struktur paradoksa v sovremennykh anglijskikh sketchakh: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Sankt-Peterburg, 2012. — 24 s.
15. Kravchenko O.V. Yavleniya yazykovogo absurda v khudozhestvennykh tekstakh: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. — Taganrog, 2010.
16. Selіvanova O.O. Paremіologіchnі paradoksi v ukraїnskіj movі // Narisi z ukraїns'koї frazeologії (psikhokognіtivnij ta etnokul'turnij aspekti). — Cherkasi: Brama, 2004. — 276 s.
17. Hymes D. Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life // Directions in Sociolinguistics: the Ethnography of Communication. — New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972. — P. 35—71.
18. Sannikov V.Z. Russkij yazyk v zerkale yazykovoj igry. — 2-e izd. — M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2002. — 552 s.
19. Paducheva E.V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost' s dejstvitel'nost'yu. — M.: URSS, 2001. — 287 s.
20. Klyuev E.V. Rechevaya kommunikatsiya: ucheb. posobie dlya un-tov i in-tov. — M.: Prior, 1998. — 224 s.
21. Zanerv D. Odesskij ledokol // Sajt M.M. Zhvanetskogo. — [URL]: http://www.jvanetsky.ru/data/text/pf/odessky_ledokol/.
22. Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i ehstetiki: Issledovaniya raznykh let. — M.: Khudozhestvennaya lit-ra, 1975. — 502 s.