.png)
UDC 811.351`28
DOI 10.20339/PhS.5-26.162
Mallaeva Zulaykhat M.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Chief Researcher
G. Tsadasa Institute of Language, Literature and Art of
the Dagestan Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Makhachkala, Russia)
http://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-4303-6663
e-mail: logika55@mail.ru
Khanbalaeva Sabina N.,
Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor of
the Department of the English Language,
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University) (Moscow, Russian Federation)
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8142-2074
e-mail: sabinamgimo@mail.ru
Thе article attempts to analyze invectives, a less-studied part of the emotive vocabulary in Dagestanian studies. The study of language from linguacultural and communicative-pragmatic perspectives is no less important than the study of its structural organization. Pragmatic and cultural approaches to language research make it possible to identify how speakers of different ethnic cultures perceive the same facts and realities of the physical world. The material for the study was the invective speech formulas of one of the previously unexplored and disappearing subdialects of the Andalal dialect of the Avar language. The object of attention in the presented article is lexemes and phraseological units containing a negative characterization of a person based on their distinctive intellectual and physical qualities and properties. The relevance of the study is due to the steady decrease in the number of speakers of the Shangoda subdialect, which creates threat of loss the dialect’s invective vocabulary. It is this layer of language that most clearly reflects the value systems inherent in ethnic group.
Keywords: Avar language, Shangoda subdialect, invective speech formulas, pragmatic and cultural approaches
References
1. Zhelvis V.I. Invektiva: opyt tematicheskoi i funktsional’noi klassifikatsii // Etnicheskie stereotipy povedeniia / pod red. A.K. Baburina. Leningrad: Nauka, 1985. S. 304 –307.
2. Khaibulaeva M.M. Frazeologizmy s invektivnoi semantikoi (na materiale avarskogo iazyka) // Izvestiia DGPU. 2018. T. 12, No. 4. S. 110–113.
3. Zhelvis V.I. Pole brani. Skvernoslovie kak sotsial’naia problema v iazykakh i kul’turakh mira Moscow: Ladomir, 2001. 349 s.
4. Bogdanova L.I. Chelovek v zerkale zoomorfnoi metafory // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 19: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia. 2023. T. 26, No. 2. S. 24–40.
5. Vakhitova D.K. Invektivnaia leksika tatarskogo iazyka: funktsional’nyi i etnomental’nyi aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Kazan’, 2013. 24 s.
6. Faizullina A.G. Invektivy-kompozity v sistemno-funktsional’nom aspekte: na materiale nemetskogo, russkogo i tatarskogo iazykov: avtoref. dis. … dr. filol. nauk. Cheboksary, 2009. 46 s.
7. Etnolingvisticheskii aspekt regional’nogo iazykovogo soznaniia / O.V. Baliasnikova, G.A. Cherkasova, A.A. Stepanova, N.V. Ufimtseva // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Teoriia iazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. 2017. T. 8, No. 4. S. 1161–1170.