.png)
UDC 82.09
DOI 10.20339/PhS.6s-25.182
Kosenko Victoria S.,
Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Stage Speech Department
Russian Institute of Theatrical Art
e-mail: visha-k@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5533-8748
Markova Elena A.,
Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Foreign Languages Department
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: abellen@yandex.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-7747
Bekmuratova Aigerim E.,
Senior Lecturer of the Practical English Department
Abay Kazakh National Pedagogical University (Almaty, Kazakhstan)
e-mail: aigerim375@mail.ru
Based on the studies in the field of cultural interaction by Yu.M. Lotman, B.F. Egorov, G.D. Gachev, U.M. Bakhtikireeva considers cases of frontier space: the play “Ecstasy with Pomegranate” from the repertoire of the Tashkent theater “Ilkhom” (directed by Mark Weil); the cultural feat of the Hungarian philologist Arminius Vambery, who incognito made a dangerous journey to Central Asia in the XIX century; the journey to Uzbekistan of the hero of Andrei Bitov’s story (“One Country”); blocked cases of penetration into a foreign world in the stories “Uzgen” by V. Muratkhanov and “Sunnat” by Sukhbatanov. Muratkhanov and Sukhbat Aflatuni’s “Sunnat”. The deeds of real historical personalities (the artist A.V. Nikolaev, who became the prototype of the hero in the play “Ecstasy with Pomegranate”, and the traveler Arminius Vamberi) and literary heroes are correlated with two frontier paradigms: “searching for one’s own” and ‘searching for the alien’, as well as their position — outsider (external) and insider (internal) — in relation to the alien world. The considered examples, acting as universals for the frontier zone, can serve in literary analysis as an algorithm of behavior of previous cases of cultural interaction, present and future. The given examples of the case of “block out” can become a kind of “revision” in the receptive analysis of a number of past historical-literary travelogues.
Keywords: intercultural interaction, frontier, Arminij Vamberi, A.V. Nikolaev (Usto Mumin), Andrey Bitov, Sukhbat Aflatuni, Vadim Muratkhanov, the play “Ecstasy with Pomegranate”, Central Asia
References
1. Terner F.Dzh. Frontir v amerikanskoi istorii / per. s angl. A.I. Petrenko. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 2009. 304 s.
2. Egorov B.F. Russkii kharakter // Ot Khomiakova do Lotmana / B.F. Egorov. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2003. S. 11–34.
3. Egorov B.F. Natsional’noe svoeobrazie russkoi kritiki // Ot Khomiakova do Lotmana / B.F. Egorov. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2003. S. 35–53.
4. Andreeva A.A. «Frontir» kak kul’turno-istoricheskaia kategoriia // Vestnik Maikopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2014. No. 3. S. 11–15.
5. Egorov B.F. O slozhnostiakh mezhnatsional’nykh otnoshenii // Ot Khomiakova do Lotmana / B.F. Egorov. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2003. S. 54–64.
6. Gachev G.D. Natsional’nye obrazy mira: kurs lektsii. Moscow: Akademiia, 1998. 432 s.
7. Lotman Iu.M. K postroeniiu teorii vzaimodeistviia kul’tur (semioticheskii aspekt) // Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 1: Stat’i po semiotike i topologii kul’tury. Tallin: Aleksandra, 1992. S. 110–120.
8. Radenie s granatom: spektakl’ teatra «Il’khom» / rezh. Mark Vail’, Dm. Tikhomirov. Tashkent, 2006. URL: https://yandex.ru/video/preview/17541731825478852068 (01.04.2025).
9. Shafranskaia E.F. Usto Mumin: prevrashcheniia. Moscow: Muzei sovremennogo iskusstva «Garazh», 2023. 304 s.
10. Artua K. (Artykov K.). Mark Vail’. Poslednie teatral’nye stranitsy // Druzhba narodov. 2019. No. 8. S. 190–200.
11. Vamberi A. Puteshestvie po Srednei Azii / pod red., predisl. V.A. Romodina; per. s nem. Z.D. Golubevoi. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2003. 320 s.
12. Bitov A.G. Bol’shoi shar. Leningrad: Sovetskii pisatel’, 1963. 216 s.
13. Shafranskaia E.F., Garipova G.T. Lokal’nye teksty v russkoi literature. Moscow: Iurait, 2022. 109 s.
14. Shafranskaia E.F. «Tashkentskii front» (na materiale fol’klornoi povsednevnosti i literatury) // Vestnik slavianskikh kul’tur. 2021. No. 62. S. 232–245. DOI 10.37816/2073-9567-2021-62-232-245.
15. Lamazhaa Ch.K.O., Bakhtikireeva U.M. «Prokliatye zhizni» i tsennostnyi krizis v tuvinskom obshchestve // Novye issledovaniia Tuvy. 2022. No. 1. S. 266–275. DOI 10.25178/nit.2022.1.18.
16. Bakhtikireeva U.M., Shagimgereeva B.E., Amalbekova M.B. Poznanie samikh sebia cherez poznanie kul’tury svoego etnosa // Novye issledovaniia Tuvy. 2023. No. 4. S. 226–236. DOI 10.25178/nit.2023.4.16.
17. Malinovskii B. Nauchnaia teoriia kul’tury / per. s angl. I.V. Utekhina; sost. i vstup. st. A.K. Baiburina. Moscow: OGI, 2005. 184 s.
18. Radin P. Trikster: issledovaniia mifov severoamerikanskikh indeitsev / komment. K.G. Iunga, K.K. Keren’i; per. s angl. V.V. Kiriushchenko. St. Petersburg: Evraziia, 1999. 288 s.
19. Muratkhanov V. Uzgen: rasskaz // Znamia. 2024. No. 11. S. 65–68.
20. Aflatuni S. Sunnat: rasskaz // Priiut dlia bezdomnykh kaktusov / S. Aflatuni. Moscow: Eksmo, 2021. S. 318–330.