.png)
Lyubarsky Ruslan V.,
Candidate of Philology,
Teacher of Russian Language and Literature
MBOU Secondary School No. 57 in Bryansk
e-mail: ludmila12a@rambler.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9129-0124
A fantasy work is characterized by an anomalous artistic world. It is based on mythological facts, an anomalous chronotope, an individual author’s interpretation of the myth, etc. A special place is occupied by fantasy secondary conventions in the work of Natalia O’Shea (Helavisa). The subject of the research is the specifics of the reproduction of fantasy reality in the works of Helavisa. The purpose of the article is to explore the specifics of recreating the fantasy world in Helavisa’s album “Luciferaza” and the story “The Chronicles of Luciferaza. Three ships”. Comparative historical and typological methods are used in the work. The article examines the dual nature of Luciferase in the context of the album of the same name, combining the contrast of light and darkness are explored. Mythological characters are investigated as components of the denoted reality of rock poetry and the story of Helavisa. The syncretism of the mythopoetic space of the album and the story is emphasized on the basis of the identity of the artistic adaptation of mythological elements. The anomalous chronotope of Helavisa’s works, which forms the space and time of Luciferase, is investigated. The functional feature of the songs of “Luciferaza” is studied in the context of the fantasy reality of the story “The Chronicles of Luciferaza. Three ships”. It is concluded that the allusions in the text of the story, contextually related to the mention of the planet’s involvement in Alchemeira and entering into an artistic dialogue with rock poetry, transform Luciferase into an unsteady secondary fantasy reality expanding to galactic scales.
Кeywords: Helavisa, album “Luciferaza”, novel “Chronicles of Luciferaza. Three ships”, chronotope, anomalous artistic world
References
1. Diakonova E.S. Konstruirovanie edinogo prostranstva khudozhestvennogo anomal’nogo mira v proizvedeniiakh zhanra fentezi // Vestnik IGLU. 2008. No. 1. S. 10–16.
2. Cherkasov I.E. Mifologicheskii znak s pozitsii antropotsentrizma // Antropotsentrizm v iazyke i rechi: mezhvuzovskii sb. nauch. tr. St. Petersburg, 2003. S. 174–182.
3. Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Moscow, 1975. 504 s.
4. Dmitriev V.A. Realizm i khudozhestvennaia uslovnost’. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’, 1974. 279 s.
5. Antonova M.V., Fedorchuk M.A. Spetsifika prostranstva v romanticheskom fentezi // Iazyk i tekst. 2022. T. 9. No. 2. S. 41–47.
6. Popova G.V. Organizatsiia khudozhestvennogo mira fantasticheskogo proizvedeniia: kategorial’nye poniatiia (na materiale dilogii O. Gromyko «God krysy») // Nauchnyi dialog. 2021. No. 9. S. 200–216.
7. Kovtun E.N. «Intertekst mira posmertiia» v fantastike XX–XXI vv.: funktsional’nost’ khudozhestvennoi modeli // Studia Litterarum. 2022. T. 7. No. 4. S. 34–53.
8. Gogoleva S.A. Drugie miry: traditsii i tipologiia zhanra fentezi // Nauka i obrazovanie. 2006. No. 3. S. 85–88.
9. Putilo A.O., Putilo O.O. Khudozhestvennoe prostranstvo pravoslavnogo fentezi (na materiale tsikla D. Emtsa «Shnyr») // Tserkov’. Bogoslovie. Istoriia. 2021. No. 2. S. 352– 361.
10. Sergeev A.A. Religii vymyshlennykh mirov: religioznost’ i fantastika, vazhnost’ analiza religioznoi sostavliaiushchei v sovremennykh proizvedeniiakh fantastiki i fentezi // Tserkov’. Bogoslovie. Istoriia: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch.-bogoslov. konf., posviashchennoi Soboru novomuchenikov i ispovednikov Tserkvi Russkoi. 2016. S. 268– 274.
11. Khelavisa. Liutsiferaza (2018). URL: https://melnitsa.info/portfolio/luciferaza/ (08.05.2024).
12. Ob ustroistve planety Liutsiferazy. URL: http://helavisa.ru/ob_ustroistve_planety_luciferaza/ (08.05.2024).
13. Interv’iu s Khelavisoi: «Ob ogne, vetre i besstrashii». URL: https://dzen.ru/a/XkvYtHGM-VYg_xk8 (08.05.2024).
14. Eremenko E.E. Literaturnye sredstva sozdaniia tselostnoi kontseptsii muzykal’nogo al’boma // Vestnik molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Samarskogo universiteta. 2021. No. 2 (19). S. 10–13.
15. O`Shei N. Khroniki Liutsiferazy. Tri korablia. Moscow: Laivbuk, 2020. 192 s.
16. Khazankovich Iu.G. Mifologicheskii kod v poeme Georgiia Porotova «Krylatyi Kutkh, ili Pesn’ o liubvi» // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2020. T. 13. No. 2. S. 57–60.
17. Osipovskii S.N. Vliianie sovremennogo obshchestva na religioznye protsessy na primere evoliutsii religii vudu // Visnik SevNTU. 2012. No. 126. S. 189–193.
18. Melnichenko S.S. Otrazhenie dialoga kul’tur v folk-rok-tekste: na primere obraza drakona / zmei v tvorchestve gruppy «Mel’nitsa» // Mir glazami molodykh: sb. nauch. tr. VI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. onlain-konf. Kursk, 2023. S. 426–428.
19. Zaitsev Iu. Mify Drevnei Gretsii. Moscow, 2008. 143 s.
20. Mel’nitsa. Khimera (2016). URL: https://melnitsa.info/portfolio/himera/ (08.05.2024).
21. Mel’nitsa. Alkhimiia (2015).URL: https://melnitsa.info/portfolio/alchemy/ (08.05.2024).