Your shopping cart is empty.
Log in

Linguistic and cultural specificity of the image of Russian man in the short po-ems and poems of the Turkish poet Nazim Hikmet Ran (lexico-semantic aspect)

M.G. Dogan, V.P. Sinyachkin
80,00 ₽

UDC 81`42:821.512.12-1

DOI 10.20339/PhS.6s-23.154

 

Dogan Merve G.,

Candidate of Pedagogy, Assistant of the Russian Language and

Intercultural Communication Department

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba

e-mail: dogan_mg@pfur.ru

Sinyachkin Vladimir P.,

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Russian Language

and Intercultural Communication Department

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba

e-mail: word@list.ru

 

The article is devoted to the study of short poems and poems by the Turkish poet Nazim Hikmet Ran (1902–1963), reflecting the images of Russian man. Russian’s image is represented in the works of the Turkish poet; observations, representations and impressions of the Turkish poet about the Soviet people of the first half of the 20th century are analyzed in the article; the languacultural specifity of the image of the Russian people are studied; the correlation of the image of the Russian man created by the Turkish poet with the archetypes of Soviet culture is revealed. The purpose of this article is to identify the languacultural specificity of the image of Russian people in the work of Nazim Hikmet Ran. The research material was short poems and poems written by the poet during his stay in the Soviet Russia in the period 1921–1928 and his emigration to the USSR in the period 1951–1963. The research methods of this article are lexico-semantic analysis, languacultural analysis, complex analysis and observation method. As a result of the analysis of the texts of short poems and poems by Nazim Hikmet Ran, lexical units that construct the image of a Russian person in the poetic picture of the world of the Turkish poet are revealed.

Keywords: image, Russian people, Soviet people, short poems, poems, Turkish poetry, Nazim Hikmet Ran, languaculture.

 

References

1. Katermina V.V. Natsional’no-kul’turnaia spetsifika obraza cheloveka: na materiale russkogo i angliiskogo iazykov: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Volgograd, 2005.

2. Kutaf’eva N.V., Iao Sun. Obraz russkikh v kitaiskoi i iaponskoi lingvokul’turakh (na materiale zoomorfnoi metafory) // Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Istoriia, filologiia. 2021. T. 20. No. 4. S. 158–168.

3. Metel’skaya E.V. Obraz cheloveka v angliiskoi i russkoi substandartnoi lingvokul’turakh: na materiale zoonimov angliiskogo i russkogo iazykov: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Piatigorsk, 2012.

4. Mirsaetova L.A. Obraz cheloveka vo frazeologicheskoi kartine mira v tatarskom i russkom iazykakh: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Ufa, 2004.

5. Smirnov I.M. Obraz uspeshnogo cheloveka v russkoi i amerikanskoi lingvokul’turakh: gendernyi aspekt: (na materiale tekstov SMI): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 2018.

6. Khairullina R.Kh., Berger V.P. Obraz cheloveka v mifologicheskoi kartine mir (na materiale russkogo, kazakhskogo i angliiskogo iazykov). DOI 10.24833/2410-2423-2018-2-14-61-67 // Filologicheskie nauki v MGIMO. 2018. No. 2 (14). S. 61–67.

7. Chernova S.V. Semantika slova “obraz” v russkom iazyke // Iazyk. Tekst. Diskurs: nauchnyi al’manakh Stavropol’skogo otdeleniia RALK / pod red. prof. G.N. Manaenko. Vyp. 12. Ch. 2. Stavropol’: Izd-vo SKFU, 2014. S. 187–196.

8. Apresian Yu.D. Obraz cheloveka po dannym iazyka: popytka sistemnogo opisaniia // Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 1995. No. 1. S. 37–67.

9. Nikitina L.B. Obraz-kontsept “homo sapiens” v russkoi iazykovoi kartine mira kak ob”ekt antropotsentristskoi semantiki: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Omsk, 2006. 41 s.

10. Rozina R.I. Chelovek i lichnost’ v iazyke // Logicheskii analiz iazyka. Vyp. 4: Kul’turnye kontsepty. Moscow: Nauka, 1991.

11. Maslova V.A. Natsional’nyi kharakter skvoz’ prizmu iazyka. Moscow, 2011. 68 s.

12. Shmelev A.D. Leksicheskii sostav russkogo iazyka kak otrazhenie “russkoi dushi” // Kliuchevye idei russkoi iazykovoi kartiny mira: sb. st. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2005. 544 s.

13. Lonskaya A.Yu. Metafora v politicheskom diskurse rossiiskikh pe-chatnykh SMI kak instrument verbalizatsii lingvokul’turnykh realii (1991–2008 gg.) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2021. T. 14. Vyp. 9. S. 2689–2694.

14. Zaliznyak A.A., Levontina I.B., Shmelev A.D. Kliuchevye idei russkoi iazykovoi kartiny mira: sb. st. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2005. 544 s.

15. Simonov K.M. Istorii tiazhelaia voda // Sbornik memuarnoi prozy / sost. L.V. Lazarev. Moscow, 2005. S. 199–203.

16. Gregori Karlton. Na pokhoronakh zhivykh: teoriia “zhivogo cheloveka” i formirovanie geroia v rannem sotsrealizme // Sotsrealisticheskii kanon: sb. st. / pod obshch. red. H. Günther i E. Dobrenko. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000.

17. Nazim Hikmet. Stikhotvoreniia. Poemy. Moscow: IPTs Maska, 2013. 258 s.

18. Grinberg I. Geroi sovetskogo romana // Obraz bol’shevika: sb. kritich. st. / T. Trifonov, A. Dymshits, R. Messer, I. Grinberg. Leningrad, 1938.