Your shopping cart is empty.
Log in

 

PhS Library 
Issue 2 (December)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Language implementation of evaluation in Internet communication (based on the material of the news Instagram account of Tomsk)

Gritsenko Lubov M., Demidova Tatyana A., Salosina Irina V.
80,00 ₽

UDC 81`24

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.4-22.003               

 

Gritsenko Lubov M.,

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the

Russian Language Department of the School of Basic Engineering Training

Tomsk Polytechnic University

e-mail: lmg@tpu.ru

Demidova Tatyana A.,

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the

Russian Language Department of the School of Basic Engineering Training

Tomsk Polytechnic University

e-mail: demidtanya@tpu.ru

Salosina Irina V.,

Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor of the

Russian Language Department of the School of Basic Engineering Training

Tomsk Polytechnic University

e-mail: salosinaiv@tpu.ru

 

The paper deals with the various ways of the expression of evaluation in Internet communication. The research material is the Internet commentaries of Tomsk news Instagram blog, which is one of the popular genres of virtual discourse. The purpose of the study is to identify and study linguistic means of implementing evaluation in a news Instagram account. The material analysis made it possible to discover the most frequent means of expressing of evaluation (lexical units and syntactic constructions). The most frequent means of expressing evaluation (lexical units and syntactic constructions) were determined. The article analyzes and describes the main characteristics of the means of implementing/ realizing implicit and explicit evaluation. The main characteristics of the means of implementing implicit and explicit evaluation are analyzed and described. The article examines the peculiarities of the representation of negative and positive evaluation, taking into account the discursive specifics in the Internet blog. The peculiarities of the representation of negative and positive evaluation in an Internet blog are investigated, taking into account the discursive specifics. From this article it is concluded that the main mean the expression of evaluation is irony. Its main parameters are described. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the main means of expressing the evaluation is irony, its main parameters are described.

Keywords: virtual discourse, Internet communication, Instagram, Internet commentary, evaluation, implication, explicitness, irony.

 

References

1.         Rezanova Z.I., Mishankina N.A. Interpretatsionnyi potentsial novykh lingvisticheskikh ob’’ektov (na materiale internet-kommunikatsii) // Sibirskii filologicheskii zhurnal. 2004. No. 3–4. S. 109–113.

2.         Savel’eva I.V. Strategii vospriiatiia politicheskikh internet-statei avtorami kommentariev v internet-srede // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. No. 2-2 (54). S. 152–156.

3.         Zheltukhina M.R. Tropologicheskaia suggestivnost’ massmedial’nogo diskursa: o probleme rechevogo vozdeistviia tropov v iazyke SMI: monografiia. Moscow: In-t iazykoznaniia RAN; Volgograd: Izd-vo VF MUPK, 2003. 656 s.

4.         Kochetkova E.V. Iazykovye sredstva vyrazheniia negativnoi otsenki mira i cheloveka v poezii Igoria Severianina: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Khabarovsk, 2004. URL: http://www.poet-severyanin.ru/library/yazikovie-sredstva-virazheniya1.html (31.08.2021).

5.         Anisimova E.E. Lingvistika teksta i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia (na materiale kreolizovannykh tekstov). Moscow: Izdatel’skii tsentr “Akademiia”, 2003. 128 s.

6.         Kormilitsyna M.A. Sredstva sozdaniia emotsional’noi tonal’nosti gazetnogo teksta // Problemy rechevoi kommunikatsii: mezhvuz. cb. nauch. tr. / pod red. M.A. Kormilitsynoi, O.B. Sirotininoi. Saratov, 2005. Vyp. 5. S. 16–25.

7.         Kashkin V.B., Shilikhina K.M. Sushchestvuet li retsept ironii?: (na materiale russkogo i ital'ianskogo iazykov) // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2013. No. 3. S. 98–106.