.png)
UDC 81`27:39
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.3-22.042
Borgoyakova Tamara G.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Director of the
Institute of Humanitarian Studies and Sayan-Altai Turkology;
Professor of the Foreign Linguistics and Language Department
Katanov Khakass State University
e-mail: tamarabee@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0001-9958-9086
Guseinova Aurika V.,
Candidate of Philology, Senior Researcher of the
Institute of Humanitarian Studies and Sayan-Altai Turkology
Katanov Khakass State University
e-mail: aurika_guseynova@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0001-9708-114X
Pokoyakova Karina A.,
Candidate of Philology, Senior Researcher of the
Institute of Humanitarian Studies and Sayan-Altai Turkology
Katanov Khakass State University
e-mail: karina_p.84@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0001-6318-9435
The purpose of the article is to study the evaluative aspects of regional language policy in the republics of Southern Siberia in the context of the ethno-demographic structure of the population. The relevance of the topic is associated with the ongoing processes of language shift among speakers of the second state languages of the republics of Southern Siberia and the need to attract valid experimental data to identify the features of the development of national-Russian bilingualism. The identified positive attitude towards the development of official bilingualism is manifested in the prevalence of positive linguistic attitudes of respondents in relation to the state languages of the three republics. At the same time, there remains a noticeable ethnic differentiation of linguistic loyalty and tolerance, which correlates with the ethno-demographic parameters of the structure of their population. Representatives of the titular ethnic groups show a significantly higher level of interest in supporting the status and functioning of the second state languages of the republics in comparison with Russian respondents. The possibility of introducing their compulsory study at school receives more noticeable support from the respondents of the titular ethnic groups than the Russian respondents. The respondents of the titular nationalities consider the language policy in relation to the republican language to be more effective, but the Russian respondents more often experience difficulties in assessing it. The preservation of the stereotypes of the linguistic ideology of the assimilation orientation in relation to minority languages is manifested through the attitude of respondents to the republican languages, depending on their official and ethno-identification status.
Keywords: language policy, language loyalty, language attitudes, bilingualism, republics of Altai, Tuva, Khakassia.
Conflict of interests: none.
Funding: the study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research in the framework of the scientific project No. 20-012-00426 “Dynamics and prospects of languages interaction in the Republics of Southern Siberia”.
References
1. Bitkeeva A.N. Dinamika i perspektivy razvitiia iazykovoi situatsii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Sokhranenie i razvitie iazykov i kul’tur korennykh narodov Sibiri: materialy II Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Abakan, 24–25 maia 2018 g.) / otv. red. T.G. Borgoiakova. Abakan: Izd-vo KhGU im. N.F. Katanova, 2018. S. 10–12.
2. Golovko E.V. Sovremennaia iazykovaia politika i problema sokhraneniia iazykovogo i kul’turnogo raznoobraziia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Sokhranenie i razvitie iazykov i kul’tur korennykh narodov Sibiri: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Abakan, 19–20 maia 2016 g.) / otv. red. T.G. Borgoiakova. Abakan: Izd-vo KhGU im. N.F. Katanova, 2016. S. 9–12.
3. Alpatov V.M. Iazykovaia politika i rodnoi iazyk // Sotsiolingvistika. 2020. No. 3 (3). S. 114–124. DOI 10.37892/2713-2951-2020-3-3-114-124.
4. Kibrik A.A. Sokhranenie iazykovogo raznoobraziia Rossii: kontury programmy // Sotsiolingvistika. 2020. No. 1 (1). S. 17–28. DOI 10.37892/2713-2951-2020-1-1-17-28.
5. Cooper R. Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 228 p. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511620812.
6. Daoust D. Language planning and language reform // The Handbook of Sociolinguistics / ed. Florian Coulmas. Oxford: Blackwell, 2017. P. 436–452. DOI 10.1002/9781405166256.CH27.
7. Slovar’ sotsiolingvisticheskikh terminov / otv. red. V.Yu. Mikhal’chenko. Moscow: Institut iazykoznaniia RAN, 2006. 312 s.
8. Mikhal’chenko V.Iu. Nerealizovannyi potentsial sotsiolingvistiki XX v. // Sotsiolingvistika. 2020. No. 1 (1). S. 29–33. DOI 10.37892/2713-2951-2020-1-1-29-33.
9. Borgoiakova T.G. Sotsiolingvisticheskie protsessy v respublikakh Iuzhnoi Sibiri. Abakan: Izd-vo KhGU im. N.F. Katanova, 2002. 166 s.
10. Borgoiakova T.G. Iazykovaia politika v respublikakh Iuzhnoi Sibiri: Altai, Tyva, Khakasiia // Iazykovaia politika v kontekste sovremennykh iazykovykh protsessov / otv. red. A.N. Bitkeeva. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2015. S. 118–132.
11. Dyrkheeva G.A., Tsybenova Ch.S. Iazykovye ustanovki i iazykovaia loial’nost’ nositelei malykh iazykov v usloviiakh natsional’no-russkogo dvuiazychiia (na primere buriat i tuvintsev) // Novye issledovaniia Tuvy. 2020. No. 1. S. 62–74. URL: https://nit.tuva.asia/nit/article/view/905 (18.10.2021). DOI 10.25178/nit.2020.1.5.
12. Ivanova N.I. Sotsiolingvisticheskie aspekty funktsionirovaniia iakutskogo iazyka v g. Iakutske: tsifry i fakty / otv. red. P.A. Sleptsov. Moscow: Iazyki Narodov Mira, 2017. 260 s.
13. Iazykovoe soznanie i iazykovye ustanovki zhitelei prigranichnykh regionov vostoka Rossii (na primere Respubliki Buriatiia i Zabaikal’skogo kraia) / E.V. Khilkhanova, G.A. Dyrkheeva, L.M. Liubimova, D.B. Sundueva. Moscow: Nauka: Vostochnaia literatura, 2016. 174 s.
14. Borgoiakova T.G., Guseinova A.V. Contextualized bilingualism in the republics of Southern Siberia // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2021. No. 14 (4). P. 466–477. DOI 10.17516/1997-1370-0734.
15. Borgoiakova T.G., Guseinova A.V. Status i funktsionirovanie tiurkskikh iazykov Iuzhnoi Sibiri. Abakan: Izd-vo KhGU im. N.F. Katanova, 2017. 136 s.
16. Arutiunova E.M. Iazykovye problemy v predstavleniiakh rossiian: aktualizatsiia i novye konteksty // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. 2020. No. 4 (158). S. 521–532. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.1266.
17. Borgoiakova T.G., Guseinova A.V. Otsenochnye aspekty iazykovoi politiki v mediinom diskurse respublik Iuzhnoi Sibiri // Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. 2021. No. 1. S. 21–27. DOI 10.20339/PhS.1-21.021.
18. Tishkov V.A., Akbaev Kh.M. “Narod ne umiraet s iazykom”, ili “Iazyk ne zhivet bez Naroda”? : dialog uchenykh o konflikte vokrug rodnogo iazyka // Smert’ iazyka — smert’ naroda? : iazykovye situatsii i iazykovye prava v Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstvakh / otv. red. E.I. Filippova, S.V. Sokolovskii. Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii im. N.N. Miklukho-Maklaia RAN: Goriachaia liniia — Telekom, 2019. 260 s. DOI 10.33876/978-5-9912-0836-9-2019-1-259.
19. Vakhtin N.B. Usloviia iazykovogo sdviga (k opisaniiu sovremennoi iazykovoi situatsii na Krainem Severe) // Vestnik molodogo uchenogo. 2001. No. 1. S. 11–16. URL: http://philology.ru/linguistics1/vakhtin-01.htm (15.10.2021).
20. Khilkhanova E.V. Faktory iazykovogo sdviga i sokhraneniia minoritarnykh iazykov: diskursnyi i sotsiolingvisticheskii analiz (na materiale iazykovoi situatsii v etnicheskoi Buriatii): avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Ulan-Ude, 2009