Correlation of speech research and functional stylistics: transdisciplinary approach to suggesting a hypothesis

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.5-20.013

Kotyurova Maria P.,

Doctor of Philology, Professor,

Perm State National Research University

e-mail: kotyurova@yandex.ru

The article represents a hypothesis about the correlation of terms “functional stylistics”, “discourse analysis”, “speech research”, “scientific functional style” and “individual scientific style”. The transdiscipline approach to suggesting a hypothesis is correlated with the use of different methodological items such as imposition, abstractiveness, gradualness, fractal based on dialectical logics, functional stylistics, stylistics of scientific individual speech, mathematics (geometry). The imposition relations are represented with the spherical model based on the anthropocentric approach which takes into account remoteness from man.

Keywords: transdiscipline approach, hypothesis, speech research, functional stylistics, spherical model, imposition relations, abstractiveness, fractal.

References

1. Bazhenova E.A. Diskursivno-stilisticheskii podkhod k izucheniiu nauchnogo teksta // Stylistyka. Opole. 2005. T. XIV. S. 317–334.

2. Belozerova N.N. Mir real’nyi i mir virtual’nyi: dve ekologicheskie sistemy? Tiumen’: Izd-vo Tiumen. gos. un-ta, 2010. 252 s.

3. Goncharova E.A. Lingvostilisticheskii aspekt interpretatsii egotsentricheskikh tekstovykh struktur // Stylistyka. Opole. 2005. T. XIV. S. 175–189.

4. Kartsev V.P. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia nauki i problemy istoriko-nauchnykh issledovanii. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 308 s.

5. Kozhina M.N. Rechevedenie i funktsional’naia stilistika: voprosy teorii // Izbrannye trudy. Perm’, 2002. 475 s.

6. Kostomarov V.G. Novyi vzgliad na stilistiku // Mir russkogo slova. 2019. No. 1. S. 21–24.

7. Kotiurova M.P. Differance kak epistemicheskaia metafora v nauchnom stile rechi // Book of Abstracts International Simposium “Metaphor as Means of Knowledge Communication”. Perm State University, 10–14 Oсtober, 2016. Р. 168–169.

8. Kotiurova M.P., Tikhomirova L.S., Solov’eva N.V. Idiostilistika nauchnoi rechi. Nashi predstavleniia o rechevoi individual’nosti uchenogo. Perm’, 2011. 340 s.

9. Riabtseva N.K. Prikladnye problemy perevodovedeniia: lingvisticheskii aspekt: uch. posobie. Moscow: FLINTA: Nauka. 2013. 224 s.

10. Tarasenko V.V. Fraktal. URL: http://www/philosophy.ru/library/fin/www.iph.ras.ru/vtar/.

11. Cherniavskaia V.E. Vydvizhenie novogo znaniia v strukture publikatsii (na materiale nauchno-issledovatel’skoi stat’i po lingvistike) // Filologicheskie nauki. NDVSh. 2017. No. 5. S. 99–107.