.png)
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.3-20.040
Belozerova Alexandra V.,
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor
of the English Philology Department
Ivanovo State University
e-mail: belozerova.alexandra@gmail.com
Conflict interaction offers a vast field for linguistic studies. The given article runs about conflict in general and its portrayal in English fiction. Conflicts are viewed as open (explicit) and latent (implicit). The latter lacks linguistic research so the further study is definitely of high interest. It is also noted in the article that via the latest findings of Pragmalinguistics and its communicative method the analysis of any implicit conflict should be conducted simultaneously both on verbal and non-verbal levels of speech. Combining both verbal and non-verbal levels of communicative interaction, the article illustrates features specific to an implicit conflict. Among them are the disguise of an emotional state of a speaker, non-authenticity and absence of verbal aggression. The latter also permits us to state that negative emotions are manifested mainly non-verbally. As a part of an analysis of the implicit conflict, conflict triggers (both verbal and non-verbal) are also described in the article. Verbal conflict triggers bear no sign of negative emotions or aggression and serve as such only due to the difference of illocutive aims of speakers. Controlled non-verbal components of communication and specific non-verbal actions can function as a non-verbal conflict trigger.
Keywords: non-verbal communication, communicative conflict, implicit conflict, non-verbal components of communication.
Referеnces
1. Obeliunas N.V. Predposylki vozniknoveniia konflikta interpretatsii v publitsisticheskom tekste // Vestnik NGU. Seriia: Istoriia, filologiia. 2012. T. 11. Vyp. 6. S. 99–103.
2. Rastishevskaia E.V. O iavlenii kommunikativnogo konflikta // Mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia i professional’no orientirovannoe obuchenie inostrannym iazykam: materialy III Mezhdunar. nauchn. konfer. Minsk, 2009. S. 48–50.
3. Tret’iakova V.S. Rechevaia konfliktologiia: problemy, zadachi, perspektivy // Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Cheliabinsk, 2013. No. 1 (292). S. 279–282.
4. Shcherbinina Iu.V. Rechevaia agressiia. Territoriia vrazhdy. Moscow, 2013. 398 s.
5. Golev N.D. Rechevoi konflikt v aspekte mnozhestvennosti interpretatsii rechevykh proizvedenii (na materiale russkikh igrovykh tekstov) // Bytie v iazyke: sbornik nauchnykh trudov 80-letiiu V.I. Zhel’visa. Iaroslavl’, 2011. S. 299–314.
6. Kreidlin G.E., Pereverzeva S.I. Otnosheniia mezhdu liud’mi i ikh otrazhenie v verbal’nom i neverbal’nom kommunikativnom povedenii // Konflikt v iazyke i kommunikatsii. Sbornik statei. Moscow, 2011. S. 67–83.
7. Vansiatskaia E.A. Emotsii v neverbal’nom povedenii detei. (Na materiale angloiazychnykh khudozhestvennykh tekstov). Ivanovo, 2016. 162 s.
8. Kartashkova F.I. Psikhofiziologicheskie reaktsii cheloveka i ikh otrazhenie v angliiskom tekste. Ivanovo, 2015. 106 s.
9. Khlystova V.G. Funktsional’no-strukturnaia i semanticheskaia kharakteristika kinematicheskikh rechenii, otrazhaiushchikh kommunikativnyi aspekt kinesiki: na materiale angliiskogo iazyka: Avtoref. dis. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. filol. nauk. Nizhnii Novgorod, 2005.
10. Deutsch M., Coleman P.T., Marcus E.C. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, 2006.
11. Kartashkova F.I. Verbal’nye i neverbal’nye komponenty kommunikatsii v angloiazychnom khudozhestvennom tekste // Voprosy psikholingvistiki 3(21). Institut iazykoznaniia RAN. M., 2014. S. 108–113.
12. Larsson S. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Stockholm, 2008. 480 p.
13. Hailey A. The Evening News. NY, 2001. 580 p.
14. Perry T. Daddy’s Girls. London, 2007. 612 p.
15. Egides A.P. Psikhologiia konflikta. Moscow, 2011. 320 s.
16. Perry T. Gold Diggers. London, 2007. 592 p.
17. Macintyre M. Whirligig. London, 2013. 304 p.