.png)
Alena Kalechyts ,
Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Slavic Philology Department
Konstantin Filosof University in Nitra (Nitra, Slovakia)
e-mail: akalechyts@ukf.sk
In the presented work, the text is considered from the point of view of triangulation as an innovative integrative approach to research in order to synthesize the results of accumulated knowledge and describe the cognitive-linguistic and axiolinguistic models of the text trying to separate from its pragmalinguistic analysis. The effectiveness of the triangulation method is associated with overcoming the limitations in studying complex objects and obtaining the most complete knowledge about them. We consider the text to be the same objects of study, since there are still ambiguous interpretations of its understanding and different views on aspects of analysis among scientists. The paper presents the synthesis, integration and interdisciplinary features of the text, observed primarily from the point of view of pragmalinguistics, cognitive science and axiology. This approach was chosen for a reason, since the listed scientific disciplines have a common interpretation of understanding, namely, they are based on the ideas of anthropocentrism, in which the main thing is considered to be a person – speaking, thinking, acting. Accordingly, this study focuses primarily on the subject of the text. The integration of the obtained data implies both the differentiation and generalization of cognitive-linguistic, axiolinguistic and pragmalinguistic models of text research, which have theoretical (in the future, the creation of a common text model) and practical significance (the possibility of using text linguistics and text analysis in university classes).
Keywords: axiolinguistic text model, discourse, integrative (triangulatory) approach to text, cognitive-linguistic text model, text linguistics, model, pragmalinguistic text model, text subject, text, triangulation
This work was carried out within the decision of the VEGA project 1/0456/25 Anthropocentric paradigm of pragmatics of text as discourse (01/2025 — 12/2028).
References
1. Evel’kin G.M. Osnovy kognitivnogo analiza rechi i teksta: monografiia. Minsk: A.N. Varaksin, 2022. 300 s.
2. Filippova D.Iu. Analiz teorii teksta pri pomoshchi postroeniia modeli // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. No. 3 (45). S. 202–205.
3. Tepliashina A.N., Erofeeva I.V., Boguslavskaia V.V., Tolstokulakova Iu.V. Teoriia i praktika modelirovaniia mediateksta: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2024. 240 s.
4. Krátky slovník slovenského jazyka. Bratislava: VEDA, Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, 2003. 985 s.
5. Kalechits A. Pragmaticheskaia model’ issledovaniia teksta s proektsiei na govoriashchego // Przegląd Kusycystyczny. 2024. No. 4 (188). S. 198–218.
6. Kubriakova E.S. V poiskakh sushchnosti iazyka: kognitivnye issledovaniia. Moscow: Znak, 2012. 208 s.
7. Schwarzová M. Úvod do kognitivní lingvistiky. Praha: Dauphin, 2009. 208 s.
8. Sokol A., Sokolová J. Od textu k porozumeniu. Sondy do predikcie porozumenia vzdelávaciemu textu. Nitra: Garmond Nitra, 2024. 199 s.
9. Baranov A.G. Kogniotipichnost’ teksta (k probleme urovnei abstraktsii tekstovoi deiatel’nosti) // Gol’din V.E. Zhanry rechi. Saratov, 1997. S. 4–12.
10. Mistrík J. Štylistika. vyd. Bratislava: VEDA, vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, 2021. 600 s.
11. Slančová D. Textová štylistika. Úvod do štúdia interaktívnej štylistiky. 2 vyd. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity a Prešove, 2024. S. 371–448.
12. Van Deik T.A. Iazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiia: sb. rabot / per. s angl. pod red. V.I. Gerasimova. Moscow: Progress, 1989. 310 s.
13. Gal’perin I.R. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniia. Moscow: URSS, 2020. 144 s.
14. Bolotnova N.S. Metodiki smyslovogo i lingvopragmaticheskogo analiza mediateksta: ucheb. posobie. 2-e izd., ster. Moscow: Flinta, 2019. 156 s.
15. Boguslavskaia V.V. Modelirovanie teksta: lingvosotsiokul’turnaia kontseptsiia. Analiz zhurnalistskikh tekstov. Moscow: Liumin Komplit Inzhiniring, 2017. 280 s.
16. Masalova S.I. Tekst kak kognitivnaia model’ mental’noi i rechevoi deiatel’nosti poznaiushchego sub”ekta // Littera et lingua. 2011. No. 8. S. 144–149.
17. Romanova T.V. Kognitivnyi analiz teksta: rabota nad metodologicheskimi oshibkami // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty rechevoi deiatel’nosti. 2013. No. 1 (8). S. 170–181.
18. Tarasova I. Tekst: urovni ponimaniia i urovni smysla // Acta universitatis Lodziensis. Folia linguistica rossica. 2019. No. 17. S. 87–98.
19. Ogneva E.A. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie kontseptosfery khudozhestvennogo teksta. 2-e izd., dop. Moscow: Editus, 2013. 282 s.
20. Fedotova O.S. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie kak metod poznaniia i izucheniia ob”ekta v nauchnykh issledovaniiakh // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. No. 4 (46). S. 199–202.
21. Iung K.G., Khenderson Dzh.L., Iakobi I. Chelovek i ego simvoly / per. s angl. S.N. Sirenko, N.A. Sirenko. Moscow: Medkov, 2022. 352 s.
22. Arutiunova N.D. Tipy iazykovykh znachenii. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 338 s.
23. Baranov A.G. Dinamicheskie tendentsii v issledovanii teksta // Stylistyka IV. 2021. S. 54–69.
24. Erofeeva I.V. Aksiologiia mediateksta v rossiiskoi kul’ture (tsennostnaia refleksiia zhurnalistiki nachala XXI veka). Chita: ZabGGPU, 2009. 297 s.
25. Molodychenko E.N. Ob operatsionalizatsii kategorii «tsennost’» v tekstovom i diskursivnom analize: k voprosu o lingvisticheskoi aksiologii // Vestnik MGPU. Seriia: Filologiia. Teoriia iazyka. Iazykovoe obrazovanie. 2015. No. 3. S. 90–97.
26. Nefedov S.T. Iazyk otsenok: chto govoriat otsenki ob otsenivaiushchem sub”ekte // Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia: Iazyk i literatura. 2022. No. 1 (4). S. 821–838.
27. Nefedov S.T. Var’irovanie otsenki v kommunikativnykh praktikakh nauchnogo diskursa // Vestnik SPbGU. Seriia: Iazyk i literatura. 2021. No. 8 (4). S. 760–778.
28. Dolník J. Das axiologische Konzept und die axiologischen Wortfelder // Zeitschrift für Slawistik. 1994. No. 39 (4). S. 504–513.
29. Bodnárová M., Sokolová J.K., Klingová J., Slančová D. Textová štylistika. Úvod do štúdia interaktívnej štylistiky. 2 vyd. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity a Prešove, 2024. S. 449–478.
30. Mar’ianchik V.A. Aksiologicheskaia struktura mediapoliticheskogo teksta (lingvostilisticheskii aspekt): avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Arkhangelsk, 2013. 39 s.
31. Romanova T.V. Ideologemy i aksiologemy russkogo iazykovogo soznaniia kak otrazhenie konstant i dinamiki natsional’noi mental’nosti. N.Novgorod: DEKOM, 2019. 120 s.
32. Karpukhina V.N. Aksiologicheskie strategii tekstoporozhdeniia i interpretatsii teksta: na materiale stikhotvorenii R. Kiplinga i ikh perevodov na russkii iazyk: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Barnaul, 2001.
33. Kalechits A., Rudakova T., Nikitenko T., Gallo Ia. Russko-slovatsko-angliiskii ob”iasnitel’nyi slovar’ po mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii. Nitra: FF UKF v Nitre, 2022. 300 s.