.png)
Myskin Sergey V.,
Doctor of Philology, Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor,
Professor of the Directorate of Educational Programs
Moscow City University
e-mail: myskinsv@mgpu.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-6089
Kravtsov Lev G.,
Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor,
Head of the Laboratory “Designing Cultural-Historical
Models of Education”
Institute of Secondary Vocational Education named after K.D. Ushinsky Moscow City University
e-mail: kravtsovlg@mgpu.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-9290
The article systematizes and describes the key provisions of the author’s analysis of linguistic and non-linguistic causes of the sustainable functioning of destructive communication in modern society. The object of the analysis is aggressive and autoaggressive discourses. The relevance of the analysis follows from the stable attitude of destructive communication social acceptability among young people. To reveal the patterns, the authors use a multidisciplinary approach that includes the conceptual apparatus of linguistics, psycholinguistics, psychology and social psychology. The imperfection of the communication regulation system in the Internet space is a leading factor in the intensification of destructive communication.
The author proposed concept of a pathogenic text generalizing the whole variety of destructive texts. The discursive psychological approach based on the dialectical interpretation of aggressive and autoaggressive discourses. Literary and psychohermeneutic analysis demonstrated the presence of a constant speech structure of personality — a speech invariant. The cultural and historical concept of the psyche development allowed us to identify the conditions and the moment of formation of the speech invariant. The content of the speech invariant includes a hierarchical set of stratagems of dialectical, sophistic and eristic modes. The speech invariant of aggressive and autoaggressive discourses includes sophistic-eristic stratagems that stimulate the expressive-monological, influencing and counteracting power of speech on the opponent as an object.
Keywords: aggressive and autoaggressive discourses, destructive communication eristic stratagem, speech impact, speech invariant, pathogenic text
References
1. Kirilina A.V. Iazykovaia bezopasnost’ i globalistskaia standartizatsiia znaniia // Russkii iazyk kak osnova razvitiia lichnosti, natsional’no-kul’turnaia tsennost’ i ob’’ekt sistemy natsional’noi bezopasnosti: materialy kruglogo stola / pod red. V.G. Martynova. Moscow: Izdatel’skii tsentr RGU nefti i gaza imeni I.M. Gubkina, 2024. S. 24–35.
2. Myskin S.V., Tarasov E.F. K postanovke problemy patogennogo teksta // Lingvistika pervoi chetverti XXI veka: tendentsii, itogi i perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. Mezhdunar. mezhdistsiplinarnoi nauch. konf., Tver, 12–13 oktiabria 2023 g. Tver: TGU, 2023. S. 306–309.
3. Wetherell M., Potter J. Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretive repertoires // Analysing Everyday Explanation / A. Antaki. London: Sage, 1988.
4. Denisenko V.N., Chebotareva E.Yu. Sovremennye psikholingvisticheskie metody analiza rechevoi kommunikatsii. Moscow: RUDN, 2008. 258 s.
5. Myskin S.V., Berezhkovskaia E.L., Oltarzhevskaya L.E. Bezopasnaia shkola: monitoring i obespechenie bezopasnosti obrazovatel’noi sredy v srednei shkole. Moscow: Agentstvo sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh tekhnologii, 2023. 146 s.
6. Baudrillard J. Simuliakry i simuliatsii / per. s fr. A. Kachalova. Moscow: Postum, 2015. 240 s.
7. Myskin S.V. K postanovke problemy ‘patologii iazykovoi lichnosti’ // Organizatsionnaia psikholingvistika. 2023. No. 3 (23). S. 10–24.
8. Sternin I.A. Vvedenie v rechevoe vozdeistvie. Moscow: RGB, 2001. 252 s.
9. Lakoff R.T. Persuasive discourse and ordinary conversation, with examples of advertising // Analizing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Press, 1982. P. 25–42.
10. Issers O.S. Rechevoe vozdeistvie: ucheb. posobie dlia studentov. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2009. 224 s.
11. Komalova L.R. Diagnostika urovnia konfliktnosti predkonfliktnoi kommunikatsii (po prosodicheskim parametram) // Vestnik MGLU. 2009. No. 13 (592). S. 100–114.
12. Dotsenko E.L. Psikhologiia manipuliatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita. Moscow: MGU, 1997. 344 s.
13. Vygotsky L.S. O psikhologicheskikh sistemakh // Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. T. 1: Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. S. 109–131.
14. Fucks W. Mathematical theory of word-formation. London, 1955.
15. Morozov N.A. Lingvisticheskie spektry // Izvestiia Akademii nauk. Otdelenie russkogo iazyka i slovesnosti. 1915. Kn. 1–4. T. 20.
16. Meier H. Deutsche Sprachstatistik. Hildesheim, 1964.
17. Akhmanova O.S. O tochnykh metodakh issledovaniia iazyka. Moscow, 1961.
18. Fomenko V.P., Fomenko T.G. Avtorskii invariant russkikh literaturnykh tekstov // Metody kolichestvennogo analiza tekstov narrativnykh istochnikov. Mosocw: In-t istorii SSSR, 1983. S. 86–109.
19. Batov V.I. Po tu storonu slova: ocherki prikladnoi psikhogermenevtiki: ot Iisusa Khrista do Vladimira Vysotskogo. Moscow: MPA, 2001. 268 s.
20. Tarmazova I.G. Eristika kak kognitivno-semioticheskaia model’ deviantnoi diskursivnoi ritoriki: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow, 2021.
21. Aristotle. O sofisticheskikh oproverzheniiakh // Sochineniia: v 4 t. T. 2. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. S. 535–593.
22. Schopenhauer A. Eristika, ili Iskusstvo pobezhdat’ v sporakh. Moscow: Eksmo, 2020. 128 s.
23. Zaitsev A.V. Dialog: konflikt ili kooperatsiia? : (obzor tochek zreniia i innovatsionnaia paradigma upravleniia dialogom) // Konfliktologiia. Nota bene. 2016. No. 4. S. 257–266.
24. Kondakov I.V. “Smuta”: epokhi “bezvremen’ia” v istorii Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2002. No. 4. S. 55–67.
25. Asmolov A.G. Kognitivnyi stil’ lichnosti kak sredstvo razresheniia problemno-konfliktnykh situatsii // Kul’turno-istoricheskaia psikhologiia i konstruirovanie mirov. Voronezh: MODEK; Moscow: Institut prakticheskoi psikhologii, 1996. S. 550–552.
26. Kholodnaia M.A. Kognitivnye stili: o prirode individual’nogo uma. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2004. 384 s.
27. Karasik V.I. Iazykovye kliuchi. Volgograd, 2007. 520 s.
28. Hymes D.H. Models of the interaction of language and social life // Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972. P. 35–71.
29. Skovorodnikov A.P. Effektivnoe rechevoe obshchenie (bazovye kompetentsii): slovar’-spravochnik. Krasnoiarsk, 2014. 852 s.
30. Eemeren F. Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness empirical re-search concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. London; New York: Springer, 2009. 231 p.
31. Rozhdestvensky Yu.V. Teoriia ritoriki. Moscow: Dobrosvet, 1997. 597 s.