.png)
UDC 811(161.1+581)`27
Zhang Yanqiu,
Candidate of Philology,
Senior Lecturer of the Russian Language Department
Institute of Foreign Languages
Beijing Normal University (Beijing, China)
ORCID: 0000-0002-1674-7868
e-mail: yanqiu.zhang@mail.ru
The relevance of the study is due to the development of intercultural relations between Russian and Chinese societies, their interest in learning foreign languages. Russian and Chinese paremia with the road component, which have not been previously described, are considered from the standpoint of linguoculturology. The classification of Russian and Chinese proverbs with the road component from the point of view of verbalized cultural attitudes is presented. Particular attention is paid to stereotypical ideas about the road in two linguistic cultures. It has been established that cultural settings recorded in Russian and Chinese proverbs with the road component have more differences than similarities. It was found that common features are associated with the understanding of the road as a place for movement in the literal sense and as a way of life in a figurative sense. It has been established that in Russian proverbs the road is the path of a person, on which he must show wisdom, observe the law, and help his neighbor. In Chinese proverbs, a person is advised not to rush, gaining practical experience, and take care of his home. An associative experiment conducted with Russian and Chinese native speakers with the stimulus word the road revealed direct associations with the place of movement among Russian and Chinese respondents. In addition, Russians present the road as a way of life in interaction with other people, and the Chinese more often associate the road with ancient poetry, history, and the “One Belt, One Road” economic program.
Keywords: proverbs, cultural setting, linguoculturology, road, stereotypical ideas.
References
1. The interaction of language and culture in the research field: boundaries and prospects / J. Bartmiński, E. Berezovich, I. Vepreva, M. Kovshova // Quaestio Rossica. 2021. Vol. 9 (4). P. 1389–1408.
2. Teliya V.N. Pervoocherednye zadachi i metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniia frazeologicheskogo sostava iazyka v kontekste kul’tury // Frazeologiia v kontekste kul’tury. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1999. S. 13–24.
3. Pisarskaya T.R., Yakimenko N.E. Ustanovki kul’tury v lingvokul’turologii // Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiia nauki i tekhnologii. 2016. No. 3–4. S. 91–94.
4. Rezvani V. Otrazhenie krasoty zhenshchin v zerkale russkikh i persidskikh paremii // Vestnik AGTU. Ser.: Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye nauki. 2015. No. 2 (60). S. 89–93.
5. Kovshova M.L. Lingvokul’turologicheskii analiz idiom, zagadok, poslovits i pogovorok: antroponimicheskii kod kul’tury. Moscow: LENAND, 2022.
6. Mokienko V.M. Obraz vraga v russkoi frazeologii i paremiologii // Rusistika. 2022. T. 20. No. 2. S. 203–216. DOI 10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-2-203-216.
7. Nikitina T.G., Rogaleva E.I., Piao Lisian. Slovarnaia reprezentatsiia lingvokul’turnykh stereotipov: kommunikativnoe povedenie russkikh v tematicheskom slovare poslovits // Nauchnyi dialog. 2021. No. 10. S. 117–133. DOI 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-117-133.
8. Zakharova L.B., Zakharova E.V. Muzhskie agioantroponimy v ispanskikh paremiiakh // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2022. T. 15. No. 4. S. 1218–1224. DOI 10.30853/phil20220180.
9. Semina P.S. Tematicheskoe mnogoobrazie bel’giiskikh paremii (na leksikograficheskom materiale) // Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Teoriia iazyka. Semiotika. Semantika. 2019. T. 10. No. 4. S. 893–905. DOI 10.22363/2313-2299-2019-10-4-893-905.
10. Prosvirnina I.S., Shao Zhui. Kontsept “skromnost’” v russkikh i kitaiskikh paremiiakh // Filologiia i kul’tura. 2013. No. 4. S. 97–104.
11. Srebrianskaia N.A. Paremii narodov mira i ikh gendernaia spetsifika // Sovremennye lingvisticheskie i metodiko-didakticheskie issledovaniia. 2021. No. 4 (52). S. 78–87.
12. Van I. Paremicheskie zhanry russkogo i kitaiskogo fol’klora: osobennosti funktsionirovaniia lichnogo imeni sobstvennogo // Izvestiia Iuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Filologicheskie nauki. 2020. No. 3. S. 30–37.
13. Khu Ia. Oppozitsiia “spravedlivost’ — nespravedlivost’” v russkikh i kitaiskikh paremiiakh // Litera. 2022. No. 7. S. 120–131. DOI 10.25136/2409-8698.2022.7.36480.
14. Potapova N.A., Shchukina D.A. Russkie paremii i mekhanizmy chelovecheskogo myshleniia (vyrazhenie obobshchennogo znacheniia) // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Iazykoznanie. 2020. T. 19. No. 4. S. 109–119. DOI 10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.4.10.
15. Maltseva E.A. Doroga kak predmet kontseptual’noi refleksii // Idei i idealy. 2022. T. 14. No. 3-2. S. 385–402. DOI 10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.3.2-385-402.
16. Kaksin A.D. Kontsept “doroga” v mongol’skikh i tiurkskikh iazykakh (v sravnenii s finno-ugorskimi iazykami) // Aktual’nye problemy mongolovedeniia. 2016. No. 5. S. 71–77.
17. Liashenko N.A. Sredstva reprezentatsii kontsepta “doroga” v sovremennom angliiskom iazyke // Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki. 2020. No. 5. S. 162–173. DOI 10.18522/2070-1403-2020-82-5-162-173.
18. Chapogir S.I. Osobennosti verbalizatsii poniatiia “doroga” v evenkiiskom iazyke // Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2022. No. 4 (167). S. 250–253.
19. U Yan’tin. Razvitie upotrebleniia “temy dorogi” v russkoi literature // Uspekhi gumanitarnykh nauk. 2022. No. 8. S. 28–32.
20. Ostrovskaia K.Z. Metakontsept “put’-doroga” v narodnoi volshebnoi skazke kak vyrazhenie neprelozhnogo nravstvennogo zakona // Sovremennaia nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2022. No. 8. S. 133–136. DOI 10.37882/2223-2982.2022.08.19.
21. Shcherbina P., Chemodurova Z. Metafora dorogi v angloiazychnoi poezii XX i XXI vekov // Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. 2021. No. 62-2. S. 61–64. DOI 10.24412/3453-9875-2021-62-2-61-64.
22. Zhiganova E.P. Kontsept “doroga” v sovremennom russkoiazychnom poeticheskom diskurse Belarusi // Vestnik Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Pedagogika. Psikhologiia. Filologiia. 2020. No. 1 (103). S. 82–85.
23. Bodrova E.V., Churilina L.N. Frazeologizmy s komponentom “doroga” v rechevoi praktike kazakhsko-russkikh bilingvov // Gumanitarno-pedagogicheskie issledovaniia. 2020. T. 4. No. 2. S. 42–46.
24. Magdilova R.A., Gaiirbekova T.A. Ob”ektivatsiia kontsepta “doroga” v paremiologicheskoi kartine mira avartsev // Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniia. 2021. No. 6 (91). S. 554–556. DOI 10.24412/1991-5497-2021-691-554-556.
25. Teliya V.N. Russkaia frazeologiia: semanticheskii, pragmaticheskii i lingvokul’turologicheskii aspekty. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1996.
26. Zinovieva E.I., Matochkina A.E. Lingvokul’turograficheskii aspekt izucheniia russkikh paremii (na materiale poslovits s komponentom “voda”) // Russkii iazyk kak inostrannyi i metodika ego prepodavaniia. 2017. No. 28. S. 29–34.
27. Lao Tzu. Dao De Jing. Beijing: Kitaiskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 2021. Na kit. iaz.
28. Pu Tzu. Istoriia dzen-buddizma Dinastii Song. T. 1. Beijing: Kitaiskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1984. Na kit. iaz.
29. Confucius. Lunyu. Beijing: Pekinskaia ob”edinennaia izdatel’skaia kompaniia, 2015. Na kit. iaz.