.png)
UDC 811.161.1`3
Devyatova Nadezda M.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Russian Language and
General Linguistics Department
Institute of Humanities
Moscow City Pedagogical University
e-mail: deviatovan@mail.ru
The article discusses the discursive word simply and the system of its meanings. The objective is to identify the signs that ensure the unity of the word. The system of significant signs of adverbs and particles is identified. Opposition is thought of as an opposition of dictum and modus meaning. The adverb contains an assessment of some “technological process” and is addressed to the dictum of the described situation. The semantics of a particle is formed by a modus value. The set of modus meanings is represented as a “separate modus string”, or a modus script. When describing the semantics of a particle, the context of use is taken into account — the position before the identifying or characteristic vocabulary. The main modus meaning of the particle is to show the presented explanation of the situation as the simplest and most natural.
Keywords: adverb, particle, mode, “mode string”, subject and characteristic vocabulary.
References
1. Arutiunova N.D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. 383 s.
2. Balli Sh. Obshchaia lingvistika i voprosy frantsuzskogo iazyka. Moscow: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury, 1955. 416 s.
3. Baranov A.N., Plungian V.A., Rakhilina E.V. Putevoditel’ po diskursivnym slovam russkogo iazyka. Moscow: Pomovskii i partnery, 1993.
4. Borisova E.G. Diskursivnye markery v tekste kak priznak dialogichnosti // Antropologicheskii povorot: teorii i praktiki: sb. tr. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Orel, 2021. S. 18–25.
5. Vinogradov V.V. Russkii iazyk: (grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove) / pod red. G.A. Zolotovoi. 4-e izd. Moscow: Russkii iazyk, 2001. 720 s.
6. Deviatova N.M. Vvodno-modal’nye slova i ikh pragmaticheskie smysly. DOI 10.20339/PhS.1-21.014 // Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. 2021. No. 1. S. 14–20.
7. Deviatova N.M. Chastitsy i metodika raboty s nimi na prakticheskikh zaniatiiakh v shkole i v vuze // Vestnik MGPU. Seriia: Filologiia. Teoriia iazyka. Iazykovoe obrazovanie. 2015. No. 1 (17). S. 87–93.
8. Zolotova G.A., Onipenko N.K., Sidorova M.Yu. Kommunikativnaia grammatika russkogo iazyka. Moscow, 2004. 544 s.
9. Nikolaeva T.M. Funktsii chastits v vyskazyvanii (na materiale slavianskikh iazykov). Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2005. 168 s.
10. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar’ russkogo iazyka / pod red. N.Yu. Shvedovoi. 23-e izd., ispr. Moscow: Russkii iazyk, 1991. 917 s.
11. Onipenko N.K. V zashchitu modusa: (k voprosu o sovremennoi grammaticheskoi terminologii) // Ratsional’noe i emotsional’noe v russkom iazyke: sb. tr. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Moscow, 2016. S. 50–56.
12. Onipenko N.K. Ideia sub”ektnoi perspektivy v russkoi grammatike // Rusistika segodnia. 1994. No. 3. S. 74–83.
13. Rakhilina E.V. Kognitivnyi analiz predmetnykh imen: semantika i sochetaemost’. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 2000. 416 s.
14. Russkaia grammatika. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. T. 2. 710 s.