.png)
UDC 821.161.1(574)-3
Ovcherenko Ulyana,
Candidate of Phililogy,
Teacher of Additional Education of the Russian Language and
Intercultural Communication Department
Institute of the Russian Language
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
e-mail: ovcherenko1993@gmail.com
This article is devoted to the analysis of the concept “memory”, which is relevant for the postmodern understanding of the world and the problem of its reliability in D. Nakipov’s novel “Circle of Ashes”. Memory is an important concept for the writer, who is both a trans-linguistic writer and a postmodern writer. The analysis of researchers' opinions concerning the importance of the concept “memory” for the work of bilingual authors, as well as the essential understanding of memory as a phenomenon within the framework of the postmodern understanding of the concept has been carried out. The relationship between the presence and absence of historical knowledge, which is important for reflecting the author’s picture of the world, is revealed, and the question of the importance of immanent history, the creation of macrohistory from microhistory as the only tool that can preserve authenticity, is raised. A detailed analysis of the artistic use of the concept of memory and the reflection of its essence in the novel of a Kazakhstani writer has been made. It is concluded that D. Nakipov values factual historical knowledge, but places immanent history, which includes the emotional experience of the observer-participant, above factual history.
Keywords: Kazakh literature, memory, translingual literature, D. Nakipov, postmodernism.
References
1. Repinetskaya Yu.S. K voprosu o soderzhanii poniatii “istoricheskoe soznanie” i “istoricheskaia pamiat’” // Samarskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2017. T. 6. No. 1 (18). S. 147–151.
2. Sultanov K.K. Istoricheskaia pamiat’ i natsional’nyi narrativ: k voprosu o samoidentifikatsii // M.O. Auezov i dukhovnoe vozrozhdenie natsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. simpoziuma, posviashchennogo 120-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia M.O. Auezova. Almaty: Print express, 2018. S. 25–38.
3. Ovcherenko U. Sovremennaia proza Kazakhstana na russkom iazyke: osnovnye tendentsii razvitiia: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 2021.
4. Novokhatsky D. Transkul’turnyi tekst i tendentsii russkogo literaturnogo meinstrima: “Tashkentskii roman” Sukhbata Aflatuni // Mundo Eslavo. 2019. No. 18. S. 74–91.
5. Anan’eva S.V. Kontsept “pamiat’” i natsional’nyi obraz mira v tvorchestva Aleksandra Kana // Polilingvial’nost’ i transkul’turnye praktiki. 2020. T. 17. No. 3. S. 343–351.
6. Isina Nurikamal. Circle as a reflection: “Almaty” text as a way to express traditionalism (D. Nakipov’s Novel “The Circle of Ash”) // Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal’nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2016. No. 5. S. 1166–1173.
7. Zhaksylykov A., Zhapparova A. Gipertekst Diusenbeka Nakipova // Tamyr. 2015. No. 42. URL: http://tamyr.org/?p=2614 (20.09.2023).
8. Altybaeva S.M. Kazakhskaia proza perioda Nezavisimosti: traditsiia, novatorstvo, perspektivy: monografiia. Almaty: Ғylym, 2018. 440 s.
9. Nakipov D. Krug pepla: roman intentsii. Almaty, 2005. 226 s.
10. Khovanskayia A.V. Kontsept “istoricheskaia pamiat’” v epokhu postmoderna // Prioritetnye napravleniia razvitiia nauki v sovremennom mire: sb. st. po materialam I Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Ch. 2. Ufa, 2009. S. 166–171.