Preservation of minority languages and economic factors (using the example of Tatar and Karelian languages)

UDC 81`27

DOI 10.20339/PhS.6s-23.012       

Khilkhanova Erzhen V.,

Doctor of Philology, Leading Researcher

Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

ORCID: 0000-0001-9369-343X

ResearcherID B-3667-2017, SPIN 5600-6309

e-mail: erzhen.khilkhanova@iling-ran.ru

This article argues the importance of studying the economic factors that influence the preservation of minority languages and language choice. Economic and sociolinguistic methods of studying the relationship between minority language proficiency and labor income are considered. The empirical research is made within the framework of an approach close to the ethnography of language policy, i.e. through the prism of personal, subjective views and assessments of “ordinary” people. The empirical case is made up by two republics of the Russian Federation — Tatarstan and Karelia. The material was the data of sociolinguistic surveys, interviews and ethnographic observations collected in these regions in 2021 and 2022. The empirical analysis revealed both the absence of the influence of minority language competence on income, and the presence of spheres and economic niches where such an influence exists. Employment opportunities, earnings and part-time work are available in these republics in the field of science, culture, media, and creative industries. The research also revealed the role of economic factor in the hierarchy of people’s needs. The needs of (linguistic) identity, the desire to preserve “language and roots” take the second place until the basic needs that push people to choose the language of “bread and job” are satisfied. At the end, the article outlines the directions for further research on the relationship between the economic factor and minority languages.

Keywords: commodification of language, language economics, minority languages, income, ethnography of language policy, Tatarstan, Karelia.

References

1. Khilkhanova E.V. Ekonomika iazyka i mnogoiazychie: opyt issledovaniia v Tatarstane. DOI 10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-2-0-4 // Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Voprosy teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi lingvistiki. 2022. T. 8. No. 2. P. 52–65.
2. Filippova E.I. Sud’ba iazykov v globalizuiushchemsia mire // Iazyki men’shinstv: iuridicheskii status i povsednevnye praktiki. Moscow: FGNKh “Rosinformagrotekh”, 2013. S. 5–16.
3. Heller M. The commodification of language // Annual Review of Anthropology. 2010. No. 39. P. 101–114.
4. Pavlenko A. Russkii iazyk kak lingva franka v zarubezhnoi sfere obsluzhivaniia // Mir russkogo slova. 2016. No. 1. S. 23–32.
5. Viimaranta H., Protassova E., Mustajoki A. Aspects of commodification of Russian in Finland. DOI 10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-3-620-634 // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. No. 21 (3). P. 620–634.
6. Gazzola M. Il valore economico delle lingue: (The economic value of languages). 2015. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2691086 (02.12.2021).
7. Chiswick B., Miller P. The complementarity of language and other human capital: Immigrant earnings in Canada // Economics of Education Review. 2003. No. 22 (5). P. 469–480.
8. Grin F., Sfreddo C., Vaillancourt F. The economics of the multilingual workplace. Routledge, 2010. DOI 10.4324/9780203852675.
9. Gazzola M., Wickström B.-A. Introduction / eds. M. Gazzola, B.-A. Wickström // The Economics Of Language Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. P. 1–18.
10. Zhang W., Grenier G. How can language be linked to economics? A survey of two strands of research // Language Problems and Language Planning. 2012. No. 37. P. 203–226.
11. Grin F. Challenges of minority languages / eds. V. Ginsburgh, S. Weber // The Palgrave Handbook Of Economics And Language. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. P. 616–658.
12. Grin F. Using language economics and education economics in language education policy. Strasbourg, 2002.
13. McCarty T. Ethnography in language planning and policy research // Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide / eds. F. Hult, D. Johnson. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. P. 81–93.
14. Khilkhanova E., Khilkhanov D. Language and ethnic identity of minorities in post-soyiet Russia: The Buryat case study // Journal of Language, Identity, and Education. 2004. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 85–100.
15. Maslow A. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row, 1954.
16. Sallabank J. Attitudes to endangered languages: Identities and policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
17.  Zhornik D.O. Revitalizatsiia i sotsial’nye problemy iazykovykh soobshchestv (na primere mansiiskogo iazyka v Sverdlovskoi oblasti) // Mezhdunarodnaia konferentsiia “Lingvisticheskii forum — 2021. Iazykovaia politika i sokhranenie iazykov”, 11–13 noiabria 2021 g., Moskva: tezisy dokladov / pod red. A.A. Kibrika, V.Yu. Guseva, A.B. Shluinskogo. Moscow: Institut iazykoznaniia RAN, 2021. S. 50–51.

The work has been supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the German Research Community (project no. 21-512-1202).