Ontological Prerequisites for the Study of Creolized Text’s Semantic Perception

UDC 81`42

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-20.252

Kosenko Viktoria S.,

Senior Lecturer of the Stage Speech Department

Russian Institute of Theatre Arts — GITIS

e-mail: visha_k@mail.ru

Sinyachkin Vladimir P.,

Doctor of Philology, Professor,

Head of the Russian Language and

Intercultural Communication Department

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

e-mail: word@list.ru

With this paper we try to comprehend the phenomenon of creolized text as a semiotic complex existing in the unity of verbal and non-verbal components. Creolized texts, combining the verbal part with visual fragments, make up most of the texts that function in the media and virtual data. Therefore, scientific information that reveals the influence of the verbal and non-verbal parts of a creolized text on its semantic perception has pragmatic value. The term “creolized text” is analyzed in our work from the point of view of its inclusion in the paradigm of semantically close definitions: “linguo-visual complex”, “polycode text”, “complex semiotic whole”. The main stages of the study of creolized text in world and Russian science are presented in a diachronic sequence. The basic parameters of perception of the creolized text are considered. The research is intended to acquaint the reader with the main milestones in the history of the study of this phenomenon and to provide its detailed terminological definition.

Keywords: semiotics, linguistics, text, creolized text, perception, semantic context, communication.

References

1. Bernatskaia A.A. K probleme “kreolizatsii” teksta: istoriia i sovremennoe sostoianie // Rechevoe obshchenie: Spetsializirovannyi vestnik / pod red. A.P. Skovorodnikova. Vyp. 3 (11). Krasnoiarsk, 2000. S. 23–31.

2. Anisimova E.E. Lingvistika teksta i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia (na materiale kreolizovannykh tekstov). Moscow: Academia, 2003. 128 s.

3. Berezin V.M. Massovaia kommunikatsiia: sushchnost’, kanaly, deistviia. Moscow: Izd-vo RIP-kholding, 2003. 174 s.

4. Bol’shiianova L.S. Verbal’noe soprovozhdenie fotoizobrazheniia v sovremennoi britanskoi presse: Soderzhanie i struktura: аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Leningrad, 1986. 29 s.

5. Zenkova A.Iu. Vizual’naia metafora v sotsial’no-politicheskom diskurse: metodologicheskii aspect // Mnogoobrazie politicheskogo diskursa. Ekaterinburg, 2004. S. 39–54.

6. Sorokin Iu.A., Tarasov E.F. Kreolizovannye teksty i ikh kommunikativnaia funktsiia // Optimizatsiia rechevogo vozdeistviia. Moscow, 1990. S. 180–181.

7. Romanovskaia O.E. Kreolizovannyi tekst i ego vospriiatie retsipientom, prinadlezhashchim k drugoi lingvokul’turnoi obshchnosti // Uchenye zapiski Ul’ianovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Aktual’nye problemy lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki. Seriia: Lingvistika. Vyp.  2 (5). Ulyanovsk, 2000. S. 53–57.

8. Kamenskaia O.L. Lingvistika na poroge XXI veka // Lingvisticheskie marginalia: sb. nauch. trudov MGLU. Vyp. 432. Moscow, 1996. S. 13–21.

9. Iakobson R.O. Izbrannye raboty. Moscow: Progress, 1985. 460 s.

10. Gerchuk Iu.Ia. Khudozhestvennye miry knigi. Moscow: Kniga, 1989. 239 s.

11. Barthes R. Osnovy semiologii // Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv”. Moscow: Progress, 1975. S. 114–163.

12. Kolevatov V.A. Sotsial’naia pamiat’ i poznanie. Moscow: Mysl’, 1984. 190 s.

13. Eiger G.V., Iukht V.L. K postroeniiu tipologii tekstov // Lingvistika teksta: materialy nauchnoi konferentsii pri MGPIIIa im. M. Toreza. Ch. 1. Moscow, 1974. S. 103–109.

14. Protchenko A.V. Tipologicheskie i funktsional’no-stilisticheskie kharakteristiki angloiazychnogo putevoditelia: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Samara, 2006.

15. Poimanova O.V. Semanticheskoe prostranstvo videoverbal’nogo teksta: аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1997. 26 s.

16. Novikov A.M., Novikov D.A. Metodologiia nauchnogo issledovaniia. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom “LIBROKOM”, 2010. 280 s.

17. Dridze T.M., Leont’ev A.A. Smyslovoe vospriiatie rechevogo soobshcheniia v usloviiakh massovoi kommunikatsii. Leningrad: Nauka, 1976. 262 s.

18. Morozov V.P. Neverbal’naia kommunikatsiia: Eksperimental’no-psikhologicheskie issledovaniia. Moscow: Izd-vo IP RAN, 2011. 528 s.

19. Galton F. Optical continuity. Nature. 1893. No. 47. P. 342–345.

20. Richardson J.T.E. Myslennye obrazy: Kognitivnyi podkhod. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr, 2006. 175 s.

21. Paivio A. Comparisons of mental clocks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1978. No. 4(1). P. 61–71.

22. Mitchell W. Ikonologiia. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologiia. Moscow: Kabinetnyi uchenyi, 2017. 240 s.

23. Knorozov Iu.V. Pis’mennost’ indeitsev Maiia. Moscow – Leningrad: AN SSSR, 1963. 664 s.

24. Golovina L.V. Vliianie ikonicheskikh i verbal’nykh znakov pri smyslovom vospriiatii teksta: аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow, 1986. 21 s.

25. Sonin A.G., Michurin D.S. Tekst i kontekst: issledovanie semantiki iazykovykh edinits v usloviiakh polikodovoi kommunikatsii // Russkii iazyk v shkole. 2013. No. 9. S. 57–62.