Promoting of New Scientific Knowledge in Research Paper in Linguistics

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.5-17.099

Cherniavskaia Valeria E.,

Prof., Dr. Sci. (Philology),

Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Politechnic University

e-mail: tcherniavskaia@rambler.ru

The article focuses specific linguistic choices that facilitate the process of disseminating research outcomes and findings in the form of texts both among scholars and experts in the field. Research paper in peer-reviewed specialist periodicals in linguistics is considered to be a source of information transfer, information mining and extraction. A linguo-epistemic approach was used to analize the research papers published 2013—2015 in Russian peer-reviewed specialist periodicals in linguistics. We argue the issue of how new ‘chunks’ of text semantics are realized through a system of linguistic choices of a given text so as to hold a prominent position in it.

Keywords: structure of the scientific knowledge, scientific text, knowledge dissemination, linguo-epistemic strategy.

References

1. Cherniavskaia, V.E. Scientific Discourse: Visibility as communicative and linguistic challenge. Moscow, 2017.

2. Mirsky, E.M. Science as a Social Instition. In: Philosophy of Science. Moscow, 2007, pp. 307–331.

3. Cherniavskaia, V.E. Research Paper as Verbalisation of New Scientific Knowledge. Speech Genres, 2016, no. 1 (13), pp. 56–64.

4. Belyaeva, L.N., Shubina, N.L. Research paper as an object of evaluation. Issues of Herzen State University, 2014, no. 172, pp. 5–12.

5. Lebedev, S.A. The Problem of Truth in natural and social sciences. In: Philosophy of natural and social sciences. Moscow, 2008, pp. 11–68.

6. Ilyin, V.V. The Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities. Op. cit. P. 69–151.

7. Kotyurova, M.P. Extralinguistic Factors of the Semantic Structure of a Scientific Text. Functional-stilistic aspect. Krasnoyarsk, 1988.

8. Kotyurova, M.P. Actualisation of Scientific Knowledge’ Continuity. Stylistic of Scientific Text, 1996. Vol. 2. Part 1. P. 143–157. Perm.

9. Bazenova, E.A. Scientific Text in the Aspect of Politextuality. Perm, 2001.

10. Danilevskaya, N.V. Interchange of Old and New Knowledge in  Scientific Text Production (axiologic aspect). Ekaterinburg, 2006.

11. Cherniavskaia a, V.E. Communication in the Science: Norm and Deviation. Linguistic and Sociocultural Aspects. Moscow, 2011.

12. Novikov, A.S. Scientific Discoveries. Мoscow, 2003.

13. Danilevskaya, N.V. Evaluation in the Scientific Text Production. Perm, 2005.

Foreign sources

14. Knorr Cetina, K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

15. Cherniavskaia, V. Cultural Diversity in Knowledge Dissemination: Linguo-Cultural Approach. SGEM International multidisciplinary scientific conference on social sciences and arts, 2016, no. 3 – 1, pp. 443–450.

16. Akopova, M., Chernyavskaya, V. Evaluation of Academic Science: Perspectives and Challenges. Analyzing the Experience of St. Petersburg State Politechnical University. Zeitschrift für Evaluation, 2014, no. 2, pp. 348–357.

17. Power, M. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press, 1997.

18. Reinhart, M. Peer Review Practices: Epistemic and Social Aspects in the Assessment of Scientific Work. Research Evaluation, 2010, 19 (5), pp. 317–331.

19. Simon, D. Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft durch Evaluationen? Optionen und Grenzen institutioneller Forschungsbewertungen // Fischer Klaus, Parthey  Heinrich (Hrsg.). Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Institutionen. Wissenschaftsforschung Jahrbuch 2003. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung, 2004, S. 9–21.

20. Cherniavskaia, V. Interkulturelle Differenzen von wissenschaftlichen Texten. K.-D. Baumann (Ed.). Fach – Translat – Kultur. Interdisziplinare Aspekte der vernetzten Vielfalt (Band 2). Berlin: Frank & Timme, 2011. S. 1241–1270.