About development the Russian interoceptive linguistics

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-17.051

Kharchenko Vera K.,

Doctor Sci. in Philology, Professor,

Head of the Department of the Philology

Belgorod State National Research University

e-mail  wera_kharchenko@mail.ru

The article deals with a problem of interception. The importance and perspectives of the research of language of intra-corporal sensations as a relatively new direction of the contemporary Russian linguistics are discovered on the basis of Russian-language material. Some methodological approaches to the collection of the material are specified. The necessity to take into consideration the whole diversity of discursive practices is postulated.

Keywords: interception, body, metaphor, narrative, pain, illness, Russian-language colloquial, fictional, popular scientific, hospital, childish discourses.

References

1. Nagornaya, A.V. Discurs of nevurazimogo: verbalica vnutritelesnuh oshchushcheniy. Moscow: LENAND, 2014, 316 p.

2. Nagornaya, A.V. Verbalnaya reprezentatsiya interoceptivnuh oshchushcheniy v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke. Author’s abstr. diss. (Dr.sci. in Philol.). Moscow, 2015.

3. Kharchenko, V.K. Interacorporal language i russian language discourses practics. Nauchnuye vedomosti. Humanitarnue nauki, 2015, no. 12 (209), iss. 26, June, pp. 68–75.

4. Kharchenko, V.K. Interoception v bolnichnom discourse. Nauchnue vedomosti. Humanitarnue nauki, 2016, no. 7 (228), iss. 29, pp. 44–50.

5. Kharchenko, V.K. Interoception v detskoi rechi. In: Materialu mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy conferentsii “Problemu ontolingvistic – 2016”. St. Petersburg, 23–26 march, 2016. Ivanov: LISTOS, 2016, pp. 89–96.

6. Kharchenko, V.K. Retsenziya: Nagornaya A.V. Discurs of nevirazimogo: verbalica vnutritelesnih oshchushcheniy. Filologos, 2015. Iss. 3, pp. 100–103.

7. Rarenko, M.B. Konceptualizatsiya boli v yazuke na primere angliyskoi lingvoculturu. In: Chelovek oshchushchayushchiy: Perceptsia v sovremennom humanitarnom znanii. Moscow: INION RAN, 2015, pp. 112–115.

8. Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A.A., Rakhilina, E.V., Reznikova, T.I. Konceptualizatsiya boli v russian yazyke: tipologicheskaya perspectiva. In: Trudu mezhdunarodnoy conferentsii “Dialog – 2007”. Moscow, 2007, pp. 76–82.

9. Khlupina, M.A. Osobennosti yazykovoi lichnosti S.D. Dovlatova: Author’s abstr. diss. (Cand.sci. in Philol.). Moscow, 2014.

10. Nesterova, O.A. Psycholinguisticheskiy i lingvocognitivnui analiz yazykovoi  lichnosti (on material of publicities discourse V.P. Astaphiev). Author’s abstr. diss. (Cand.sci. in Philol.). Nizhniy Novgorod, 2015, 24 p.

11. Romanova, M.S. A. Tarkovskiy kak yazykovaya lichnost': methodu representation in poeticheskom texte: Author’s abstr. diss. (Cand.sci. in Philol.). Pyatigorsk, 2015.

12.  Tarasova, S. “U men'a opyat' 37 i 5”. Znanie – sila, 1997, no. 12, pp. 88–89.

13. Popova, O.V. “But' telom” ili “imet' telo”, “but' projectom” ili “imet' project”. Electronnuy zurnal «NB»: Culturu i iskustva», 2014, no. 1. URL: www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10961.html

14. Knyazeva, E., Turobov, A. Poznayuschcee telo: novuye podhodu v epistemologii. Novuy mir, 2002, no. 11, pp. 136–154.

15. Pogrebnyak, Yu.V. Kharacteristici interiorizirovannogo discursa. Volgograd: Peremena, 2013, 262 p.

16. Denisova, A.S. Phrazeologizmu, oboznachayushchie chuvstvo goloda vo frantsuzskom yazyke: structurnyi aspect. In: Chelovek oshchushchayushchiy: Perceptsia v sovremennom humanitarnom znanii. Moscow: INION RAN, 2015, pp. 30–33.

17. Epschtein, M.N. Projectiv teoria v estestvennuh i humanitarnuh naukah. Znanie – sila, 2012, no. 4, pp. 55–62.