.png)
UDC 81`28
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-22.042
Nedostupova Lubov V.,
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the
Russian Language and Intercultural Communication Department
Voronezh State Technical University
e-mail: nedostupowa2009@yandex.ru
In this research, a folk name-book is presented. The purpose of the study is to describe anthroponymic units that name rural families in the yard, which go back to female nicknames, given by appearance, speech and voice features, attitude to work, character traits and temperament, special skills, material condition, communication with a pet, name, culinary preferences, resemblance to famous people; establishing their semantic meaning; determining ways of education; clarification of the nominative and evaluative function, variable nicknames, demonstrating originality in the South Russian dialect of the small village of Vysoky, Voronezh region. The subject of the study is the yard naming of rural families in their diversity. Vysokovsky dialect and its features become the object. The language material is the folk speech of the old-timers and centenarians of the settlement, recorded by the author of the work during conversations in the field. During the study, methods were used: stationary observation, survey and interviewing, description, analysis and comparison. The results of the work are expressed in 46 onomastic units classified by value into 10 groups. Small and large groups, the method of formation and productive formants are indicated. It is proved that associations and emotional coloring are transferred to family and yard nicknames from those names to which they go back. It is concluded that the tradition of village communication through household names has been preserved to this day. Naming is based on a creative approach. This material is introduced into scientific circulation for the first time.
Keywords: folk speech, South Russian dialect, household names, onomastic units, anthroponymicon, nicknames.
References
1. Vendina T.I. Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov i iazykovaia kartina mira russkogo naroda // Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov — 1998. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 1998. S. 11–18.
2. Vendina T.I. Russkie dialekty v nastoiashchem i budushchem: sotsiokul’turnyi aspekt // Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov — 2010. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 2010. S. 6–38.
3. Vendina T.I. Russkaia traditsionnaia dukhovnaia kul’tura: nasledie v slove // Metafizika. 2012. No. 6. S. 49–64.
4. Vendina T.I. Dialektnoe slovo: vchera, segodnia, zavtra // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. T. 23. S. 44–49.
5. Kasatkin L.L., Isaev I.I. Dialektologicheskie ekspeditsii Instituta russkogo iazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova RAN // Vestnik Rossiiskogo gumanitarnogo nauhnogo fonda. 2005. No. 3 (40). S. 215–225.
6. Myznikov S.A. Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov // Vestnik Rossiiskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda. 2013. No. 3 (72). S. 134–145.
7. Isaev I.I. Chelovek, vladeiushchii dialektom, vosprinimaetsia kak neobrazovannyi: intervju s lingvistom Igorem Isaevym o dialektakh i jazykovoi politike // PostNauka. URL: https://postnauka.ru/talks/24085 (10.01.2022). Data publikatsii: 11.04.2014.
8. Isaev I.I. K sozdaniiu bazy dannykh russkikh dialektov i perspektivy dialektometricheskikh issledovanii // Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2016. No. 11. S. 972–977.
9. Lesnikov S.V. Analiticheskii obzor istochnikov russkikh terminov onomastiki i ikh sistematizatsiia i komp’iuternoe ranzhirovanie // Onomastika Povolzh’ia. Velikii Novgorod: Novgorodskii pechatnyi dvor, 2019. S. 82–90.
10. Lesnikov S.V., Myznikov S.A. Ekstserptorno-eksplitsitnye definitsii kliuchevykh poniatii metaiazyka dialektologii // Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov — 2020. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 2020. S. 472–479.
11. Institut lingvisticheskikh issledovanii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. URL: https://iling.St. Petersburgru/index.html.ru (10.01.2022).
12. Suprun V.I. Vokativnoe upotreblenie antroponimov // Iazykovaia lichnost’: problemy kognitsii i kommunikatsii: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd, 2001. S. 343–348.
13. Suprun V.I. Onomasticheskie issledovaniia v Volgograde // Rossiia lingvisticheskaia: nauchnye napravleniia i shkoly Volgograda: kol. monogr. Volgograd: Volgogradskoe nauchnoe izdatel’stvo, 2012. 389 s.
14. Eremina E.S. Otrazhenie dialektnykh chert v sovremennykh russkikh familiiakh (na materiale familii zhitelei g. Volgograda): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Volgograd, 2005. 20 s.
15. Shostka E.S. Prozvishcha Tambovskoi oblasti: iazykovoi i sotsiokul’turnyi aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tambov, 2009. 22 s.
16. Mezhueva O.V. Sravnitel’naia kharakteristika dvorovykh familii i klichek (na materiale Tambovskoi oblasti) // Onomastika i obshchestvo: iazyk i kul’tura. Tambov: Izdatel’skii dom TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina, 2010. S. 104–107.
17. Koroleva E.E. Russkie prozvishcha Latgalii // Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov — 2013. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 2013. S. 299–312.
18. Rogalev A.F. Imia i lichnost’ // Materialy po russko-slavianskomu iazykoznaniiu. Vyp. 32. Voronezh: Istoki, 2014. S. 340–352.
19. Bunchuk T.N., Propisnova E.L. Antroponimicheskaia sistema sela Loima // Nauchnyi dialog. 2015. No. 9 (45). S. 8–30.
20. Kyurshunova I.A. Istoricheskaia antroponimiia Karelii v novykh paradigmakh lingvisticheskogo znaniia: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Petrozavodsk, 2017.
21. Vorontsova Iu.B., Makarova A.A. Zoomorfnaia model’ v kollektivnykh prozvishchakh Arkhangel’skoi oblasti // Etnolingvistika. Onomastika. Etimologiia. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2019. S. 77–80.
22. Rut M.E. Ob onomastike i dialektnoi leksikografii (iz opyta raboty nad dopolneniiami k “Slovariu govorov Russkogo Severa” // Etnolingvistika. Onomastika. Etimologiia. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2019. S. 292–293.
23. Chernykh A.V. Nazvaniia staroobriadtsev v dialektnoi rechi russkogo naseleniia Permskogo kraia // Etnolingvistika. Onomastika. Etimologiia. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2019. S. 353–355.
24. Shevchenko N.V. Tematicheskaia klassifikatsiia i osobennosti obrazovaniia prozvishch v lipetskikh govorakh // Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov — 2020. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 2020. S. 848–864.
25. Kozlova K.A. Antroponimy v narodnom kalendare (na materiale sovremennykh govorov Saratovskoi oblasti) // Sovremennaia russkaia leksikologiia, leksikografiia i lingvogeografiia. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 2021. S. 90–98.
26. Gridneva L.M. Vysokii. Vremia, sobytiia, liudi. 1922–2007. Talovaia: Talovskaia raionnaia redaktsiia, 2007. 44 s.
27. Korolkova M.D. Sostoianie obsledovaniia regionov po temam LARNG: itogi tridtsatiletnei raboty // Leksicheskii atlas russkikh narodnykh govorov — 2021. St. Petersburg: ILI RAN, 2021. S. 233–356. URL: https://iling.St. Petersburgru/periodicals/larng/2021/book.pdf (10.01.2022).
28. Nedostupova L.V. Otrazhenie kartiny mira russkoi derevni v se-meiskikh neofitsial’nykh imenakh // Rusistika bez granici. 2021. Vol. V. Iss. 4. S. 7–16.
29. Nedostupova L.V. Vysokovskie zhenskie neofitsial’nye imena i ikh otrazhenie v dialektnoi kartine mira // Sovremennye lingvisticheskie i metodiko-didakticheskie issledovaniia. 2021. Vyp. 3 (51). S. 87–99.