Digital archive of Dostoevsky: problems of publication of a handwritten text in the electronic edition

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-19.081 

Tarasova Natalia A.,

Doctor of Philology, Leading Researcher

Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkinskii Dom) of the Russian Academy of Sciences

e-mail: nsova74@mail.ru

The article is devoted to the actual problem of electronic publication of a literary text. The material of the research is the notebooks of F.M. Dostoevsky, which contain artistic and publicistic ideas of the author. This is the constant object of research attention. The paper deals with the issues related to the creation of the digital archive of the writer: the conception of electronic publication; the principles of using information technology in the preparation of Dostoevsky’s notebooks for publication; the problem of transcription of handwritten text; the principles of language analysis and editing of the material. The conception of a digital archive is based on the idea of multifunctionality that would allow readers to get acquainted with high-quality digital copies of Dostoevsky’s manuscripts, scientific interpretations of these manuscripts, commentaries to the text and other publications. The use of information technology in the organization of digital archives allows us to provide readers with maximum information about Dostoevsky’s texts and make the site more convenient and functional. The textual transcription of manuscripts varies in methods of the scientific description and presentation of the text. The article analyzes a special system of transcription signs, which shows the dynamics of Dostoevsky's creative process. It is planned to present Dostoevsky's texts in the digital archive in two versions — authentic, in the writer's language, and modern, taking into account the current language rules, as well as the peculiarities of the style and language in the handwritten text.

Keywords: Dostoevsky, textual criticism, handwritten text, Digital Humanities.

References

1. Tomashevskii B.V. Pisatel’ i kniga. Ocherk tekstologii. 2-e izd. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1959.

2. Bel’chikov N.F. Turgenev i Dostoevskii: (Kritika “Dyma”) // Literatura i marksizm: Zhurnal teorii i istorii literatury. 1928. Kn. 1. S. 63–94.

3. Rozenblium L.M. Tvorcheskie dnevniki Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

4. Iz arkhiva F.M. Dostoevskogo. Prestuplenie i nakazanie. Neizdannye materialy / Tsentrarkhiv; podg. k pechati I.I. Glivenko. Moscow; Leningrad: GIKhL, 1931.

5. Zapisnye tetradi F.M. Dostoevskogo / Podg. k pechati E.N. Konshinoi; komm. N.I. Ignatovoi i E.N. Konshinoi. Moscow; Leningrad: Academia, 1935.

6. Iz arkhiva F.M. Dostoevskogo. Idiot. Neizdannye materialy / Tsentrarkhiv; pod red. P.N. Sakulina i N.F. Bel’chikova. Moscow; Leningrad: GIKhL, 1931.

7. F.M. Dostoevsky v rabote nad romanom “Podrostok”. Tvorcheskie rukopisi / AN SSSR; Institut mirovoi literatury im. A.M. Gor’kogo; podgot. teksta A.S. Dolinina; red. I.S. Zil’bershtein, L.M. Rozenblium. Moscow: Nauka, 1965 (Seriia: Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 77).

8. Neizdannyi Dostoevsky. Zapisnye knizhki i tetradi 1860–1881 gg. / AN SSSR; Institut mirovoi literatury im. A.M. Gor’kogo; red. I.S. Zil’bershtein, L.M. Rozenblium. Moscow: Nauka, 1971 (Seriia: Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 83).

9. F.M. Dostoevsky. Prestuplenie i nakazanie / AN SSSR; izd. podgot. L.D. Opul’skaia i G.F. Kogan. Moscow: Nauka, 1970 (Seriia: Literaturnye pamiatniki).

10. Dostoevskii F.M. Poln. sobr. soch.: v 30 t. Leningrad: Nauka, 1972–1990.

11. Komarovich V.L. Literaturnoe nasledstvo Dostoevskogo za gody revoliutsii: Obzor publikatsii 1917–1933 gg. Moscow: Zhurnal’no-gazetnoe ob’’edinenie, 1934. S. 258–281 (Seriia. Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 15).

12. Rozenblium L.M. Problemy publikatsii zapisnykh knizhek pisatelia (iz opyta “Literaturnogo nasledstva”) // Sovremennaia tekstologiia: teoriia i praktika. Moscow: Nasledie, 1997. S. 89–94.

13. Aktual’nye problemy istochnikovedeniia i tekstologii v kontekste sovremennykh informatsionnykh tekhnologii: materialy Vseross. nauch. konf. / Red.-sost. T.T. Burlakova; red. L.V. Kaliuzhnaia. Moscow: Gos. muzei L.N. Tolstogo, 2011.

14. Khomiakova E.V. Tekhnologiia mul’timediinogo predstavleniia tvorcheskoi istorii teksta v elektronnom izdanii (izdate’skii proekt “Videotekst”): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. St. Petersburg, 2017.

15. Tarasova N.A. “Dnevnik pisatelia” F.M. Dostoevskogo za 1876–1877 gody: Kritika teksta. Moscow: Kvadriga, 2011.

16. F.M. Dostoevskii: Materialy i issledovaniia / AN SSSR; Institut russkoi literatury; pod red. A.S. Dolinina. Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1935.

17. F.M. Dostojewski. Die Urgestalt der Brüder Karamasoff. Dostojewskis Quellen, Entwürfe und Fragmente, erläutert von W. Komarowitsch. München: R. Piper, 1928.

18. Tarasova N.A. Problemy tekstologii F.M. Dostoevskogo: roman “Podrostok” i “Dnevnik pisatelia” za 1876–1877 gg.: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow, 2011.

19. Pertsov N.V. Ob autentichnom faksimil’no-transkriptsionnom predstavlenii rukopisei russkikh klassikov // Filologicheskie nauki. NDVSh. 2015. No. 1. S. 75–94.