http://dx.doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-15.102
Hakobyan Anush V.,
PhD in Philology, Docent , Associate Professor
Department of Russian Language for Humanitarian Faculties,
Faculty of Russian Philology,
Yerevan State University, Armenia
The article investigates the textems that formed makrotekstems, which are, in turn, part of the text. We introduce the notion of intersection of textems and shows some ways their full allocation. Structural hierarchical relationship considered text units is presented in the form of a hypergraph of textem and directed graphs of makrotekstem and text.
Keywords: structure, textem, makrotekstem, intersection, graph, hypergraph.
References
- Tesnière L. Elements of structural syntax. — M.: Progress, 1988.
- Djahukyan G.B. A universal linguistic theory. Prolegomena to substantionel linguistics. — M.: Institute of Linguistics, RAS, 1999.
- Valgina N.S. The theory of text. — M.: Logos, 2003.
- Apresyan Y.D. Ideas and methods of structural linguistics. — M.: Education, 1966.
- Galperin I.R. Text as an object of linguistic research. Ed. 5th, stereotypical. — M.: KomKniga, 2007.
- Blokh M.J. Dyktema in the level structure of language // Problems of Linguistics. — 2000. — No. 4. — P. 56–67.
- Hakobyan A.V. On the allocation and the relationship of certain textem // Russian in Armenia. — 2014. — No. 6. — P. 28–36.
- Berge C. Graphs and Hypergraphs. — New York: Elsevier, 1973.
- Hakobyan A.V. IF and only IF. — Yerevan: YSU, 2012.
- Chernyakhovskaya L.A. Semantic structure of the text and its units // Problems of Linguistics. — 1983. —No. 6. — P. 117–126.