.png)
UDC 821.161.1(575.2)-1
DOI 10.20339/PhS.6s-25.162
Arzamazov Aleksey A.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Russian Studies, Ethno-Oriented
Pedagogy and Digital Didactics Department
Institute of the Russian Language
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia;
Head of the Laboratory of Multifactor Humanitarian Analysis and
Cognitive Philology
Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Science
e-mail: arzami@rambler.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-5917
Khudaiberdina Dinara A.,
Doctoral Student of the Russian Philology and
World Literature Department
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan)
e-mail: dinara.azretalievna@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6352-110Х
The paper examines the poetic work of Svetlana Suslova, who is one of the most prominent representatives of Russian-language literature in modern Kyrgyzstan. The structural, compositional and substantive aspects of her poetry are explored. It was revealed that one of the key categories of the artistic world of S.G. Suslova is the category of memory. The past has a special axiological status in the interpreted author’s concept: it is a time of joyful memories, harmony with oneself and the surrounding world. The past is contrasted with the tragic reality of the present. It was established that one of the main motives of the poetic discourse of memory is sleep. The paper also examined examples of landscape lyrics by S.G. Suslova. The author’s focus on the traditions of Russian literature is emphasized. The multidimensional figurative-associative language of perception in Suslova’s works is demonstrated and analyzed. It is concluded that her poetic system should be considered in a comparative aspect and can become an object of theoretical modeling.
Keywords: Russian-language poetry, ethnoculture, figurative system, category of memory, landscape lyrics, visuality, native language
References
1. Bakhtikireeva U.M. Tvorcheskaia bilingval’naia lichnost’: natsional’nyi russkoiazychnyi pisatel’ i osobennosti ego russkogo khudozhestvennogo teksta. Moscow: Triada, 2005. 192 s.
2. Bakhtikireeva U.M. Russkoiazychnyi tekst: o nerusskoi iazykovoi lichnosti // Funktsional’naia semantika i semiotika: sb. nauch. st.: v 2 ch. Moscow: RUDN, 2014. Ch. 1. 596 s.
3. Bakhtikireeva U.M., Shagimgereeva B.E. Iazykovoe bytie tvorcheskoi lichnosti: Bakhyt Kairbekov // Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal’nem Vostoke. 2020. T. 17. No. 1. S. 83–89.
4. Valikova O.A., Siniachkin V.P., Kulieva Sh.A. Onticheskie elementy kak markery translingval’nosti v stikhotvoreniiakh E. Mizhita // Novye issledovaniia Tuvy. 2023. No. 4. S. 171–184.
5. Sultanov K.K. Ugol prelomleniia. Literatura i identichnost’: kommunikativnyi aspekt. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2019. 352 s.
6. Sultanov K.K. Evoliutsiia i traditsiia: ot «mladopis’mennoi» literatury k narrativnoi identichnosti. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2025. 544 s.
7. Zlydneva N.V. Vizual’nyi narrativ: opyt mifopoeticheskogo prochteniia. Moscow: Indrik, 2013. 360 s.
8. Fe1ski R. Beyond feminist aesthetics. Feminist literature and social change. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1989. 240 p.
9. Gachev G.D. Natsional’nye obrazy mira: obshchie voprosy: russkii, bolgarskii, kirgizskii, gruzinskii, armianskii. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’, 1988. 233 s.
10. Gachev G.D. Neminuemoe. Uskorennoe razvitie literatury. Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1989. 431 s.
11. Suslova S.G. Solnechnyi veter. Bishkek: Literaturnyi Kyrgyzstan, 2024. 247 s.
12. Suslova S.G. Tantsuiushchii iris. Bishkek: Literaturnyi Kyrgyzstan, 2021. 300 s.