.png)
Ivanov Dmitry I.,
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor,
Professor of the Institute of Foreign Languages
Xi’an Shiyou University (China)
e-mail: ivan610@yandex.ru
Varava Vladimir V.,
Doctor Philosophy,
Professor of the Philosophical Anthropology Department
Lomonosov Moscow State University
e-mail: vladimir_varava@list.ru
The present article proposes a theoretical understanding of one of the facets of the subjectivity problem in the perspective of the original author’s concept of cognitive-pragmatic programs (CPP). The starting point is the well-reasoned position that a multilevel complex study of the subject within the framework of the theory of CPP allows modeling both its basic “meta-subjective” form and any specific conceptual variants of subjectness. The general abstract model of the “program subject” takes the following for: Program subject (S-p) = S-p1 (“Me within the “other’s” CPPs system”) + (Sp-trans1-2) + S-p2 (“Me within the “own” CPPs system”). The direct object of the study is the cognitive modeling of the role subject S-r1 system. The metanarrative role zone “I am in the system of “other’s” roles” consists of two levels: “who can I (S-p1) become in the system of “other’s” roles”; “whom I (S-p1) became in the system of “other’s” roles”. It is a dynamic but stable system that conceptually allows the program subject to “merge with the role” maintaining its internal independence. The program subject (S-p1) just “tries” standard masks on within the framework of the primary role identification but does not identify himself with them. All components of this strategy are updated autonomously, which reduces the productivity of intentional search. However, this also allows the subject to adapt to the “roles” for the transition to the second level of modeling S-r1. In the process of secondary role identification the program subject (S-p1) narrows the zone of its intentional search and radically changes the principle of mastering the role space. If before S-p1 just “tried” the roles on, now he seeks to “assume” an “other’s” role. The cognitive-mental distance between S-p1 and S-r1 is erased: the role ceases to be a mask and becomes part of the programmatically determined “essential self”, for which all components of the strategy are activated in a complex manner. In the final synthetic form of the subject S-p(r)1, the “role self” and the “essential self” are inseparable from each other, but at the same time they are not completely identified.
Keywords: program subject, role subject, cognitive-pragmatic program (CPP), metanarrative, status-role positioning strategy, self-identification, cognitive modeling
References
1. Biryukov S. Transformatsii sub"ektnosti // Sub"ekt v noveishei russkoiazychnoi poezii: teoriia i praktika / pod. red. Kh. Shtal’, E. Evgrashkinoi. Vyp. 4. Berlin: Peter Lang GmbH Europaeischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2018. S. 79–101.
2. Radchenko E.V., Rang K.A. Ponimanie sub"ektnosti v filosofii i iazykoznanii // Vestnik IuUrGU. Ser.: Lingvistika. 2012. No. 2 (261). S. 74–78.
3. Broitman S.N. Istoricheskaia poetika. Moscow: RGGU, 2001. 320 s.
4. Korman B.O. Lirika Nekrasova. Izhevsk, 1978. 390 s.
5. Ginzburg L.Ya. O lirike. Ltningrad: Sovetskii pisatel’, 1974. 320 s.
6. Maslova V.A. Sovremennaia lingvistika — nauka o cheloveke, ego soznanii, iazyke i kul’ture // Gumanitarnyi vektor. 2018. No. 1. S. 6–11.
7. Sakhnevich M.S. K voprosu o formakh avtorskogo soznaniia v lirike // Voprosy russkoi literatury. 2014. No. 30 (87). S. 124–130.
8. Lozinskaya E.V. Kognitivnoe literaturovedenie: avtory, metody, perspektivy // Chelovek: obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty. 2010. No. 1. S. 192–225.
9. Ivanov D.I., Lakerbai D.L. Kognitivnaia gumanitarnaia semiotika: v 2 kn. Kn. 2: Terminologiia. Analiticheskie portrety. Ivanovo: PresSto, 2020. 256 s.