Your shopping cart is empty.
Log in

“Miriskusniki” and the genesis of acmeistic searches (about the review of one exhibition)

R. R. Kozhukharov
$2.50

UDC 82.02+7.01

DOI  https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2.2-24.094

 

Kozhukharov Roman R.,

Candidate of Philology,

Associate Professor of the Modern Russian Literature Department

A.M. Gorky Literary Institute

e-mail: r_k_md@mail.ru

 

The article presents the experience of comprehension V. Narbut’s publication “Mir Iskusstva” (“The World of Art”) in the St. Petersburg newspaper “Theater and Sport”. The article, dedicated to the exhibition of the same name, is written in the genre of art criticism, unique for the poet’s creative biography, and is perceived as a capacious manifestation of the author’s artistic preferences. The significance of comprehension this publication is due to its chronological correlation not only with the beginning of the poet’s creative path, but also with key events in the history of Russian literature at the beginning of the 20th century.

Keywords: V. Narbut, “Mir Iskusstva” (“The World of Art”), Z. Serebryakova, M. Churlenis, “Tsekh Poetov” (“The Workshop of Poets”), acmeism, M. Larionov, N. Goncharova, cubofuturists.

 

References

1. Kozhukharov R.R. Vladimir Narbut (i “Khokhol”) na stranitsakh peterburgskoi gazety “Teatr i sport” // Zvezda. 2022. No. 11. S. 251–265.

2. Narbut V. “Mir iskusstva” // Teatr i sport. 1912. No. 465 (24 ianvaria). S. 7–8.

3. Narbut V. “Mir iskusstva” // Teatr i sport. St. Petersburg, 1912. No. 466 (25 ianvaria). S. 10–11.

4. Gumilev N. Pis’ma o russkoi poezii // Apollon. 1911. No. 6. S. 74–75.

5. Timenchik R.D. Russkie pisateli. 1800–1917: biograficheskii slovar’. Moscow, 1989–2007. T. 4. S. 227–230.

6. Shruba M. Literaturnye ob”edineniia Moskvy i Peterburga 1890–1917 godov: slovar’. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004. 448 s.

7. Galakhov Vas. [Gippius Vas.]. Tsekh poetov // Zhizn’. 1918. No. 5 (Iiun’). S. 18.

8. Mayakovsky V. Ia sam // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 13 t. T. 1: 1912–1917. Moscow: GIKhL, 1955. 464 s.

9. Krusanov A.V. Russkii avangard: 1907–1932: (istoricheskii obzor): v 3 t. T. 1: Boevoe desiatiletie. Kn. 1. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010. 784 s.

10. Livshits B. Polutoraglazyi strelets: stikhotvoreniia, perevody, vospominaniia. Leningrad, 1989. 718 s.

11. Narbut V. Stikhotvoreniia // Novyi zhurnal dlia vsekh. 1913. No. 5. Stb. 147–150.

12. Lekmanov O. O knige Vladimira Narbuta “Alliluiia” // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2003. No. 63. S. 105–122.

13. Narbut V. “Tsekh poetov”: (literaturnye zametki) // Teatr i sport. 1912. No. 473–474 (4–5 fevralia). S. 7–8.

14. Narbut V., Zenkevich M. Stat’i. Retsenzii. Pis’ma. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2008. 332 s.

15. Shklovsky V. Iugo-Zapad // Literaturnaia gazeta. 1933. 5 ianvaria. S. 3.

16. Ronen O. Poedinki // Zvezda. 2008. № 9.

17. Panova L.G. Razgovor o vetre: Khlebnikov v mandel’shtamovskom vos’mistishii “Skazhi mne, chertezhnik pustyni…” // Voprosy literatury. 2014. No. 1.

18. Gumilev N. Akhmatovoi A. <1917, Parizh> // Stikhi i pis’ma / A. Akhmatova, N. Gumilev; publ., sost., primech. i vstup. slovo E. Gershtein // Novyi mir. 1986. No. 9. S. 196–227.

19. Pomada: [soch. Kruchenykh; ris. Larionova]. Moscow: Izd. G.L. Kuz’mina i S.D. Dolinskogo, 1913.

20. Bogomolov N. “Dyr bul shchyl” v kontekste epokhi // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2005. No. 72. S. 172–192.

21. Narbut V. Nezhit’ // Sobranie sochinenii: stikhi, perevody, proza / sost., podgot. teksta, vstup. st. i primech. R.R. Kozhukharova. Moscow: OGI, 2018. 832 s.

22. Dobuzhinsky M.V. Pis’ma. St. Petersburg, 2001. 444 s.

23. Dobuzhinsky M.V. — Notgafu F.F., 10 avgusta 1929, Parizh // Pis’ma / M.V. Dobuzhinsky. St. Petersburg, 2001. S. 227–229.