.png)
UDC 821.161.1-3
Prodanik Nadezhda V.,
Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Literature and Cultural Studies Department
Omsk State Pedagogical University
e-mail: omsk.nadezhda@mail.ru
The article deals with the images of explicit and implicit readers in the early and late works of I.A. Goncharov: the stories “Dashing Sick” and “Happy Mistake”, the novels “Ordinary History” and “Oblomov”, literary and critical articles of the writer are also researched. The literary genesis of the reader’s image in the works of I.A. Goncharov is determined by the dialogue with N.M. Karamzin and A.S. Pushkin. It is studied how the image of the addressee changed in the creative heritage of I.A. Goncharov. It is concluded that in the early stories the reader’s appearance was gender specific, more often endowed with positive features; the relationship of the narrator with the male or female reader was built in accordance with the sentimental, romantic model of narration as emotionally close — the narrator anticipated the reader’s reactions, carefully and caringly treated his reader. In the novels “Ordinary History” and “Oblomov” the author refused to concretize the image of the addressee, reduced the number of references to him in the text, created a realistically generalized image of the reader and practically equalized him in rights with the narrator. In the course of the study, it was found that changes in the images of explicit readers were due to a change in the author’s ideas about the implicit reader: if at the beginning of I.A. Goncharov saw the reader as a demanding and strict judge who was a contemporary, then at the time of maturity the author insisted on the freedom of the reader’s reaction, believed that reading and understanding the text should become an independent work for each person.
Keywords: creative works of I.A. Goncharov, explicit reader, implicit reader, novel by N.M. Karamzin “A Knight of Our Time”, novel by A.S. Pushkin “Eugene Onegin”.
References
1. Rubakin N.A. Etiudy o russkoi chitaiushchei publike. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo O. Popovoi, 1895. 246 s.
2. Beletsky A.I. Ob odnoi iz ocherednykh zadach istoriko-literaturnoi nauki (izuchenie istorii chitatelia) // Izbrannye trudy po teorii literatury / A.I. Beletsky. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 1989. S. 112–126.
3. Belinsky V.G. Sochineniia Aleksandra Pushkina. Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1985. 560 s.
4. Feduta A.I. “Kto b ni byl ty, o moi chitatel’…”: problema chitatelia v literature pushkinskoi epokhi. Minsk: Limarius, 2015. 400 s.
5. Lotman Yu.M. Ob odnom chitatel’skom vospriiatii “Bednoi Lizy” N.M. Karamzina // Rol’ i znachenie literatury XVIII v. v istorii russkoi kul’tury. Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka, 1966. S. 280–285.
6. Prozorov V.V. Chitatel’ i literaturnyi protsess. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 1975. 211 s.
7. Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i poniatii. Moscow: Intrada, 2008. 358 s.
8. Kafidova N.A. Chitatel’ kak problema poetiki // Vestnik RGGU. 2010. No. 11 (54). S. 97–110.
9. Tamarchenko N.D. Vvedenie. Chitatel’, tekst i “vnutrennii mir” literaturnogo proizvedeniia // Teoriia literatury: v 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Akademiia, 2004. S. 172–175.
10. Iz vospominanii I.A. Goncharova o Belinskom // Literaturnoe nasledstvo. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1950. T. 56. Kn. 2. S. 257–269.
11. Lebedeva O.B. Istoriia russkoi literatury XVIII veka. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 2003. 415 s.
12. Karamzin N.M. Sochinenia: v 2 t. T. 1. Leningrad: Khudozh. lit., 1984. 671 s.
13. Pushkin A.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. T. 4. Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1975. 520 s.
14. Bocharov S. Forma plana // Voprosy literatury. 1967. No. 12. S. 115–136.
15. Goncharov I.A. Likhaia bolest’. Schastlivaia oshibka // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 20 t. T. 1. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1997. S. 26–102.
16. Shumkova T.L. Povest’ I.A. Goncharova “Likhaia bolest’”: ironicheskaia interpretatsiia romanticheskogo stranstviia // Vestnik TGPU. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2007. Vyp. 8 (71). S. 28–33.
17. Grodetskaya A.G. Primechaniia [k povesti “Likhaia bolest’”] // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 20 t. / I.A. Goncharov. T. 1. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1997. S. 631–645.
18. Beisov P. Goncharov i rodnoi krai. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovskaya pravda, 1970. 133 s.
19. Grodetskaya A.G., Tunimanov V.A. Vstupitel’naia stat’ia k “Primechaniiam” // Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 20 t. / I.A. Goncharov. T. 1. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1997. S. 609–626.
20. Goncharov I.A. Neobyknovennaia istoriia // I.A. Goncharov: novye materialy i issledovaniia. Moscow: IMLI RAN: Nasledie, 2000. S. 184–304.
21. Goncharov I.A. Oblomov. Leningrad: Nauka, 1987. 696 s.
22. Goncharov I.A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t. Moscow: Gos. izd-vo khudozh. lit., 1952–1955.
23. Grodetskaya A.G. Chuvstvitel’nye i kholodnyi (V.A. Solonitsyn i sem’ia Maikovykh) // Litsa: biograficheskii al’manakh. Vyp. 8. St. Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin, 2001. S. 33