.png)
UDC 811.161.1`42
Shatskaya Marina F.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Russian Language and
Methods of its Teaching Department
Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University
e-mail: marina.schatzckaya@yandex.ru
The article is devoted to the study of “illocutionary suicide” in comic speech genres, the basis for the analysis of which was the model of the speech genre developed by T.V. Shmeleva. In linguopragmatics there is a narrow (Z. Wendler) and a broad understanding of the named pragmatic phenomenon. Given the specifics of Russian performatives, by “illocutionary suicide” we mean a speech act in which a verb (phrase, idiom) is used, forming the intention of “self-exposure”. During the analysis of the empirical material it was found that “illocutionary suicide” is stated only in jokes, jokes, comic dialogues and humorous “opinions about”. In addition to the obligatory intention to make the interlocutor laugh, intentional “self-exposure” also acts as a presenter. The axiological component of all the analyzed comic speech genres is multifaceted: from the point of view of real communicants, actions called “provocative” verbs are condemned by society; from the point of view of the heroes of these works, assessments and values can vary, up to a positive attitude to autonomous actions and deeds. The leading type of presumption is counterethical, which includes additional semantic shades. It is revealed that the content of the proposition is based mainly on ontological anomalies, sometimes synthesized with logical or lingual ones. The linguistic embodiment is presented in the traditional form for a performative speech act, or is mitigated by negation and constructions with the semantics of the condition.
Keywords: anomaly, illocutionary suicide, paradox, pragmatics, comic speech genres.
References
1. Wendler Z. Illokutivnoe samoubiistvo // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. 16: Lingvisticheskaia pragmatika. Moscow: Progress, 1985. S. 238–250.
2. Paducheva E.V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deistvitel’nost’iu: (referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenii). Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004. 288 s.
3. Pugacheva O.V. Problema otsutstviia standartnoi formuly dlia eksplikatsii kommunikativnykh intentsii govoriashchego // Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki. 2013. No. 1 (51). S. 290–294.
4. Bogdanova L.I. Kul’turnye parametry v grammatike dlia rechevykh deistvii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 19: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia. 2019. No. 4. S. 9–18.
5. Bogdanova L.I. Otsenochnye smysly v russkoi grammatike (na materiale glagolov emotsional’nogo otnosheniia) // Vestnik RUDN. Seriia: Lingvistika. 2018. T. 22. No. 4. S. 844–873.
6. Krysin L.P. Sotsial’nye komponenty v semantike leksicheskikh edinits i ego leksikograficheskaia interpretatsiia // Slovarnye kategorii: sb. st. / otv. red. Yu.N. Karaulov. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. S. 150–155.
7. Mishlanov V.A. Iazykovye i rechevye priznaki manipuliativnykh tekstov // Yurislingvistika. 2007. No. 8. S. 203–216.
8. Men’kova N.V. Diminutivy kak sredstvo iazykovoi igry // Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. 2014. T. 1. No. 3. S. 152–157.
9. Timofeeva S.V. Paradoksy nominalizatsii i anomalii obshcheniia // Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniia. 2016. No. 1. URL: https://human.snauka.ru/2016/01/13961 (02.06.2022).
10. Krylova O.V. Sposoby ukhoda ot illokutivnogo samoubiistva v mediatekste // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriia i filologiia. 2005. No. 1. S. 104–107.
11. Tripol’skaya T.A., Belyaeva S.M. Ekspressivnye glagoly govoreniia (opyt semantiko-pragmaticheskogo analiza) // Funktsional’nyi analiz edinits russkogo iazyka. Novokuznetsk, 1992. S. 101–107.
12. Repnina T.V. Sluchai upotrebleniia glagolov illokutivnogo samoubiistva v performativnoi ramke (na materiale frantsuzskogo iazyka) // Fundamental’nye i prikladnye issledovaniia: problemy i rezul’taty. 2014. No. 16. S. 174–180.
13. Kozhina M.N. Rechevoi zhanr i rechevoi akt (nekotorye aspekty problemy) // Zhanry rechi. 1999. No. 2. S. 52–61.
14. Dement’ev V.V. Kommunikativnaia genristika: rechevye zhanry kak sredstvo formalizatsii sotsial’nogo vzaimodeistviia // Zhanry rechi. 2002. No. 3. S. 18–40.
15. Sedov K.F. O zhanrovoi prirode diskursivnogo myshleniia iazykovoi lichnosti // Zhanry rechi. 1999. No. 3. S. 13–26.
16. Shmeleva T.V. Model’ rechevogo zhanra // Zhanry rechi. 1997. No. 1. S. 88–98.
17. Shmeleva T.V. Rechevoi zhanr: opyt obshchefilologicheskogo osmysleniia // Collegium.1995. No. 1–2. S. 57–65.
18. Shchurina Yu.V. Rechevye zhanry komicheskogo // Zhanry rechi. 1999. No. 2. S. 146–157.
19. Karasik V.I. Komicheskie attraktivy v setevom diskurse // Zhanry rechi. 2019. No. 3 (23). S. 227–233.
20. Karasik V.I. Algoritmy postroeniia komicheskikh tekstov // Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Lingvistika. 2018. T. 22. No. 4. S. 895–918.
21. Apresian Yu.D. Izbrannye raboty: v 2 t. Moscow: Shkola “Iazyki russkoi kul’tury”, 1995. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01006734665 (02.06.2022).
22. Karasik V.I. Anekdot kak predmet lingvisticheskogo izucheniia // Zhanry rechi. 1997. No. 1. S. 144–153.
23. Morozova A.M. Zhanrovaia spetsifika iumoristicheskogo diskursa // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. 2013. T. 1. No. 1. S. 216–222.
24. Shmelev A.D. Paradoks samofal’sifikatsii // Logicheskii analiz iazyka: protivorechivost’ i anomal’nost’ teksta / otv. red. N.D. Arutiunova. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. S. 83–93.