UDC 81`37(038)=161.1=512.122
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-20.218
Suleimenova Eleonora D.,
Doctor of Philology, Рrofessor
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
e-mail: esuleim@gmail.com
Shaimerdenova Nursulu Zh.,
Doctor of Philology, Рrofessor
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
e-mail: shaimerdenova.altair@gmail.com
Akanova Dana Kh.,
Doctor of Philology
University of Chicago (USA)
e-mail: dakanova@gmail.com
The whole-formed somatic verbs (verba anatomica) of the Kazakh and Russian languages and the motivation for their formation are compared. It is found that the verba anatomica of the Kazakh language are more detailed, differentiated and specialized, on the contrary, the units of the Russian language have a generalized character. The motivational ranks of verba anatomica have largely retained their symbolic and cultural significance. They still carry information about the mental and real world of Kazakhs and Russians.
Keywords: verba anatomica, somatic verb, national-cultural meaning, contrastive analysis.
References
1. Abibullina N. Erzhan Maksim ozinin sattilik sanyn ajtty. URL: https://baq.kz/news/othernews/erzhan-maksim-zini-s-ttilik-sanyn-aytty/ (in Kazakh).
2. Arutiunova N.D. Vvedenie // Logicheskii analiz iazyka. Obraz cheloveka v kul’ture i iazyke. Moscow, 1999.
3. Vezhbitskaia A. Semanticheskie universalii i “primitivnoe myshlenie” // Iazyk. Kul’tura. Poznanie. Moscow, 1997.
4. Vereshchagin E.M., Kostomarov V.G. Lingvostranovedcheskaia teo-riia slova. Moscow, 1980.
5. Zhagan G. Taқym қysatyn sәt keldі. URL: https://qamshy.kz/article/21412-taqym-qysatyn-sat-keldi-dimash-qudayberg...
6. Karmenov N. Tipy leksiko-semanticheskikh sviazei (na materiale nazvanii chastei tela v kazakhskom i arabskom iazykakh): аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Almaty, 2003 (in Kazakh.).
7. Kajdar A. Tysiacha metkikh i obraznykh vyrazhenii. Kazakhsko-russkii frazeologicheskii slovar’ s etnolingvisticheskimi poiasneniiami. Astana, 2003.
8. Kopylenko M.M. Osnovy etnolingvistiki // Izbrannye trudy po iazykoznaniiu. Almaty, 2010.
9. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow, 2004.
10. Murav’ev V.L. Leksicheskie lakuny (na materiale leksiki frantsuzskogo i russkogo iazykov). Vladimir, 1975.
11. Pak N.S. Kontrastivnyi analiz somaticheskikh glagolov (verba anatomica) v russkom i angliiskom iazykakh: аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Almaty, 2000.
12. Sabitova Z.K. Lingvokul’turologiia. Moscow, 2015.
13. Stepanov Iu.S. Vstupitel’naia stat'ia i kommentarii // Benvenist E. Obshchaia lingvistika. Moscow, 2002
14. Suleimenova E. D. Verba anatomica russkogo i kazakhskogo iazykov // Russko-ispanskie sopostavitel’nye issledovaniia: teoreticheskie i metodicheskie aspekty. Granada, 2011.
15. Sul’karnaeva A.R. Otsomaticheskaia vtorichnaia nominatsiia v tekhnicheskoi terminologii (na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo iazykov): аvtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Almaty, 2004.
16. Shmelev A.D. Russkaia iazykovaia model’ mira. Moscow, 2002.