https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-20.110
Thagazitov Yuriy M.,
Doctor of Philology, Leading Researcher of the
Institute for Humanitarian Studies
Kabardian-Balkarian Scientific Center
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Kazieva Almira М.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Literature and
Pedagogical Technologies Department
Pyatigorsk State University
e-mail: kazieva@pgu.ru
Uzdenova Fatima T.,
Candidate of Philology, Senior Scientific Researcher
|
of the Institute for Humanitarian Studies
|
Kabardian-Balkarian Scientific Center
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
e-mail: uzdenova_kbigi@mail.ru
The practice of national literature development exposed various aspects of the problems associated with the specifics of artistic thinking. Along with questions concerning the nature and direction of development of genres, form and subject-forming formants, poetic and stylistic peculiarities, the problem of creative individuality, which is able to reflect the world in the dialectical trinity, is particularly acute, (the subjective factor due to which perhaps aesthetic development of reality). Such a decision is directly related with the definition of the artist´s role in the evolutionary process. The processes in North Caucasian literature in the first half of the 20th century entailed the transformation of artistic and aesthetic consciousness. The creativity by Ali Shogentsukov, A. Budayev, A. Urtenov, A. Bashirov, T. Beybulatov and others largely outstripped the understanding of national history and culture development by contemporaries. At the turn of the XIX th and XX th centuries the form and content of the majority of North Caucasian literatures are developed, which rely mainly on the folklore and religious consciousness of the people, the traditions of the East and Russian Soviet classics, which determined the line of creative individuality evolution.
Keywords: creative individuality, North Caucasian literature, genre, literary process, poetry.
References
1. Arutiunov L.N. Natsional‘nyi khudozhestvennyi opyt i mirovoi literaturnyi protsess. Moscow, 1972. 26 s.
2. Uzdenova F.T. Tvorcheskaia individual‘nost‘ i natsional‘no-khudozhestvennoe svoeobrazie sovremennoi balkarskoi literatury // Vestnik Piatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2008. No. 4. S. 208–211.
3. Bakov Kh.I. Natsional‘noe svoeobrazie i tvorcheskaia individual‘nost‘ v adygskoi poezii. Maikop: Meoty, 1994. 253 s.
4. Tkhagazitov Iu.M., Tsipinov I.A. K voprosu khudozhestvennogo kon-flikta v natsional‘noi literature // Izvestiia KBNTs RAN. 2015. No. 3 (65). S. 288–293.
5. Teunov X.I. Ali Shogentsukov. Put‘ poeta. Nalchik, 1950. 189 s.
6. Ortabaeva R.A.-K. Azret Urtenov. Zhizn‘ i tvorchestvo. Cherkessk: Stavropol ‘skoe knizh. izd-vo, 1971. 152 s.