UDC 811.351`37
DOI 10.20339/PhS.5-26.023
Ibragimova Mariza Oglanovna,
Doctor of Philology, Docent, Chief Researcher
G. Tsadasa Institute of Language, Literature and Art
of the Dagestan Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Makhachkala, Russia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-3923
e-mail: mariza71@mail.ru
Research in the field of the logical-semantic category of quantitativeness, which expresses ideas about a complex of concepts of quantitative content — number, quantity, multitude, etc., remains one of the promising areas of modern Dagestan philology. The most frequent means of expressing the universal category of quantitativeness in the languages of the world are numerals, adjectives, adverbs, and quantitative pronouns. In this article, based on the material of the Dagestan languages, we consider less frequent representatives — diminutives and augmentatives, which reflect the semantics of the category of quantity, being contrasted according to the ‘small’ — ‘large’ feature. The fact that diminutives and augmentatives are peripheral actualizers of quantity semantics partly explains the scarcity of research in this area. The lack of morphological diminutive and augmentative formations in Dagestan languages necessitates their supplementation at the lexical-semantic level and prevents the described categories from being fully formed. The prospects of research aimed at studying diminutives and augmentatives, and comparing the forms of their actualization in numerous Dagestan languages, lie in the possibility of identifying and unifying the criteria for using representatives of the category of quantitativeness, which are contrasted by the semantics of ‘small’ and ‘large’, in idioms of various levels — in written and unwritten languages, dialects, and subdialects. In addition, the experience of studying material that is heterogeneous in terms of its area and grammar can be applied to the study of similar categories in other language families.
Keywords: Dagestan languages, the category of diminutivity, the category of augmentativity, representatives of the quantitativeness category
References
1. Akhmanova O.S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov. Izd. 2-e, ster. Moscow: Lenand, 2021. 576 s.
2. Efremova T.F. Sovremennyi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo iazyka. V 3 t. Moscow: AST, 2006.
3. Crystal D. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Limited, 2011. 560 p.
4. Frankl P.J.L., Omar Y.A. Diminutives and Insignificance, Augmentatives and ‘Monstrosity’: Examples of Class Re-Assignment in Swahili // South African Journal of African Languages. Vol. 14, Issue 3. P. 113–116.
5. Rozental D.E., Telenkova M.A. Slovar’-spravochnik lingvisticheskikh terminov. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1976. 543 s.
6. Dressler W.U., Barbaresi L.M. Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1994. 227 p.
7. Strukturnye obshchnosti kavkazskikh iazykov / G.A. Klimov, S.M. Khaidakov, A.K. Shagirov i dr. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 132 s.
8. Chirikba V.A. Aspekty fonologicheskoi tipologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 143 s.
9. Chirikba V.A. Phonological Features of Specialized Baby Lexicon (Caucasian Data) = Fonologicheskie cherty spetsializirovannogo detskogo leksikona (kavkazskie dannye) // Caucasian Perspectives / George Hewitt (ed.). Unterschleissheim; München: Lincom Eurora, 1992. P. 172–183. URL: https://www.academia.edu/1451328/.
10. Alisultanov A.S. Reduplikatsiia v leksicheskoi sisteme lezginskikh iazykov. Makhachkala: IP «Shakhbanov E.Kh.», 2012. 144 s.
11. Makhmudova S.M., Gadzhiakhmedov N.E., Samedov D.S. K voprosu ob ideofonicheskoi leksike v dagestanskikh iazykakh: na materiale detskikh slov // Sravnitel’no-sopostavitel’nye issledovaniia leksiki: mezhvuz. nauch.-temat. sb. Makhachkala: DGU, 1992. S. 80–87.
12. “Nanny language”: a representative of the semantics of diminutiveness in Dagestan languages / B. Ataev, I. Dibirov, M. Ibragimova et al. // The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS): International Scientific Conference “Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism”. SCTMG, 2020. P. 1906–1912.
13. Ethymological Origins of Baby Vocabulary in Dagestan Languages / B. Ataev, M. Ibragimova, S. Mallaeva et al. // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS: International Scientific Congress “Knowledge, Man and Civilization”. ISCKMC, 2020. P. 638–643.
14. Otsomieva-Tagirova Z., Ibragimova M., Yusupov Kh. Primary children’s vocabulary In Dagestan Languages // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS: International Scientific Congress “Knowledge, Man and Civilization”. ISCKMC, 2020. P. 1231–1238.
15. Abdullaev I.Kh. Mimeo-izobrazitel’nye slova v lakskom iazyke // Ezhegodnik iberiisko-kavkazskogo iazykoznaniia. T. 6. Tbilisi: AN Gruzinskoi SSR, 1979. S. 168–174.
16. Ibragimov G.Kh. Tsakhurskii iazyk. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 237 s.
17. Chirikba V.A. Detskii leksikon («detskaia rech’») v bezhtinskom iazyke. // Vestnik Dagestanskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2019. No. 75. S. 54–64.
18. Ibragimova M.O. Osobennosti realizatsii semantiki diminutivnosti v rutul’skom iazyke // Iazyk i tekst. Moscow: MGPPU, 2019. T. 6, No. 2. S. 40–43.
19. Caporael L.R., Lukaszewski M.P., Culbertson G.H. Secondary baby talk: Judgments by institutionalized elderly and their caregivers // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983. No. 44 (4). P. 746–754.
20. Temaeva I.V. Gerontnoe obshchenie: sotsiolingvisticheskii vzgliad na problemu // Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. “Sotsiologiia. Politologiia”. 2020. T. 20, vyp. 4. S. 407–411.
21. Ramazanova A.Kh. Kategoriia derogativnosti v raznosistemnykh iazykakh: semantika i funktsionirovanie: na materiale darginskogo, angliiskogo, russkogo i turetskogo iazykov: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Makhachkala, 2011. 26 s.
22. Ososkova A.S. Diminutivnye i augmentativnye naimenovaniia litsa v angloiazychnoi kartine mira: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Donetsk, 2025. 22 s.
23. Schneider K.P. Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag Gmbh, 2003. 254 p.




.png)








