.png)
UDC 811.161.1`42
DOI 10.20339/PhS.6s-25.135
Ivanowa Swetlana S.,
Сandidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Russian Language Department No. 1
Institute of the Russian Language
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: svetlana-ivanowa@yandex.ru
AuthorID: 210807, https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7794-8270
Vologina Natalia V.,
Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor,
Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs
Belarusian-Russian University (Mogilev, Belarus)
e-mail: nvshel@mail.ru
AuthorID: 801416
Lontskaya Maria A.,
Senior Lecturer of the Russian Language Department No. 1
Institute of the Russian Language
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: lontskayamaria@gmail.com
AuthorID: 720575, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6348-096X
This article comprehends the linguosemiotic mechanism of representing the spatial image of the ‘road’. The material of the analysis was the text of the story of the Soviet and Belarusian prose writer of the twentieth century Vasil Bykov, who wrote in Belarusian and Russian, “Crane Cry”, created in 1959. The choice of this particular work is due, firstly, to the fact that it is the spatial image of the road that is largely plot-forming. Secondly, the work of V. Bykov traditionally attracts the attention of literary scholars, but the linguistic component of his works has not been sufficiently studied. In the basis of the algorithm describing the mechanism of representation of the spatial image, we put the concept of Yu.S. Stepanov about the language operations of nomination, predication and localization. The name of the spatial image ‘road’ in the texts is attributed to predicates that display color, light, audio and other characteristics of space in general and road in particular. During the analysis, it is established that the language sign “road” is indexical-symbolic in the text. The index component represents a particular spatial coordinate. The symbol as a sign has no close connection with its referent. And the symbolic component of the sign ‘road’ reflects the abstract concept of the life and military path of the heroes of the stories.
Keywords: semiotopology, representation, epiphania, spatial image, nomination, predication, localization, Wasil Bykow
References
1. Arutiunova N.D. Predlozhenie i ego smysl: logiko-semanticheskie problemy. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2009. 384 s.
2. Benvenist E. Obshchaia lingvistika. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2002. 448 s.
3. Brazgovskaia E.E. Referentsiia i otobrazhenie: (ot filosofii iazyka k filosofii teksta). Perm’: PGPU, 2006. 191 s.
4. Brazgovskaia E.E. Tekst kul’tury: ot sobytiia — k sobytiiu: (logiko-semioticheskii analiz mezhtekstovykh vzaimodeistvii). Perm’: Permskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii un-t, 2004. 284 s.
5. Brazgovskaia E.E. Semiotika. Iazyki i kody kul’tury: uchebnik i praktikum dlia akademicheskogo bakalavriata. Moscow: Iurait, 2019. 187 s.
6. Bykov V. Zhuravlinyi krik. URL: https://militera.lib.ru/prose/russian/bykov7/01.html?ysclid=mdoi8eoeh545... (18.07.2025).
7. Biuler K. Teoriia iazyka. Reprezentativnaia funktsiia iazyka. Moscow: Progress, 2000. 502 s.
8. Vartovskii M. Modeli. Reprezentatsiia i nauchnoe ponimanie / per. s angl. Moscow: Progress, 1988. 506 s.
9. Gumbrekht Kh.U. Proizvodstvo prisutstviia: chego ne mozhet peredat’ znachenie. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006. 184 s.
10. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiia. St. Petrsburg: Akademicheskii proekt, 1998. 261 s.
11. Egorova M.A. «Kognitivnoe prostranstvo» i ego sootnoshenie s poniatiiami «mental’noe prostranstvo», «kognitivnaia baza», «kontseptosfera», «kartina mira» // Vestnik IGLU. Seriia: Filologiia. Irkutsk, 2012. No. 3. S. 61–68.
12. El’mslev L. Prolegomeny k teorii iazyka // Novoe v lingvistike. 1960. Vyp. 1. S. 264–390.
13. Lebedev M.V. Ontologicheskie problemy referentsii. Moscow: Praksis, 2001. 344 s.
14. Lotman Iu.M. Semiotika prostranstva // Izbrannye stat’i: v 3 t. T. 1. Tallinn: Aleksandra, 1992. S. 414.
15. Mechkovskaia N.B. Iazyk. Priroda. Kul’tura. Moscow: Izd. tsentr “Akademiia”, 2007. 432 s.
16. Nikulin D.V. Prostranstvo // Novaia filosofskaia entsiklopediia: v 4 t. T. 3. Moscow: Mysl’, 2010. S. 370.
17. Paducheva E.N. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deistvitel’nost’iu: referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenii. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2010. 296 s.
18. Solomonik A. Paradigma semiotiki: ocherki po obshchei semiotike: s prilozheniem slovaria semioticheskikh terminov. Moscow: LKI, 2011. 336 s.
19. Stepanov Iu.S. Imena, predikaty, predlozheniia: semiologicheskaia grammatika. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI, 2007. 360 s.
20. Tressinder Dzh. Slovar’ simvolov. URL: https://www.lesjeunesrussisants.fr/dictionnaires/documents/DICTIONNAIRE_... (18.07.2025).
21. Fizicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ / gl. red. B.A. Vvedenskii, B.M. Vul. Moscow: Sov. entsiklopediia, 1965. 594 s.
22. Cherneiko L.O. Lingvofilosofskii analiz abstraktnogo imeni. Moscow: Librokom, 2010. 272 s.
23. Chernukhina M.A. Kategorii prostranstva i vremeni v istorii i filosofii kul’tury // Vestnik Tiumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. No. 10. S. 29–36.
24. Chertov L.F. Znakovaia prizma: stat’i po obshchei i prostranstvennoi semiotike. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur, 2014. 414 s.
25. Chertov L.F. Prostranstvo i smysl v filosofii E. Kassirera // Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. 2011. T. 12. Vyp. 4. S. 234–248.
26. Shagalov A. Vasil’ Bykov. Povesti o voine. Moscow: Khudozh. lit., 1989. 302 s.