.png)
Kunovski Marina N.,
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor,
Head of the Russian Language Department No. 2
Institute of the Russian Language
Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: kunovski-mn@rudn.ru
Dinevich Irina A.,
Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Russian Language Department No. 2
Institute of the Russian Language
Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: dinevich-ia@rudn.ru
Kobylko Yaroslav,
Candidate of Philology,
Associate Professor of the Russian Language Department No. 2
Institute of the Russian Language
Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
e-mail: kobylko_ya@pfur.ru
The paper is devoted to the consideration of the features of the grammatical representation of words of the state category in the Russian, English and German languages. This issue is relevant because currently the research does not show terminological uniformity and consistency regarding the qualification of the semantic-grammatical nature of words of the state category in different languages and their status among other parts of speech. A unified scientific approach is observed only on the issue of the ability of these lexemes to denote various emotional-expressive states and implement the function of the main member of a one-part impersonal sentence. The following methods are used in the research: the method of comprehensive theoretical analysis of classical and modern scientific literature on this issue, the descriptive method, the method of analysis and generalization. The authors touch upon the problem of determining the status and nomination of words of the state category in the languages being compared, indicate the historical aspect of considering words of the state category in the scientific literature, and consider the plan for expressing morphological and syntactic representation in Russian, English and German. It is noted that in the Russian language, unlike the English and German languages, there are pronounced grammatical features of the state category: morphological invariability, the presence of a tense category, the ability to control the case forms of nouns and pronouns, the syntactic function of the main member of a one-part impersonal sentence. The conducted comparative analysis made it possible to prove that, regardless of the morphological conditionality and grammatical markers of words of the state category, represented in Russian, English and German, this part of speech is a grammatical universal, realized in different linguistic pictures of the world.
Keywords: words of the category of state, grammatical representation, predicative, impersonal sentence, Russian, English, German
References
1. Mel’nik A.D. Problema slov kategorii sostoianiia v sovremennoi lingvisticheskoi literature // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia. 2015. No. 2, ch. 2. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23004 (14.06.2024).
2. Kategoriia sostoianiia v sisteme chastei rechi / Yu.V. Bul’ina, A.A. Mel’chukova, A.A. Tulupova, M.A. Tolmacheva // Universum: filologiia i iskusstvovedenie. 2024. No. 4 (118). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/17211 (14.06.2024).
3. Gladyshev A.G. Semantika statichnosti v predlozheniiakh s predikatom sostoianiia // Russkaia filologiia i natsional’naia kul’tura. 2022. No. 3 (4). S. 1–10.
4. Vinogradov V.V. Leksikologiia i leksikografiia: izbrannye trudy. Moscow, 1977. 312 s.
5. Pospelov N.S. V zashchitu kategorii sostoianiia // Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 1955. No. 2.
6. Tikhonov A.N. Kategoriia sostoianiia v sovremennom russkom iazyke. Samarkand: Izd-vo Samarkandskogo gos. un-ta, 1960. 43 s.
7. Dinevich I.A. Lingvokul’turologicheskoe issledovanie slov kategorii sostoianiia: monografiia. Kursk, 2008. 140 s.
8. Migirin V.N. Iazyk kak sistema otobrazheniia. Kishinev, 1973. 312 s.
9. Shapiro A.B. Est’ li v russkom iazyke kategoriia sostoianiia kak chast’ rechi // Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 1955. No. 2. S. 42–55.
10. Kazarina V.I., Neliubova I.V. K voprosu o leksiko-grammaticheskoi kategorii sostoianiia v otechestvennoi lingvistike // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. No. 3 (69), ch. 3. S. 113–116.
11. Glinkina L.A. O dinamike slov kategorii sostoianiia v istorii russkogo iazyka // Filologicheskii klass. 2016. No. 1 (43). S. 1–7.
12. Kolesnikova S.M. Vopros o slovakh kategorii sostoianiia // Russkii iazyk v shkole. 2017. No. 2. S. 16–19.
13. Espersen O. Filosofiia grammatiki. Moscow: Inostrannaia literatura, 1958. 329 s.
14. Zangieva L.E. Nekotorye problemy leksicheskikh sistem slov kategorii sostoianiia v angliiskom i drugikh iazykakh // Voprosy pedagogiki. 2021. No. 12, ch. 1. S. 142–149.
15. Tsimmerling A.V. Impersonal’nye konstruktsii i dativno-predikativnye struktury v russkom iazyke // Voprosy iazykoznaniia. 2018. No. 5. S. 7–33. DOI 10.31857/S0373658X0001394-2.
16. Volynets T.N. Poetika slov kategorii sostoianiia // Voprosy funk-tsional’noi grammatiki: sb. nauch. trudov. Vyp. 5. Grodno, 2005. S. 211–226.
17. Pan’kova N.V. Slova kategorii sostoianiia kak stilisticheskoe i izobrazitel’no-vyrazitel’noe sredstvo iazyka // Molodoi uchenyi. 2022. No. 34 (429). S. 154–156. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/429/94557/ (14.06.2024).
18. Bulakhovsky L.A. Aktsentologicheskaia problematika voprosa o slaviano-baltiiskom iazykovom edinstve. Moscow, 1959.
19. Shcherba L.V. O chastiakh rechi v russkom iazyke // Russkaia rech’. Vyp. 2. Leningrad, 1928.
20. Russkaia grammatika: v 2 t. / redkol.: N.Yu. Shvedova (gl. red.), E.A. Bryzgunova, K.V. Gabuchan, V.A. Tsikovich. T. 1: Fonetika. Fonologiia. Udarenie. Intonatsiia. Slovoobrazovanie. Morfologiia. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. 789 s.
21. Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ / gl. red. V.N. Yartseva. Moscow: Sovetskaia entsiklopediia, 1990. 683 s.
22. Mel’nikov G.P. Morfologicheskii stroi iazyka i sredstva slovorazgranicheniia // Issledovaniia po fonologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1966. S. 263–284.
23. Boduen de Kurtene I.A. Izbrannye trudy po obshchemu iazykoznaniiu. Moscow, 1963. T. 1.
24. Vinogradov V.V. Russkii iazyk: grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 1972. 613 s.
25. Demyankov V.Z. Freim // Kratkii slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov. Moscow, 1996. 380 s.
26. Teoriia funktsional’noi grammatiki: sub”ektnost’, ob”ektnost’, kommunikativnaia perspektiva vyskazyvaniia, opredelennost’/neopredelennost’ / otv. red. A.V. Bondarenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1992. 304 s.
27. Russkaia grammatika: v 2 t. / redkol.: N.Yu. Shvedova (gl. red.), E.A. Bryzgunova, K.V. Gabuchan, V.A. Tsikovich. T. 2: Sintaksis. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. 709 s.
28. Galkina-Fedoruk E.M. Bezlichnye predlozheniia v sovremennom russkom iazyke. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1958. 332 s.