.png)
UDC 811.351`2
DOI https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2.2-24.022
Otsomieva-Tagirova Zabihat M.,
Candidate of Philology, Leading Researcher
Tsadasa Institute of Language, Literature and Art
Dagestan Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Scienes, Makhachkala
e-mail: zabi011@yandex.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-8465
Temirbulatova Sapiyakhanum M.,
Doctor of Philology
Tsadasa Institute of Language, Literature and Art
Dagestan Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Scienes, Makhachkala
e-mail: sapiiakhanum@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-3831
The article attempts to present the possibilities of using the modeling method to study the toponymic space in Dagestan languages. A field model of the toponymic space of Avar, Dargin and Kaitag settlements is proposed, taking into account the methods of nomination and education considered through the prism of the case system of these languages. The reference to the category of space in our work is primarily due to the fact that Dagestan languages have a developed system of spatial cases, the forms of which are reflected in their rich toponymic nomenclature. The toponym, as you know, is the “name of the place”, the designation of a point on the surface of the earth. The article discusses approaches to the definition of space functions in the toponymic system of Dagestan languages. The purpose of the work is to identify and compare various functional explanations of the essence of space in the toponymic system of related languages. The article describes the toponymic systems of the Avar, Dargin languages and the Haidak dialect of the Dargin language as the most interesting linguistic units in terms of expressing locative meanings in Dagestan toponymy. The characteristics of toponyms considered from the standpoint of their cognitive and cultural understanding are shown. Dagestan toponymy is defined by names formed by means of spatial case formants, the model of which is the most characteristic, ancient and archaic.
Keywords: Dagestan languages, Avar language, Dargin language, Haidak dialect of Dargin language, toponymic system, spatial case system, modeling of toponyms in the languages studied, toponymic space, field approach, toponym.
References
1. Teoriia funktsional’noi grammatiki. Lokativnost’. Bytiinost’. Posessivnost’. Obuslovlennost’. St. Petersburg, 1996. 230 s.
2. Yakovleva E.S. Fragmenty russkoi iazykovoi kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vospriiatiia). Moscow: Gnozis, 1994. 344 s.
3. Comri B. Reference-tracking: description and explanation // Sprachtypol. Univ. Forsch. 1998. Vol. 5. P. 335–346. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/3903178.
4. Ibragimova M.O. Sposoby vyrazheniia prostranstvennykh otnoshenii v rutul’skom iazyke // Aktual’nye problemy iazyka i literatury. Makhachkala, 2000.
5. Otsomieva Z.M. Onomasticheskoe prostranstvo i mesto toponimov v leksicheskom sostave avarskogo iazyka // Kavkazskie iazyki: genetiko-tipologicheskie obshchnosti i areal’nye sviazi: tezisy dokladov V Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Makhachkala, 2016. S. 135–136.
6. Tagirova Z.M. K voprosu o strukturno-slovoobrazovatel’noi kharakteristike avarskikh agroonimov // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2016. No. 11 (65). S. 141–143.
7. Golomidova M.V. Iskusstvennaia nominatsiia v russkoi onomastike. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skii gos. ped. un-t, 1998. 232 s.
8. Tagirova Z.M. Leksiko-semanticheskaia verbalizatsiia vikonimicheskoi leksiki v avarskoi toponimii // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Filologiia. Zhurnalistika. 2022. No. 4. S. 40–44.
9. Kibrik A.E. Konstanty i peremennye v iazyke. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2003. 661 s.
10. Plungian V.A. Obshchaia morfologiia. Vvedenie v problematiku. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2003. 384 s.
11. Mallaeva Z.M. Sistema vremennykh i prostranstvennykh otnoshenii v avarskom iazyke: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tbilisi, 1989. 25 s.
12. Magomedov M.A. Nekotorye voprosy peredachi prostranstvennykh otnoshenii lokativnymi padezhami v avarskom iazyke // Vyrazhenie prostranstvennykh otnoshenii v iazykakh Dagestana. Makhachkala, 1990. S. 133–139.
13. Mallaeva Z.M., Medzhidova M.K. Grammatikalizatsiia prostranstvennoi semantiki v sisteme imeni dagestanskikh iazykov. Makhachkala, 2008. 164 s.
14. Abdullaev S.N. Grammatika darginskogo iazyka (fonetika i morfologiia). Makhachkala, 1954. 216 s.
15. Abdullaev Z.G. Kategoriia padezha v darginskom iazyke. Makhachkala, 1961. 201 s.
16. Musaev M.-S.M. Padezhnyi sostav darginskogo iazyka. Makhachkala, 1984. 116 s.
17. Temirbulatova S.M. Khaidakskii dialekt darginskogo iazyka. Makhachkala, 2004. 301 s.
18. Temirbulatova S.M. Iz khaidakskoi mikrotoponimii // Dagestanskaia onomastika. Makhachkala, 1991. S. 57–65.
19. Saidova P.A. Dialektologicheskii slovar’ avarskogo iazyka. Moscow: Nauka, 2008. 484 s.
20. Mel’chuk I.A. Kurs obshchei morfologii: v 2 t. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury; Vena: WSA, 1997–1998.
21. Bagomedov M.R. Toponimiia Darga: strukturno-semanticheskii aspekt. Makhachkala, 2013. 347 s.
22. Komri B., Polinskaia M. K voprosu ob analize padezhnykh form i padezhnykh kategorii v nekotorykh dagestanskikh iazykakh // Deviatyi mezhdunarodnyi kollokvium Evropeiskogo obshchestva kavkazovedov: tezisy dokladov. Makhachkala, 1998. S. 71–72.