The statality and passivity of participles in -n/-t in Russian

UDC 811.161.1`36

DOI 10.20339/PhS.4-23.016   

Zhang Bono,

Candidate of Philology, Senior Lecturer

Beijing Normal University (China)

e-mail: zbn822@163.com

The question of participles on -n/-t, which in terms of the pledge category turn out to be marked members and in their morphological form constantly express a passive meaning, is considered. But the pledge in the Russian language is a morphological and syntactic category. It reflects the opposite both at the level of morphological forms and at the level of syntactic structures. From this position, the definition of collateral values is not scientifically justified only from the point of view of morphological features. The purpose of this article is to establish the differences between short forms of participles on -n/-t, which have a passive meaning, and short forms of participles on -n/-t, which have a static meaning. The materials of this article bring a certain theoretical significance to the category of the pledge of the Russian language.

Keywords: pledge, perfect form, static participles on -n/-t, passive participles on -n/-t.

References

Bulanin L.L. Trudnye voprosy morfologii. Moscow, 1976.

Isachenko A.V. Grammaticheskii stroi russkogo iazyka v sopostavlenii so slovatskim: morfologiia. Moscow, 2003.

Knyazev Yu.P. Grammaticheskaia semantika: russkii iazyk v tipologicheskoi perspektive. Moscow, 2007.

Pertsov N.V. Invarianty v russkom slovoizmenenii. Moscow, 2001.

Russkaia grammatika: v 2 t. T. 1. Moscow: Nauka, 1980.

Tipologiia vida: problemy, poiski, resheniia: sb. st. Moscow, 1998.

Khrapovsky V.S. Problemy teorii grammaticheskogo zaloga. Leningrad, 1978.

Shelyakin M.A. Funktsional’naia grammatika russkogo iazyka. Moscow, 2001