.png)
UDC 81`42
https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-20.030
Temirgazina Zifa K.,
Doctor of Philology, Professor
Pavlodar State Pedagogical University (Kazakhstan)
ORCID: 0000-0003-3399-7364
e-mail: zifakakbaevna@mail.ru
e-mail: malgorzata@luczyk.pl
Luczyk Malgorzata,
Doctor of Philology, Professor,
Director of the Institute of Neophilology
Zelenogursk University (Zielona Gora, Poland)
ORCID: 0000 0002 6887 0163
e-mail: malgorzata@luczyk.pl
The article examines the specifics of semiosis, which results in signs for the nomination of new realities in the context of a coronavirus pandemic. The study shows that “Newspeak” of the quarantine era is formed during the work process of two main mechanisms: the extension of the already existing meanings of word signs in the language (war, front line, enemy, embrasure, paranoia, bacchanalia) and production of words according to standard derivational models, activating in the minds of native speakers in case of need (covidnyi, covidarii, dokarantinnyi, poslekarantinnyi, karantinit’). Using these mechanisms, native speakers act in accordance with the principle of language economy, relying on their existing knowledge and stereotypes of language production to learn new experiences. The third way for new words to appear is through borrowing, which takes a less significant place in creating “Newspeak” of the pandemic era (lockdown, sanitizer). The “pandemic” discourse is characterized by such connotative signifiers as negative evaluation and emotionality, globalization of perception, uncontrollability, and unpredictability. They determine a person's choice to connect language signs and new objects during semiosis.
Keywords: semiosis, “pandemic discourse”, “newspeak”, quarantine, metaphorical model, word-formation model, neologism.
References
1. Bartov, A.A. “Novoiaz” v literature i v zhizni // Neva. 2009. No. 3. S. 11–17.
2. Gareeva L.M. Sovremennyi russkii novoiaz: raznovidnosti i tendentsii razvitiia // Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-issledovatel’skii zhurnal. 2020. No. 6 (96). Ch. 3. S. 119–121. URL: https://research-journal.org/languages/sovremennyj-russkij-novoyaz-razno... (15.07.2020). DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2020.96.6.101
3. Komarova Z.I. Metodologiia, metod, metodika i tekhnologiia nauchnykh issledovanii v lingvistike. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2013. 818 s.
4. Eco U. Trattato di semiotica generale. Milano: Bompiani, 1975. 250 p.
5. Alefirenko N.F. “Zhivoe” slovo: Problemy funktsional’noi leksikologii. Moscow: Flinta:Nauka, 2009. 344 s.
6. Zubkova O.S. Metafora kak chast’ estestvennogo semiozisa // Filologiia. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2010. No. 4(1). S. 326–331.
7. Temirgazina Z.K. Namerennye nedomolvki v ustnoi rechi: pragma-ticheskii aspect // Filologicheskie nauki. NDVSh. 2013. No. 1. S. 33–40.
8. Temirgazina Z., Khamitova G., Orazalinova K. Didactic features of a learner’s english-russian dictionary of biology development // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2016. 7(2). P. 317–326.
9. Kiseleva L.A. Sovremennaia lingvistika emotsii: postklassicheskii etap // Filologicheskie nauki. NDVSh. 2020. No. 2. S. 11–18. DOI: 10.20339/PhS.2-20.011
10. URL: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news (15.06.2020).
11. Barthes R. Oeuvres complètes. 1968–1971 / nouvelle édition revue, corrigée et présentée par Eric Marty. Paris: Seuil, 2002. V. 3. 1074 p.
12. URL: https://kapital.kz (05.07.2020).
13. URL: https://365info.kz (03.07.2020).
14. URL: https://inbusiness.kz/ru (09.07.2020).
15. URL: https://news.mail.ru (12.07.2020).
16. Buinova O.Iu. Universal’nye i spetsificheskie cherty protsessa metaforizatsii // Lingvisticheskie issledovaniia. Dubna: Feniks+, 2001. S. 49–65.
17. Efremova T.F. Novyi slovar’ russkogo iazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatel’nyi. Moscow: Russkii iazyk, 2000.
18. Kustova G.I. Tipy proizvodnykh znachenii i mekhanizmy iazykovogo rasshireniia. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2004. 472 s.
19. Alekseeva L.M., Mishlanova S.L. Meditsinskii diskurs: teoreticheskie osnovy i printsipy analiza. Perm’: Izd-vo Permskogo un-ta, 2002. 200 s.
20. Iunusova I.V. Semiotika sozvuchii v razvernutykh proizvedeniiakh nauchnoi rechi // Lingvisticheskie issledovaniia. Dubna: Feniks+, 2001. S. 156–174.