Your shopping cart is empty.
Log in

Let’s think, and all we four ...” (Reasoning as a linguo-pedagogical method and an element of poetics in the story of L.A. Yartsova “The Inexhaustible Purse”)

A.V. Zelenin, D.V. Rudnev
80,00 ₽

UDC 81`42

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.1-22.044 

 

Zelenin Alexandr V.,

Doctor of Philology, Lecturer of the Information Technology and

Communication Sciences Faculty

Tampere University (Finland)

e-mail: aleksandr.zelenin@tuni.fi

Rudnev Dmitry V.,

Doctor of Philology, Candidate of History, Associate Professor,

Professor of the Russian Language Department

Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

e-mail: rudnevd@mail.ru

 

Heated debates about the methods of teaching children their native language, about understanding the differences between the types of texts as a mechanism and a product of mental activity were inextricably linked with the deep transformation of Russian society in the second half of the 19th century. A significant strengthening of monetary and financial relations in a changing society, and, as a result, the penetration of money into family communication became an urgent educational issue for children’s literature. L.A. Yartsova in her story “The Inexhaustible Purse” (1861) innovatively revealed the theme of money in the life of a child, using the functional-semantic type of speech “reasoning”. Different types of reasoning (refutation, inference, confirmation, justification) are used in the story as a tool of poetics and didactics. The story is structured as a cycle of meaningfully unrelated stories-reasoning, in which a mother and her three children of different ages independently seek rational-logical and lexical-syntactic arguments to reveal the metaphor-task “inexhaustible purse”. The linguo-didactic aspect of Yartsova’s story lies in the fact that in the process of writing stories-reasoning (the function of writing in literature lessons), children master the method of constructing reasoning and linguistic forms for its implementation (educational-target function). The stories represent a gradational-hierarchical ascent to the concept of money: from the limited by age and personality (the reasoning of children) to the socially significant, synthesized in the reasoning of the mother. Yartsova’s use of reasoning as a way of constructing a children’s story testifies to the penetration in the 19th century of elements of scientific speech into other speech systems, including the language of children’s fiction.

Keywords: Russian children’s literature, the topic of money, scientific speech, functional and semantic types of speech, reasoning, metaphor, L.A. Yartsova.

 

Source

Yartsova L.A. Neistoshchimyi koshelek: rasskaz dlia detei. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo M.O. Volfa, 1861.

 

References

1. Reitblat A.I. Ot Bovy k Bal’montu: ocherki po istorii chteniia v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX veka. Moscow: Izd-vo MPI, 1991. 221 s.

2. Karaichentseva S.A. Russkaia detskaia kniga XVIII–XX vv.: ocherki evoliutsii repertuara, 1717–1990 gg. Moscow: Izd-vo MGUP, 2006. 290 s.

3. Khellman B. Skazka i byl’: istoriia russkoi detskoi literatury. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2006. 555 s.

4. Russian children’s literature and culture / ed. by M. Balina, L. Rudova. New York; London: Routledge, 2008. 390 p.

5. Gukovsky G.A. Realizm Gogolia. Moscow; Leningrad: Gos. izd-vo khudozh. lit., 1959. 531 s.

6. Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo iazyka V.I. Dhalia. T. 1–4. Moscow: Ob-vo liubitelei rossiiskoi slovesnosti, uchrezhdennoe pri Imperatorskom Moskovskom universitete, 1863–1865.

7. Mikhelson M.I. Russkaia mysl’ i rech’. Svoe i chuzhoe: opyt russkoi frazeologii: sb. obraznykh slov i inoskazanii.St. Petersburg: [tip. akts. obshch. “Brokgauz-Efron”], 1912. 1161 s.

8. Blamires D. Folktales and fairytales in the Middle ages // Bulletin of the John Rylands Library. 1992. No. 74 (1). P. 97–108.

9. Belova O. Nerazmennyi rubl’ v pover’iakh i magicheskikh praktikakh slavian // Antropologicheskii forum. St. Petersburg: Muzei antropologii i etno-grafii im. Petra Velikogo (Kunstkamera). 2013. No. 18. S. 230–242.

10. Klich Ed. Narzecze wsi Borki Nizińskie. Kraków: Drukarnia Uniwer-sytetu Jagiellonskiego pod zarzadem J. Filipowskiego, 1919. 107 s.

11. Uspensky B.A. Filologicheskie razyskaniia v oblasti slavianskikh drevnostei (relikty iazychestva v vostochnoslavianskom kul’te Nikolaia Mirlikiiskogo). Moscow: MGU, 1982. 245 s.

12. Afanasev A.N. Poeticheskie vozzreniia slavian na prirodu: opyt sravnitel’nogo izucheniia slavianskikh predanii i verovanii v sviazi s mificheskimi skazaniiami drugikh rodstvennykh narodov. T. 1–3. Moscow: Sovremennyi pisatel’, 1995.

13. Kopnina G.A. Oproverzhenie // Effektivnoe rechevoe obshchenie (bazovye kompetentsii): slovar’-spravochnik. Krasnoiarsk: SFU, 2012. S. 366–367.

14. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004. 256 s.

15. Arutyunova N.D. Iazyk i mir cheloveka. 2-e izd., ispr. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury, 1999. 896 s.

16. Trosheva T.B. Rassuzhdenie // Stilisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ russkogo iazyka / pod red. M.N. Kozhinoi. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 2003. S. 321–328.

17. Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo iazyka: v 17 t. Moscow; Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1964.

18. Krotkov E.A. O rassuzhdenii kak metode poznaniia // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. No. 6. S. 170–180.