Principles of a morphological homonymy in Indo-European languages (on a material Old-Armenian language)

https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.5-18.009

Khachatryan Lalik М.,

Doctor of Philological sciences, professor

Armenian State Pedagogical University n.a. Khachatur Abovyan, Erevan

e-mail lingualal51@mail.ru

The phenomena of morphological polysemy and homonymies have been considered by many scientists since antique times. Conditions of functioning of words of one part of speech in a role of words of other part of speech are defined, borders of such use are established, however till now there is no answer to a question, thanks to those reasons the word gets new morphological values and how morphological polysemy passes in a homonymy. The author considers a material of old-Аrmenian language (with use of examples from texts of V century) and the principles are described, which is a reason for the investigated historical experience, and it is possible to consider as one more step to definition of sources of a morphological homonymy in Indo-European languages.

Keywords: morphological, a polysemy, a homonymy, history, Old-Armenian language.

References

1.         Avetikian G. Grammatika armyanskaia. Venetsiya, 1815 (na arm. iaz.).

2.         Adonts N. Dionisii Frakijskii i armyanskie tolkovateli. Petrograd, 1915.

3.         Vinogradov V.V. Russkii iazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove. Moskva: MGU, 1972.

4.         Gvozdev A.N. Sovremennyi russkii literaturnyi iazyk. T. I. Moskva: Uchpedgiz, 1958.

5.         Dzhaukian G.B. Osnovy teorii sovremennogo armyanskogo iazyka. Erevan, AN Arm. SSR, 1974 (na arm. iaz.).

6.         Dzhaukian G.B. Istoriia armyanskogo iazyka: dopis‘mennyi period. Erevan, AN ArmSSR, 1987 (na arm. iaz.).

7.         Madoian V.V. Ocherki po istorii i teorii russkogo substantivnogo slovoizmeneniia. Moskva, RAN, 2000. S. 130.

8.         Sebastatsi Mkh. Grammatika drevnearmyanskogo iazyka Gaikanskogo roda. Venetsiia, 1730 (na arm. iaz.).

9.         Smirnitskii A.I. Leksikologiia angliiskogo iazyka. Moskva, 1956.

10.       Tumanian E. Drevnearmianskij iazyk. Moskva: Nauka, 1971.

11.       Khachatryan L.M. Sdvigi v morfologicheskom znachenii slov. Erevan, 1985 (na arm. iaz.).

12.       Khachatryan L.M. Morfologicheskaia polisemiia v ustoichivykh slovosochetaniiakh sovremennogo armianskogo iazyka. Erevan, 1996 (na arm. iaz.).

13.       Khachatryan L.M. Tolkovyi slovar‘ drevnearmianskogo iazyka. Morfologicheski polisemichnye slova. Erevan, 2003 (na arm. iaz.).

14. Bloch M.Yu. A Course in Theoretical English. Moscow, 1983.
15. Chafe W.L. Meaning and Structure of Language, the University of Chicago Press. Chicago & London, 1971.
16. Schmidt W. Deutsche Sprachkunde. Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag. Berlin, 1985.
17. Yung W. Grammatik der Deutschen Sprache. VEB Bibliographisches Institut. Leipzig, 1968.

Sources

Agat. — Agafangel. Istoriia Armenii. Tiflis, 1909.

Buz. — Pavstos Buzand. Istoriia Armenii. Tiflis, 1913.

Ezn. — Eznik. Oproverzhenie eresei. Venetsiia, 1826.

Eg. — Egishe. O Vartane i armianskoi voine. Erevan, 1957.

Khor. — Khorenatsi M. Istoriia Armenii. Tiflis, 1913.

NGS — Novyi Gaikanskii slovar’, tt. 1–2. Venetsiia, 1836–1837.

Parp. — Parpetsi L. Istoriia Armenii. Tiflis, 1904.